Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 1679–1685 | Cite as

The impact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Asians

  • Ji Won Park
  • Sang-Woo Lim
  • Hyo Seong Choi
  • Seung-Yong Jeong
  • Jae Hwan Oh
  • Seok-Byung Lim



The influence of obesity on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Asian patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery in obese Asian patients with colorectal cancer.


We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data on 984 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between May 2001 and February 2008. Patients were classified according to the categories proposed by the International Obesity Task Force, as Nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 25.0 kg/m2), Obese I (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and Obese II (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Surgical outcomes, including open conversion, operation time, postoperative complications, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay, were compared in Nonobese, Obese I, and Obese II patients.


Of the 984 patients, 645 (65.5%), 312 (31.7%), and 27 (2.7%), were classified as Nonobese, Obese I, and Obese II, respectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics were similar among the three groups. The Obese II group had higher conversion rates (14.8% versus 2.6% and 2.9%, P = 0.001), longer operation time (258 versus 201 and 215 min, P = 0.001), and longer postoperative hospital stay (12.1 versus 9.5 and 9.2 days, P = 0.035) than the Nonobese and Obese I groups. However, the rates of intraoperative events (P = 0.634) and postoperative complications (P = 0.603) were similar in nonobese and obese patients. Independent risk factors for conversion were BMI group and operation type. Obese II patients had an 8.36-fold greater risk of conversion than had Nonobese patients (P = 0.001).


With sufficient experience, laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese Asian patients is feasible and safe, offering all the benefits of a minimally invasive approach. Management of Asian colorectal cancer patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 requires meticulous perioperative care, and colorectal surgeons must be familiar with obesity-related challenges in such patients.


Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic surgery Body mass index Asian Obesity 



Drs. Ji Won Park, Sang-Woo Lim, Hyo Seong Choi, Seung-Yong Jeong, Jae Hwan Oh, and Seok-Byung Lim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Senagore A, Delaney C, Madboulay K, KM Brady, Fazio VW (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7:558–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, Martinez S, Chen W, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2002) Is obesity a high risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16:855–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tuech J, Regenet N, Hennekinne S, Pessaux P, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2001) Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and non obese patients: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 15:1427–1430PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leroy J, Ananian P, Rubino F, Claudon B, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2005) The impact of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy. Ann Surg 241:69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delaney CP, Pokala N, Senagore AJ, Casillas S, Kiran RP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2005) Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index > 30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:975–981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dostalík J, Martínek L, Vávra P, Andel P, Gunka I, Gunková P (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients. Obes Surg 15:1328–1331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scheidbach H, Benedix F, Hügel O, Kose D, Köckerling F, Lippert H (2008) Laparoscopic approach to colorectal procedures in the obese patient: risk factor or benefit? Obes Surg 18:66–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loffer FD, Pent D (1976) Laparoscopy in the obese patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125:104–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    WHO Expert Consultation (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 363:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization, International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force (2000) The Asia–Pacific perspective redefining obesity and its treatment. Health Communications, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stevens J, Nowicki EM (2003) Body mass index and mortality in Asian populations: implications for obesity cut-points. Nutr Rev 61:104–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim DM, Ahn CW, Nam SY (2005) Prevalence of obesity in Korea. Obes Rev 6:117–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Korea Central Cancer Registry, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs (2008) Cancer incidence in Korea. Available at: (Korean) November 2008; Accessed 18 May 2009
  15. 15.
    Lim SB, Choi HS, Jeong SY, Park JG (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic techniques as the surgical approach of choice for primary colorectal cancer: an analysis of 570 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 22:2588–2595CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buchanan GN, Malik A, Parvaiz A, Sheffield JP, Kennedy RH (2008) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:893–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Copeland J, Brown JM, Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsujinaka S, Konishi F, Kawamura YJ, Saito M, Tajima N, Tanaka O, Lefor AT (2008) Visceral obesity predicts surgical outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1757–1765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Seki Y, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Takemasa I, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Monden M (2007) Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index. Surg Endosc 21:929–934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ishii Y, Hasegawa H, Nishibori H, Watanabe M, Kitajima M (2005) Impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcome after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1261–1262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organization. Obesity. Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic (1998) Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lascano CA, Kaidar-Person O, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R, Wexner SD (2006) Challenges of laparoscopic colectomy in the obese patient: a review. Am J Surg 192:357–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Gregoire R, Burpee SE, Pace KT, Poulin EC (2003) Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Fellowship training may be an advantage. Surg Endosc 17:1288–1291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gendall KA, Raniga S, Kennedy R, Frizelle FA (2007) The impact of obesity on outcome after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:2223–2237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, Clavien PA (2003) Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 361:2032–2035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schwandner O, Farke S, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (2004) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: do differences in body mass indices lead to different outcomes? Surg Endosc 18:1452–1456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC Trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji Won Park
    • 1
  • Sang-Woo Lim
    • 1
  • Hyo Seong Choi
    • 1
  • Seung-Yong Jeong
    • 2
  • Jae Hwan Oh
    • 1
  • Seok-Byung Lim
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and HospitalNational Cancer CenterGoyangRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
  3. 3.Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical CenterSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations