Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 3038–3043 | Cite as

Reduced-port surgery: preservation of the critical view in single-port-access cholecystectomy

  • Erica R. Podolsky
  • Paul G. CurcilloII



Over the past 3 years, minimal-access surgery has seen movement toward single-port-access (SPA) surgery. Since its inception in the spring of 2007, a number of differing approaches and technologies for reduced-port surgery have become available to move the field toward “scarless” surgery. As with any advance, a cautious eye needs to observe changes with respect to the risks and benefits of new procedures or devices. Although the adoption of reduced-port techniques in cholecystectomy may move the field of surgery forward, there is a need to ensure that basic tenets of safety are not left behind. In cholecystectomy, one of the gold standards for safety is preservation of the critical view of safety during cystic duct dissection and transection.


Early in the development of SPA surgery, a standardized procedure was sought that could be extended safely to laparoscopic surgeons. With this ideal in mind, the technique of SPA cholecystectomy was evaluated early. Deeming exposure to be critical, specifically the view of the cystic-to-common duct relationship beneath the liver, the authors aimed to evaluate whether this critical view of safety can be maintained during the procedure and before the cystic port is clipped and transected. To determine reproducibility, the authors did a simple comparison of their initial 10 two-instrument SPA cholecystectomies with their subsequent 10 three-instrument cholecystectomies by reviewing the videos of each case.


The authors’ review confirmed that the critical view of safety was obtained in all the three-instrument cases but was difficult to obtain in the two-instrument procedures. In addition, they were able to demonstrate the critical angle of clip placement in all three-instrument cases.


The authors present their initial results in an attempt to demonstrate that as new procedures develop, there is a need to ascertain their safety and adherence to underlying principles already established before advancing them further at the risk of compromise and complication.


Cholecystectomy Technical Single port access surgery Complications Single incision laparoscopic surgery Common bile duct 



Paul G. Curcillo has spoken about single-port-access surgery for Storz Endoscopy, Ethicon Inc., Olympus Inc., and Microline. Erica R Podolsky has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F (2000) History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med 42:87–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Litwin DE, Cahan MA (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 88(6):1295–1313, ixGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de la Fuente SG, Demaria EJ, Reynolds JD, Portenier DD, Pryor AD (2007) New developments in surgery: natural transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Arch Surg 142:295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Hogle NJ, Durak E, Fowler D (2008) Multimedia article: transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laparoscopically assisted. Surg Endosc 22:1715–1716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gumbs AA, Fowler D, Milone L, Evanko JC, Ude AO, Stevens P, Bessler M (2009) Transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery cholecystectomy: early evolution of the technique. Ann Surg 249:908–912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castellucci SA, Curcillo PG, Ginsberg PC, Saba S, Jaffe J, Harmon JD (2008) Single-port-access adrenalectomy. J Endourol 22(8):1573–1576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    King SA, Atogho A, Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG (2009) Single-port-access (SPA): bilateral oopherectomy and hysterectomy. Laparoscopy Today, The Green Issue 7(2):26Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, King SA, Curcillo PG (2009) Single-port-access surgery (SPA) gastrostomy tube in patients unable to receive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Surg Endosc 23(5):1142–1145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curcillo PG, Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ (2008) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy. Gasteroenterology 134:A-858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Podolsky ER, Curcillo PG (2009) Single-port-access (SPA) surgery of the alimentary tract: 18 months experience with a single umbilical approach. Gasteroenterology 136:A-869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A, Rao PP (2008) The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB Surg 10:336–340Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nguyen NT, Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Wilson SE (2009) Laparoscopic transumbilical cholecystectomy without visible abdominal scars. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1125–1128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print December 25. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0786-7
  16. 16.
    Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23(7):1419–1427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross S, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: the first 100 patients. Am Surg 75:681–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petrotos AC, Molinelli BM (2009) Single-incision multiport laparoendoscopic (SIMPLE) surgery: early evaluation of SIMPLE cholecystectomy in a community setting. Surg Endosc. Epub ahead of print March 6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0369-7
  19. 19.
    Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) Analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Curcillo PG, King SA, Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ (2009) Single-port-access (SPA, minimal-access surgery through a single incision). Surg Technol Int 18:19–25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Curcillo PG, King SA, Podolsky ER, Mouhlas A, Poor A, Wu A (2009) Single-port-access (SPA) surgery technique using a novel laparoscopic single incision approach (online video and abstract). Surg Endosc. Epub December 8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0752-4
  22. 22.
    Olsen D (1997) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:133–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rossi RL, Schirmer WJ, Braasch JW et al (1992) Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: risk factors, recognition, and repair. Arch Surg 127:596–602PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strasberg SM (2008) Error traps and vasculobiliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15:284–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and occult gallbladder cancer. Surg Endosc. Epub January 7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0843-2
  27. 27.
    Gibbs KE, Kaleya RN (2009) Incidental gallbladder cancer and laparoscopic single incision cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23:1680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryDrexel University College of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations