Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 1646–1657 | Cite as

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience

  • Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
  • Fabio Sbrana
  • Francesco Maria Bianco
  • Enrique Fernando Elli
  • Galaxy Shah
  • Pietro Addeo
  • Giuseppe Caravaglios
  • Andrea Coratti



Use of robotic surgery has gained increasing acceptance over the last few years. There are few reports, however, on advanced pancreatic robotic surgery. In fact, the indication for robotic surgery in pancreatic disease has been controversial. This paper retrospectively reviews one surgeon’s experience with robotic surgery to treat pancreatic disease, and analyzes its indications and outcomes, as well as the controversy that exists.


A retrospective review of the charts of all patients who underwent robotic surgery for pancreatic disease by a single surgeon at two different institutions was carried out.


From October 2000 to January 2009, 134 patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery for different pancreatic pathologies. All procedures were performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Of the 134 patients, 83 were female. The average age of all patients was 57 years (range 24–86 years). Mean operating room (OR) time was 331 min (75–660 min). There were 14 conversions to open surgery. Mean length of stay was 9.3 days (3–85 days). Length of stay for patients with no complications was 7.9 days (3–15 days). The postoperative morbidity rate was 26% and the mortality rate was 2.23% (three patients). Among the procedures performed were 60 pancreaticoduodenectomies, 23 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies, 23 splenopancreatectomies, 3 middle pancreatectomies, 1 total pancreatectomy, and 3 enucleations. Another 21 patients underwent different surgical procedures for treatment of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Two cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy were performed in outside institutions and are not included in this series.


This is the largest series of robotic pancreatic surgery presented to date. Robotic surgery enables difficult technical maneuvers to be performed that facilitate the success of pancreatic minimally invasive surgery. The results in this series demonstrate that it is feasible and safe. Complication and mortality rates are comparable to those of open surgery but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.


Robotic surgery Pancreatic resection Chronic pancreatitis Distal pancreatectomy Minimally invasive surgery 



Dr. Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti MD, Dr. Fabio Sbrana MD, Dr. Francesco Maria Bianco MD, Dr. Enrique Fernando Elli MD, Dr. Galaxy Shah MD, Dr. Pietro Addeo MD, Dr. Giuseppe Caravaglios MD, and Dr. Andrea Coratti MD have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.


  1. 1.
    Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MD, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2006) 1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10(9):1199–1211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Abrams RA, Hruban RH (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236(3):355–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Levi S, Lopez-Boado MA, Navarro S (2007) Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg 11(12):1607–1622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(1):33–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanly EJ, Talamini MA (2004) Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):19S–26SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20(7):1045–1050CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melvin WS (2003) Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. Am J Surg 186(3):274–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr (2008) Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg 32(3):419–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, Hermanek P, Sulkowski U, Becker H, Schafmayer A, Baca I, Lorenz D, Meister R et al (1992) Role of octreotide in the prevention of postoperative complications following pancreatic resection. Am J Surg 163(1):125–130 discussion 130–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, Brunt LM, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2007) Outcome analysis of laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 21(4):579–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajapandian S, Madhankumar MV (2007) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 205(2):222–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg 1(1):20–25 discussion 25–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GR, Neal CP, Peterson M, Cameron IC, Berry DP (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resections. J Gastrointest Surg 2009 Jan 7 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20(10):1521–1525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fernandez-Cruz L, Orduna D, Cesar-Borges G, Angel Lopez-Boado M (2005) Distal pancreatectomy: en bloc splenectomy vs. spleen preserving pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 7(2):93–98Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fernandez Cruz L, Cesar-Borges G, Lopez-Boado MA, Orduna D, Navarro S (2005) Minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas in progress. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390(4): 342–354. Epub 2005 Jul 6Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin RC 2nd, Scoggins CR, Ahmad S, Kim HJ, Park J, Johnston F, Strouch MJ, Menze A, Rymer J, McClaine R, Strasberg SM, Talamonti MS, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lowy AM, Byrd-Sellers J, Wood WC, Hawkins WG (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparision of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248(3):438–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS, Bassi C, Delvaux G, Weerts J, Fabre JM, Boulez J, Baulieux J, Peix JL, Gigot JF, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Section (HBPS) of the Royal Belgian Society of Surgery, Belgian Group for Endoscopic Surgery (BGES), Club Coelio (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137(6):597–605Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sa Cunha A, Rault A, Beau C, Laurent C, Collet D, Masson B (2008) A single institution prospective study of laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Arch Surg 143(3):289–295 discussion 295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matsumoto T, Shibata K, Ohta M, Iwaki K, Uchida H, Yada K, Mori M, Kitano S (2008) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy: a nonrandomized comparative study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18(4):340–343CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
    • 1
  • Fabio Sbrana
    • 1
  • Francesco Maria Bianco
    • 1
  • Enrique Fernando Elli
    • 1
  • Galaxy Shah
    • 1
  • Pietro Addeo
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Caravaglios
    • 2
  • Andrea Coratti
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryOspedale MisericordiaGrossetoItaly

Personalised recommendations