Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 2293–2298

Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER)

  • S. J. Phee
  • K. Y. Ho
  • D. Lomanto
  • S. C. Low
  • V. A. Huynh
  • A. P. Kencana
  • K. Yang
  • Z. L. Sun
  • S. C. Sydney Chung
Article

Abstract

Background

The lack of triangulation of standard endoscopic devices limits the degree of freedom for surgical maneuvers during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). This study explored the feasibility of adapting an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) the authors developed to facilitate wedge hepatic resection in NOTES.

Methods

The MASTER consists of a master controller, a telesurgical workstation, and a slave manipulator that holds two end-effectors: a grasper, and a monopolar electrocautery hook. The master controller is attached to the wrist and fingers of the operator and connected to the manipulator by electrical and wire cables. Movements of the operator are detected and converted into control signals driving the slave manipulator via a tendon-sheath power transmission mechanism allowing nine degrees of freedom. Using this system, wedge hepatic resection was performed through the transgastric route on two female pigs under general anesthesia. Entry into the peritoneal cavity was via a 10-mm incision made on the anterior wall of the stomach by the electrocautery hook. Wedge hepatic resection was performed using the robotic grasper and hook. Hemostasis was achieved with the electrocautery hook. After the procedure, the resected liver tissue was retrieved through the mouth using the grasper.

Results

Using the MASTER, transgastric wedge hepatic resection was successfully performed on two pigs with no laparoscopic assistance. The entire procedure took 9.4 min (range, 8.5–10.2 min), with 7.1 min (range, 6–8.2 min) spent on excision of the liver tissue. The robotics-controlled device was able to grasp, retract, and excise the liver specimen successfully in the desired plane.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated for the first time that the MASTER could effectively mitigate the technical constraints normally encountered in NOTES procedures. With it, the triangulation of surgical tools and the manipulation of tissue became easy, and wedge hepatic resection could be accomplished successfully without the need for assistance using laparoscopic instruments.

Keywords

Hepatic tissue resection Laparoscopic surgery Minimally invasive surgery Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery Robotics Surgical technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Lomanto D, Dhir U, So JB, Cheah WK, Moe MA, Ho KY (2009) Total transvaginal endoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair: a NOTES survival study. Hernia 13(4):415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raman JD, Bergs RA, Fernandez R, Bagrodia A, Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA (2009) Complete transvaginal NOTES nephrectomy using magnetically anchored instrumentation. J Endourol 23:367–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Coumaros D, Marescaux J (2008) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: transgastric cholecystectomy in a survival porcine model. Surg Endosc 22:1126–1130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leroy J, Cahill RA, Perretta S, Forgione A, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) applied totally to sigmoidectomy: an original technique with survival in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 23:24–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gettman MT, Blute ML (2007) Transvesical peritoneoscopy: initial clinical evaluation of the bladder as a portal for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 82:843–845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, Chung SSC, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Pasricha PJ, Scorpio DG, Magee CA, Pipitone LJ, Kalloo AN (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61:449–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merrifield BF, Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2006) Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs. Gastrointest Endosc 63:693–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swain P (2008) Nephrectomy and natural orifice translumenal endoscopy (NOTES): transvaginal, transgastric, transrectal, and transvesical approaches. J Endourol 22:811–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanström LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc. 21:1870–1874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (2006) White paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiu PW, Lau JY, Ng EK, Lam CC, Hui M, To KF, Sung JJ, Chung SS (2008) Closure of a gastrotomy after transgastric tubal ligation by using the Eagle Claw VII: a survival experiment in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 68:554–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mellinger JD, MacFadyen BV, Kozarek RA, Soper ND, Birkett DH, Swanstrom LL (2007) Initial experience with a novel endoscopic device allowing intragastric manipulation and plication. Surg Endosc. 21:1002–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Seaman DL, Gostout CJ, de la Mora Levy JG, Knipschield MA (2006) Tissue anchors for transmural gut-wall apposition. Gastrointest Endosc 64:577–581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ho KY, Phee SJ, So BYJ, Chung SCS (2007) Robotic manipulator for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 65:AB110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Phee SJ, Low SC, Sun ZL, Ho KY, Huang WM, Thant ZM (2008) Robotic system for no-scar gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Med Robot 4:15–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Low SC, Tang SW, Thant ZM, Phee L, Ho KY, Chung SC (2006) Master-slave robotic system for therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:3850–3853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bardaro SJ, Swanström L (2006) Development of advanced endoscopes for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15:378–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oleynikov D (2008) Robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 88:1121–1130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Phee
    • 1
  • K. Y. Ho
    • 2
    • 3
  • D. Lomanto
    • 4
  • S. C. Low
    • 1
  • V. A. Huynh
    • 1
  • A. P. Kencana
    • 1
  • K. Yang
    • 1
  • Z. L. Sun
    • 1
  • S. C. Sydney Chung
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of MedicineYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of MedicineNational University HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations