Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 2085–2091 | Cite as

Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study

  • Massimiliano Fabozzi
  • Rosaldo Allieta
  • Riccardo Brachet Contul
  • Manuela Grivon
  • Paolo Millo
  • Elena Lale-Murix
  • Mario NardiJr.



This study aimed to compare the short- and medium-term results obtained by totally laparoscopic right colectomy (TL) with those obtained by laparoscopically assisted right colectomy (LAC) for the treatment of right colon cancer.


A retrospective study compared two nonstatistically different groups (50 TL and 50 LAC cases) managed for nonmetastatic malignant tumors. The study outcomes included operative time, length of minilaparotomy, intraoperative complications, postoperative pain, time to resumption of the gastrointestinal functions, permanence of abdominal drain, analgesic therapy duration, postoperative complications, hospitalization time, number of harvested lymph nodes, and distant metastases onset.


The mean operative times were 78 ± 25 min (TL group) and 92 ± 22 min (LAC group) (p < 0.05). The findings showed a lower postoperative pain level associated with a reduction in analgesic consumption (p > 0.05) and earlier restoration of digestive function in the TL group than in the LAC group. The mean hospital stays were approximately 5 days (TL) and 7 days (LAC) (p < 0.05). No complications occurred either intra- or postoperatively, and similarly, the TL group experienced no mortality. In comparison, the LAC group had a 30% complication rate (p < 0.05). The complications included one case of intraoperative small bowel lesion, three cases of postoperative respiratory infections, three cases of anastomotic leakage, two cases of intestinal occlusion, three cases of minilaparotomy infection, one case of postoperative femoral neurosis, one case of postoperative heart attack, and one case of postoperative pancreatitis. The mortality rate was 0%. Neither group had a recurrence of the neoplastic disease during a 4-year follow-up period.


The findings seem to demonstrate that TL right colectomy is feasible and safe, yielding results comparable with those of the open approach but offering improved postoperative patient comfort. The limits of this retrospective comparative study do not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn despite the encouraging data for the next prospective randomized studies.


Intracorporeal anastomosis Laparoscopic right colectomy Laparoscopically assisted right colectomy 



Massimiliano Fabozzi, Rosaldo Allieta, Riccardo Brachet Contul, Manuela Grivon, Paolo Millo, Elena Lale-Murix, and Mario Nardi Jr have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Bretagnol F, Alves A, Panis Y (2007) Tecnica della colectomia destra in laparoascopia. Encycl Méd Chir (EMC). Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale, pp 40–563Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liang JT, Lai HS, Lee PH (2007) Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1878–1879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG, Li JW, Wang ML, Mao ZH, Hu YY, Dong F, Hu WG, Li DH, Zang L, Peng YF, Yu BM (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11:323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD003432Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kahnamoui K, Cadeddu M, Farrokhyar F, Anvari M (2007) Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a systematic review. Can J Surg 50:48–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lelong B, Bege T, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Delpero JR (2007) Colon cancer and laparoscopy: state of the art in 2007. Bull Cancer 94:1053–1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shatari T, Fujita M, Nozawa K, Haku K, Niimi M, Ikeda Y, Kann S, Kodaira S (2003) Vascular anatomy for right colon lymphadenectomy. Surg Radiol Anat 25:86–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Netter FH; Atlante di Anatomia Fisiopatologia e Clinica (2002) Anatomia Fisiopatologia e clinica del Colon destro. Vol 6. Tomo 2. Ed. Elsevier Masson, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramacciato G, D’Angelo F, Aurello P, Nigri G, Valabrega S, Pezzoli F, Ravaioli M, Cescon M, Cucchetti A, Lauro A, Del Gaudio M, Ercolani G (2008) Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs open technique. Chir Ital 60:1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, Tang WL, Yau KK, Cheung HY, Wong JC, Li MK (2007) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 246:728–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Casciola L, Ceccarelli G, Di Zitti L, Valeri R, Bellochi R, Bartoli A, Barbieri F, Spaziani A, D’Ajello M (2003) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis: technical aspects and personal experience. Minerva Chir 58:621–627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raftopoulos I, Courcoulas AP, Blumberg D (2006) Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon? Surgery 140:675–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergamaschi R, Schochet E, Haughn C, Burke M, Reed JF, Arnaud JP (2008) Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1350–1355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kehlet H (2009) Multimodal approach to postoperative recovery. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:355–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D, Chinswangwatanakul V, Akaraviputh T, Lert-Akyamanee N (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopically assisted vs transverse-incision open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 5:49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakamura T, Mitomi H, Ihara A, Onozato W, Sato T, Ozawa H, Hatade K, Watanabe M (2008) Risk factors for wound infection after surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg 32:1138–1141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2006) Laparoscopic vs hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:464–469CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Bemelman WA (2008) Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:1769–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li JC, Hon SS, Ng SS, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Leung KL (2009) The learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy: experience of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit. Surg Endosc 23:1603–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koopmann MC, Heise CP (2008) Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease. Surg Clin North Am 88:1047–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Massimiliano Fabozzi
    • 1
  • Rosaldo Allieta
    • 1
  • Riccardo Brachet Contul
    • 1
  • Manuela Grivon
    • 1
  • Paolo Millo
    • 1
  • Elena Lale-Murix
    • 1
  • Mario NardiJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryAosta Valley Regional Hospital “Umberto Parini”AostaItaly

Personalised recommendations