Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 1552–1556 | Cite as

Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones

  • Faisal Hanif
  • Zubir Ahmed
  • M. Abdel Samie
  • Ahmad H. M. NassarEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to explore the role of transcystic bile duct exploration (TCE) as a first line of treatment for patients with suspected or incidental common bile duct (CBD) stones.

Methods

A prospective, case-control study of clinically comparable groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) alone (n = 1,854) and combined LC/TCE for CBD stones (n = 253) under the care of one surgeon was performed. Other than ultrasonography, no routine preoperative imaging was used; however, we performed routine intraoperative cholangiography on all patients.

Results

There was no difference in age (49 ± 15 vs. 57 ± 19, p = 0.7), sex (79% vs. 82% females, p = 0.6), and ASA grade (1.9 ± 1 vs. 1.8 ± 1, p = 0.7). A larger proportion of the TCE group presented as an emergency (TCE 45% vs. LC alone 27%, p = 0.03) and more often presented with acute biliary pain compared with LC alone (27% vs. 13%, p = 0.02). Although a majority of the patients in the TCE group had clinical or biochemical risk factors for CBD stones (86%), only 27% had suspected stones on preoperative ultrasound. The incidence of jaundice (6% vs. 20%, p = 0.01) was lower in the LC alone group compared with TCE patients. Previous abdominal surgery was noted in 34% patients who underwent LC alone and 30% in LC/TCE (p = 0.06). Significantly there was no difference in open conversion between the two groups (LC alone 0.5% vs. LC/TCE 0.6%, p = 0.07). Comparison of selected outcome parameters for LC versus TCE showed a postoperative hospital stay of 2 (1–14) vs. 2 (1–17) days (p = 0.07), presentation to resolution 1 (1–11) vs. 1 (1–11) weeks (p = 0.07), and morbidity 1.07% vs. 1.2% (p = 0.07).

Conclusions

The study advocates single-session laparoscopic cholecystectomy with transcystic CBD exploration as a feasible first choice treatment and the logical next step in the management of patients with CBD stones.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Intraoperative cholangiogram Transcystic CBD exploration Choledochotomy 

Notes

Disclosures

Drs. Faisal Hanif, Zubir Ahmed, Abdel M. Samie, and Ahmad Nassar have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Pitt H (1993) Role of open cholecystectomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Am J Surg 65:483–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hermann R (1989) The spectrum of biliary stone disease. Am J Surg 158:171–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Way LW, Dunphy JE (1972) Management of choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 176:347–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clayton ESJ, Alexakis N et al (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rhodes M, Cohen L et al (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus post operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin DJ, Toouli J (2001) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones [review]. Cochrane Detabase Syst Rev 19(2):CD003327Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poulose BK, Holzman PA (2006) National analysis of in-hospital resources utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 20:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prat F (1996) Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 347:75–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trondsen E, Reiertsen O et al (1998) Prediction of common bile duct stones before cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 133:162–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu TH, Kawashima A et al (2001) Patient evaluation and management with selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 234:33–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joyce WP, Burke GJ et al (1991) Identification of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 78:1174–1176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamouda AH, Khan M, Nassar AH (2007) Intraoperative cholangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 21(6):955–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahmud S, Kasem H, Nassar AH (2001) Radiological treatment of retained bile duct stones following recent surgery using glucagons. Surg Endosc 15(11):1359–1360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lambert ME, Tweedle DEF (1988) Endoscopic removal of retained stones after biliary surgery. Br J Surg 75:896–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins C, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC (2004) A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 239(1):28–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gologan E, Balan G, Stanciu C (2006) Conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of bile duct calculi. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 110(4):824–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Notash AYSJ, Golfam F, Habibi G, Alizadeh K (2008) Preoperative clinical and paraclinical indicators of choledocholithiasis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7(3):304–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strömberg CNM, Leijonmarck CE (2008) Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 22(3):1194–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lyass S, Phillips EH (2006) Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 20(S2): S441–S445Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faisal Hanif
    • 1
  • Zubir Ahmed
    • 1
  • M. Abdel Samie
    • 1
  • Ahmad H. M. Nassar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Monklands Hospital, NHS LanarkshireAirdrieUK

Personalised recommendations