Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1380–1386 | Cite as

Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer

  • Jeongmin Choi
  • Sang Gyun KimEmail author
  • Joo Sung Kim
  • Hyun Chae Jung
  • In Sung Song
Article

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been a useful method for the accurate staging of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of EUS, positron emission tomography (PET), and computed tomography (CT) in the locoregional staging of resectable esophageal cancer.

Methods

A total of 109 patients with resectable esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively reviewed for evaluation of preoperative EUS, PET, and CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of tumor depth (T) staging and regional lymph nodal (N) staging for each test were compared with the postoperative histopathologic stage as the gold standard.

Results

The overall accuracy of EUS for T staging was 72%, and it was the only method for delineating the layers of the esophageal wall. The sensitivities for N staging were 42% for EUS, 49% for PET, and 35% for CT, and their specificities were, respectively, 91, 87, and 93%. The accuracy for N staging was 66% for EUS, 68% for PET, and 63% for CT, and it did not differ significantly across the three tests.

Conclusions

Preoperative EUS for the locoregional staging of esophageal cancer provides excellent T staging accuracy and similar accuracy for N staging compared with PET and CT. Especially in T staging, EUS could play an important role in the choice of candidates for esophageal cancer surgery.

Keywords

Computed tomography Endosonography Esophageal cancer Positron emission tomography Tumor staging 

Notes

Disclosures

Jeongmin Choi, Sang Gyun Kim, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung, and In Sung Song have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to diclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ (2003) Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 349:2241–2252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lowe VJ, Booya F, Fletcher JG, Nathan M, Jensen E, Mullan B, Rohren E, Wiersema MJ, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Murray JA, Allen MS, Levy MJ, Clain JE (2005) Comparison of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound in the initial staging of patients with esophageal cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 7:422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Westreenen HL, Heeren PA, van Dullemen HM, van der Jagt EJ, Jager PL, Groen H, Plukker JT (2005) Positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in a combined staging strategy of esophageal cancer prevents unnecessary surgical explorations. J Gastrointest Surg 9:54–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pfau PR, Perlman SB, Stanko P, Frick TJ, Gopal DV, Said A, Zhang Z, Weigel T (2007) The role and clinical value of EUS in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging program with CT and positron emission tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 65:377–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liberale G, Van Laethem JL, Gay F, Goldman S, Nagy N, Coppens E, Gelin M, El Nakadi I (2004) The role of PET scan in the preoperative management of oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 30:942–947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shimpi RA, George J, Jowell P, Gress FG (2007) Staging of esophageal cancer by EUS: staging accuracy revisited. Gastrointest Endosc 66:475–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rasanen JV, Sihvo EI, Knuuti MJ, Minn HR, Luostarinen ME, Laippala P, Viljanen T, Salo JA (2003) Prospective analysis of accuracy of positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography in staging of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg Oncol 10:954–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi JY, Lee KH, Shim YM, Lee KS, Kim JJ, Kim SE, Kim BT (2000) Improved detection of individual nodal involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus by FDG PET. J Nucl Med 41:808–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Catalano MF, Sivak MV Jr, Rice T, Gragg LA, Van Dam J (1994) Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. Gastrointest Endosc 40:442–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greene FL, American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dwyer AJ (1991) Matchmaking and McNemar in the comparison of diagnostic modalities. Radiology 178:328–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salminen JT, Farkkila MA, Ramo OJ, Toikkanen V, Simpanen J, Nuutinen H, Salo JA (1999) Endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction. Scand J Gastroenterol 34:1178–1182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, Antillon D, Ibdah JA, Antillon MR (2008) Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 14:1479–1490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosch T (1995) Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: a review of literature results. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 5:537–547Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Sahai AV, Van Velse A, Hoffman BJ (2000) Dilation of malignant esophageal stenosis to allow EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration: safety and effect on patient management. Gastrointest Endosc 51:309–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Dam J, Rice TW, Catalano MF, Kirby T, Sivak MV Jr (1993) High-grade malignant stricture is predictive of esophageal tumor stage: risks of endosonographic evaluation. Cancer 71:2910–2917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfau PR, Ginsberg GG, Lew RJ, Faigel DO, Smith DB, Kochman ML (2000) Esophageal dilation for endosonographic evaluation of malignant esophageal strictures is safe and effective. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2813–2815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eloubeidi MA, Wallace MB, Reed CE, Hadzijahic N, Lewin DN, Van Velse A, Leveen MB, Etemad B, Matsuda K, Patel RS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ (2001) The utility of EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in detecting celiac lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal cancer: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 54:714–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, Antillon MR, Ibdah JA (2008) Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of distal and celiac axis lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Dis Sci 53:2405–2414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luketich JD, Schauer PR, Meltzer CC, Landreneau RJ, Urso GK, Townsend DW, Ferson PF, Keenan RJ, Belani CP (1997) Role of positron emission tomography in staging esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 64:765–769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hsu WH, Hsu PK, Wang SJ, Lin KH, Huang CS, Hsieh CC, Wu YC (2009) Positron emission tomography-computed tomography in predicting locoregional invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1564–1568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Vliet EP, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Hunink MG, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD (2008) Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 98:547–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Norton ID, Clain JE, Wang KK, Affi A, Allen M, Deschamps C, Miller D, Salomao D, Wiersema MJ (2001) Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on lymph node staging in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 53:751–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeongmin Choi
    • 1
  • Sang Gyun Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joo Sung Kim
    • 1
  • Hyun Chae Jung
    • 1
  • In Sung Song
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research InstituteSeoul National University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations