Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy
- 198 Downloads
- 40 Citations
Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic appendectomy via the three-trocar technique is widely used for appendectomy. This report describes the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) appendectomy.
Methods
Between December 2008 and March 2009, patients with acute appendicitis admitted to the General Surgery and Emergency Unit of the authors’ institution who agreed to undergo LESS appendectomy were included in a prospective study. All operations were performed by the same surgical team specially trained in this type of emergency surgery. The umbilicus was the sole point of entry for all patients, and the same operative technique was used in all cases. The data for patients undergoing LESS appendectomy were compared with the data from an uncontrolled group of patients undergoing standard laparoscopic appendectomy during the same study period.
Results
The LESS and standard appendectomy groups included 15 patients each. The LESS procedure was performed successfully for all the patients, and none required conversion to an open procedure or a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy by the addition of more entry ports. The mean operating time of 51 min in the LESS group was not significantly different from the 46 min in the standard laparoscopic appendectomy group.
Conclusions
In this study, LESS appendectomy was technically feasible and safe, representing a reproducible alternative to standard laparoscopic appendectomy.
Keywords
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) Laparoscopic appendectomy One-trocar appendectomy Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) Transumbilical accessNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Covidien Spain, S.L., for logistic support, and to Marta Pulido, MD, for editing of the manuscript and editorial assistance.
References
- 1.Hansson LE, Laurell H, Gunnarsson U (2008) Impact of time in the development of acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 25:394–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, Lesnik A, Blayac PM, Pujol J, Bruel JM, Taourel P (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230:472–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Hong TH, Kim HL, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Lee KH, You YK, Oh SJ, Park SM (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA): scarless intracorporeal appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:75–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Barros R, Frota R, Stein RJ, Turna B, Gill IS, Desai MM (2008) Simultaneous laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and cystectomy: a preliminary report. Int Braz L Urol 34:413–421Google Scholar
- 7.Castellucci SA, Curcillo PG, Ginsberg PC, Saba SC, Jaffe JS, Harmon JD (2008) Single-port access adrenalectomy. J Endourol 22:1573–1576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Merchant AM, Cook MW, White BC, Davis SS, Sweeney JF, Lin E (2008) Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). J Gastrointest Surg 13:159–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, Rao AJ (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. Obes Surg 18:1338–1342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Desai MM, Aron M, Rackley RR, Moore C, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71:3–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K (2007) Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:375–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kala Z, Hanke I, Newmann C (1996) A modified technique in laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy, a transumbilical approach through a single port. Rozhl Chir 75:15–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Praveenraj P (2008) Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique. Endoscopy 40:428–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Rispoli G, Armellino MF, Esposito C (2002) One-trocar appendectomy. Surg Endosc 16:833–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Saber AA, Meslemani AM, Davis R, Pimentel R (2004) Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels. Ann Surg 239:182–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Barry M, Winter DC (2008) Laparoscopic port-site hernias: any port in a storm or a storm in any port? Ann Surg 248:687–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001546Google Scholar
- 20.Tate JJT, Dawson JW, Chung SCS, Lau WY, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hong TH, You YK, Lee KH (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: scarless cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23:1393–1397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar