Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 2031–2038 | Cite as

Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years

  • P. T. CherianEmail author
  • G. Goussous
  • F. Ashori
  • A. Sigurdsson



Gastric band erosion is a well-reported complication after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The published literature is limited and inconclusive with regard to its management. The authors therefore reviewed all band erosions detected during a 5-year period in a high-volume bariatric practice. Because a significant proportion of the band insertions (65%) were undertaken by an operator beyond his learning curve, the authors hoped to gain a mature, comprehensive understanding of this significant complication.


The authors retrospectively reviewed the operative log of the operating theaters in their obesity surgery unit to find all the operations performed on LAGB patients for erosion from January 2003 to December 2007. The clinical notes and electronic records for each patient were reviewed. These data were cross-referenced against the authors’ obesity surgery database, and denominator data such as the total number operations performed and demographics were found. Finally, postoperative outcomes were collated from the outpatient follow-up data and telephonic interviews, and the results were analyzed.


From January 2003 to December 2007, a single surgeon performed 865 LAGBs in the authors’ unit. The authors identified 18 operations performed for LAGB erosions. The 18 patients (one referred from elsewhere, 14 women) formed the final study cohort (median preoperative body mass index [BMI], 46 kg/m2). Of the 17 erosions, 15 occurred relatively early in the series. The patients with the 213 Swedish adjustable gastric bands experienced 12 erosions (incidence, 5.6%) compared with 6 erosions with the 652 LAP-BANDs (incidence, 0.9%). The median time to presentation was 7 months (range, 1–60 months). However, 55% of the erosions (n = 10) occurred within the first year, and only 10% occurred after the second year. The most common presenting symptom was pain followed by weight regain. None of the patients experienced peritonitis. After surgical management of the erosion, three patients had a second LAGB and at this writing are well. Of the remaining patients, 11 are well, but 6 of these patients have returned to their previous weight (4 patients were lost to follow-up evaluation).


The overall incidence of LAGB erosions in our series was 1.96%. This incidence fell with increasing experience to 0.5% after the initial 300 bands were excluded from the analysis (3 band erosions in the last 565 band insertions). However, further increases in incidence are likely with a longer follow-up period. The most common presentation was abdominal pain followed by weight regain and port-site sepsis. In the authors’ hands, laparoscopic omental plugging and band removal through a separate anterior gastrotomy appear to be effective methods for dealing with band erosions. Band erosion is a significant source of morbidity, with at least one-third of the erosion patients in our series not achieving their final goal of weight loss despite appropriate treatment. This study highlights the need for a future prospective randomized study to clarify the apparent strong influence of band design and construction on the etiopathogenesis of band erosion.


Band erosion Band migration Gastric banding Incidence Laparoscopy Management 



P. T. Cherian, G. Goussous, F. Ashori, A. Sigurdsson have no conflict of interests or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    James PT, Rigby N, Leach R (2004) The obesity epidemic, metabolic syndrome and future prevention strategies. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehab 11:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan L (2003) Presentation at Digestive Disease Week 2003, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    York DA, Rössner S, Caterson I, Chen CM, James WP, Kumanyika S, Martorell R, Vorster HH (2004) Prevention conference VII: obesity, a worldwide epidemic related to heart disease and stroke: group I: worldwide demographics of obesity. Circulation 110:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rao AD, Ramalingam G (2006) Exsanguinating hemorrhage following gastric erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg 16:1675–1678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bueter M, Thalheimer A, Mayer D, Fein M (2006) Band erosion and passage, causing small bowel obstruction. Obes Surg 16:1679–1682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bueter M, Maroske J, Thalheimer A, Gasser M, Stingl T, Heimbucher J, Meyer D, Fuchs KH, Fein M (2008) Short- and long-term results of laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:199–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abu-Abeid S, Szold A (2001) Laparoscopic management of lAP-BAND erosion. Obes Surg 11:87–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westling A, Bjurling K, Ohrvall M, Gustavsson S (1998) Silicone-adjustable gastric banding: disappointing results. Obes Surg 8:467–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikhail S, Caiazzo R, Amalsteen L, Andrieux S, Maunoury V, Dezfoulian G, Boitard J, Verkindt H, Romon M, Pattou F (2009) Transgastric band migration after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: long-term incidence appears higher than expected. Abstract from the 3rd congress of the international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders, Capri, Italy. Obes Surg 18(Suppl 1):110Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cherian PT, Goususs G, Ashori F, Sigurdsson A (2009) Management of band erosion with omental plugging: case series of an operative technique from a 5-year laparoscopic gastric banding experience. Abstract from the 14th congress of the European association of endoscopic surgeons, Stockholm, Sweden. Surg Endosc 23(Suppl 1):840Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organisation (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organ Technical Report Series 894:i–xii, 1–253Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Favretti F, Segato G, Ashton D, Busetto L, De Luca M, Mazza M, Ceoloni A, Banzato O, Calo E, Enzi G (2007) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg 17:168–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Mozzi E, Gazzano G, Francese M, Antonini I, Radaelli S, Roviaro G (2006) Histologic study of tissue reaction to the gastric band: does it contribute to the problem of band erosion? Obes Surg 16:1155–1159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Forsell P, Hallerback B, Glise H, Hellers G (1999) Complications following Swedish adjustable gastric banding: a long-term follow-up. Obes Surg 9:11–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meir E, Van Baden M (1999) Laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding and band erosion: personal experience and hypothesis. Obes Surg 9:191–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abu-Abeid S, Keidar A, Gavert N, Blanc A, Szold A (2003) The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 17:861–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mittermair RP, Weiss H, Nehoda H, Aigner F (2002) Uncommon intragastric migration of Swedish adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg 12:372–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Rubesova E, Muls V, Gaudissart Q, Moschopoulos C, Cadière GB (2005) Intragastric band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: imaging characteristics of an underreported complication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:109–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rojas-Ortegas S, Marin-Lopez E (2002) Gastric band complication in morbid obesity. Revista de Gastroenterología de México 67:214Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dukhno O, Ovnat A, Levy I (2003) Our experience with 250 laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric bandings. Surg Endosc 17:601–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lucchese M, Alessio F, Valeri A, Cantelli G, Venneri F, Borrelli D (1999) Adjustable gastric banding: advantages and disadvantages. Obes Surg 9:269–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baldinger R, Mluench R, Steffen R, Ricklin TP, Reidtmann HJ, Horber FF (2001) Conservative management of intragastric migration of Swedish adjustable gastric band by endoscopic retrieval. Gastrointest Endosc 53:98–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Campos J (2007) Hypovolemic shock due to intragastric migration of an adjustable gastric band. Obes Surg 17:562–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Egbeare DM, Myers AF, Lawrance RJ (2008) Small bowel obstruction secondary to intragastric erosion and migration of a gastric band. J Gastrointest Surg 12:983–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lattuada E, Zappa MA, Mozzi E, Fichera G, Granilli P, De Ruberto F, Antonini I, Radaelli S, Rouiaro G (2007) Band erosion following gastric banding: how to treat it. Obes Surg 17:329–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abu-Abeid S, Zohar DB, Sagie B, Klausner J (2005) Treatment of intragastric band migration following laparoscopic banding: safety and feasibility of simultaneous laparoscopic band removal and replacement. Obes Surg 15:849–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cunneen SA, Phillips E, Fielding G, Banel D, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Sledge I (2008) Studies of Swedish adjustable gastric band and LAP-BAND: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Rel Dis 4:174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fried M (2008) The current science of gastric banding: an overview of pressure-volume theory in band adjustments. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:S14–S21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. T. Cherian
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • G. Goussous
    • 1
  • F. Ashori
    • 1
  • A. Sigurdsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Shropshire Upper GI and Laparoscopic Surgery UnitPrincess Royal HospitalTelfordEngland
  2. 2.Institute of Liver StudiesKing’s College HospitalDenmark Hill, LondonEngland

Personalised recommendations