Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp 2567–2574 | Cite as

Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective comparative analysis

  • Andre Chow
  • Sanjay Purkayastha
  • Jean Nehme
  • Lord Ara Darzi
  • Paraskevas ParaskevaEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) may further reduce the trauma of surgery leading to reduced port site complications and postoperative pain. The improved cosmetic result also may lead to improved patient satisfaction with surgery.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed for all patients who underwent SILS appendicectomy at our institution and were compared with those who had undergone conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy during the same time period. This included patient demographic data, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes.

Results

Thirty-three patients underwent conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy and 40 patients underwent SILS appendicectomy between January 26, 2008 and July 14, 2009. Operative time was shorter with SILS appendicectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy (p < 0.05). No patients in the SILS appendicectomy group required conversion to open surgery compared with two patients in the conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy group. Patients stayed an average of 1.36 days after SILS appendicectomy, and 2.36 days after conventional laparoscopic appendicectomy.

Discussion

SILS appendicectomy seems to be a safe and efficacious technique. Further work in the form of randomized studies is required to investigate any significant advantages of this new and attractive technique.

Keywords

Single incision laparoscopic surgery Appendicectomy SILS Retrospective analysis 

Notes

Disclosures

Andre Chow, Sanjay Purkayastha, Jean Nehme, Ara Darzi, and Paraskevas Paraskeva have no conflicts of interest of financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer J (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treatment Rev 34(6):498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online) (4):CD006231Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kurokawa Y, Katai H, Fukuda H, Sasako M (2008) Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38(7):501–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shehzad K, Mohiuddin K, Nizami S, Sharma H, Khan IM, Memon B et al (2007) Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol 16(2):85–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carr SR, Luketich JD (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. An update on the options available. Minerva Chir 63(6):481–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wheeless CR Jr (1972) Outpatient laparoscope sterilization under local anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 39(5):767–770PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA III (1992) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single-umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med 37(9):777–784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12(2):177–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rispoli G, Armellino MF, Esposito C (2002) One-trocar appendectomy. Surg Endosc 16(5):833–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacDonald ER, Ahmed I (2009) Another step toward scarless surgery. Arch Surg 144(6):593–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(5):695CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Nguyen NT (2008) Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 18(11):1492–1494CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23(10):1013–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 144(2):173–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rane A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology 72(2):260–263 discussion 263–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc 24(3):709–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P (2009) Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): The first UK experience. Surg Innov 16(3):211–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowrey DJ, Blom D, Crookes PF, Bremner CG, Johansson JL, Lord RV et al (2001) Risk factors and the prevalence of trocar site herniation after laparoscopic fundoplication. Surgical Endosc 15(7):663–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, Harvey EJ, Afthinos J, Kim GJ et al (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg 144(8):734–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40(5):428–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surgical Endosc 22(2):542–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22(6):1427–1429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palmer R (1984) Why the laparoscopic route for tubal sterilization? Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris) 12(7–8):931–933Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Slim K, Launay-Savary MV (2008) NOTES, the debate continues. Surg Endosc 22(10):2326 author reply 2327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) From single-port access to laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24(1):234–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pugliese R, Forgione A, Sansonna F, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2009) Hybrid NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: operative and long-term results after 18 cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg July 9 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andre Chow
    • 1
  • Sanjay Purkayastha
    • 1
  • Jean Nehme
    • 1
  • Lord Ara Darzi
    • 1
  • Paraskevas Paraskeva
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of SurgeryImperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital CampusLondonUK

Personalised recommendations