Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic colorectal resections
- 529 Downloads
- 57 Citations
Abstract
Background
The increasing use of laparoscopic techniques for colorectal resections means that the issue of postoperative analgesia needs to be reassessed. This nonrandomized comparative study aimed to assess the efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in laparoscopic colorectal resections.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections were used. Analgesia usage and outcome data for patients who had a TAP block and a postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia pump (PCA) were compared with those for patients who had a PCA alone.
Results
Data for 74 patients were used in the final analysis (40 TAP/PCA and 34 PCA alone). There was a significant reduction in overall intravenous opiate use in the TAP/PCA group (31.3 vs. 51.8 mg; P = 0.03). The TAP/PCA group showed a slight trend toward a shorter hospital stay (3 vs. 4 days; P = 0.17) but no difference in postoperative complications or any other outcome measure. There was no procedure-related morbidity relating to the use of TAP blocks.
Conclusions
It appears that TAP blocks reduce postoperative analgesia use of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections within an enhanced recovery program, and this may have an impact on their postoperative hospital length of stay.
Keywords
Analgesia Colorectal LaparoscopicNotes
Disclosures
Drs Philip Conaghan, Charles Maxwell-Armstrong, Nigel Bedforth, Chris Gornall, Bryn Baxendale, Li-lin Hong, Hyun-Mi Carty, and Austin G Acheson have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
References
- 1.Wall PDMR (ed) (1999) Pain measurements in persons in pain, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
- 2.Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:921–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB (2000) Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV, and pain after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001893Google Scholar
- 4.King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, Franks PJ, Longman RJ, Kendrick AH, Kipling RM, Kennedy RH (2006) Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sinnatamby C (2006) Last’s anatomy, 11th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- 6.McDonnell JG, O’Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG (2007) The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 104:193–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.O’Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ (2006) The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31:91PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.McDonnell JG, O’Donnell BD, Farrell T, Gough N, Tuite D, Power C, Laffey JG (2007) Transversus abdominis plane block: a cadaveric and radiological evaluation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 32:399–404PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Bonnet F, Marret E (2005) Influence of anaesthetic and analgesic techniques on outcome after surgery. Br J Anaesth 95:52–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kehlet H (1989) Surgical stress: the role of pain and analgesia. Br J Anaesth 63:189–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Capdevila X, Barthelet Y, Biboulet P, Ryckwaert Y, Rubenovitch J, d’Athis F (1999) Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery. Anesthesiology 91:8–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kehlet H, Holte K (2001) Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth 87:62–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Shibata Y, Sato Y, Fujiwara Y, Komatsu T (2007) Transversus abdominis plane block. Anesth Analg 105:883; author replyCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kehlet H (2008) Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 371:791–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245:867–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS (2002) Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:1276–1282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Block BM, Liu SS, Rowlingson AJ, Cowan AR, Cowan JA Jr, Wu CL (2003) Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 290:2455–2463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P (2002) Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 97:540–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zutshi M, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Mekhail N, Lewis B, Connor JT, Fazio VW (2005) Randomized controlled trial comparing the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet pathway versus the controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet with preemptive epidural anesthesia/analgesia after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Am J Surg 189:268–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Dugan A, Fazio VW (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg 90:1195–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar