Surgical Endoscopy

, 24:179 | Cite as

Development and validation of mental practice as a training strategy for laparoscopic surgery

  • Sonal Arora
  • Rajesh Aggarwal
  • Nick Sevdalis
  • Aidan Moran
  • Pramudith Sirimanna
  • Roger Kneebone
  • Ara Darzi
Article

Abstract

Background

Concerns for patient safety have accelerated the need for alternative training strategies outside the operating room. Mental practice (MP: the use of mental imagery to rehearse a task symbolically before performance) has been used successfully in sports and music to enhance skill. This study aimed to develop and validate a MP training strategy for laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

A cognitive “walk through” was conducted for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to identify key visual, cognitive, and kinesthetic cues for the procedure. This was used to develop a MP training protocol featuring an “MP script” to enhance mental imagery of a LC. The script was validated by asking each subject to rehearse mentally a LC within 30 min. Ability to practice this procedure mentally was assessed before and after MP training with a modified version of a validated questionnaire (minimum score, 8; maximum score, 56).

Results

The study was completed by 20 subjects (10 experienced surgeons >100 LCs, 10 novice surgeons <10 LCs). Reliability testing of the questionnaire gave it a Cronbach alpha of 0.984 (n = 20) before MP training and 0.879 (n = 20) after MP training, indicating internal consistency. The construct validity of the questionnaire is supported by the fact that the experienced surgeons scored higher on all the questions than the novices both before and after training. Significant improvement in global imagery score after MP was shown by both experienced (48 before MP vs. 53 after MP; p = 0.007) and novice (15 before MP vs. 42 after MP; p = 0.005) surgeons, suggesting both face and content validity.

Conclusions

This is the first study to develop and validate MP as a novel training approach for laparoscopic surgery. Mental practice may be a time- and cost-effective strategy that improves surgeons’ ability to visualize themselves performing a LC, increasing both their knowledge and confidence.

Keywords

Laparoscopic surgery Mental practice Mental training Surgery Surgical education 

References

  1. 1.
    Department of Health (2006) Good doctors, safer patients—proposal to strengthen the system to assure and improve the performance of doctors and to protect the safety of patients. Department of Health, London, pp 1–202Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tooke J (2008) Aspiring to excellence: final report of the independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. MMC Inquiry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P (2004) Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 91:146–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds) (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16:1746–1752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, Mayer JW, Felner JM, Petrusa ER, Waugh RA, Brown DD, Safford RR, Gessner IH, Gordon DL, Ewy GA (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282:861–866CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kneebone RL, Kidd J, Nestel D, Barnet A, Lo B, King R, Yang GZ, Brown R (2005) Blurring the boundaries: scenario-based simulation in a clinical setting. Med Educ 39:580–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, Cregan P, Hewett PJ, Maddern GJ (2008) A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg 248:166–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM, Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG, Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG (2001) Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 193:660–665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sachdeva AK, Pellegrini CA, Johnson KA (2008) Support for simulation-based surgical education through American College of Surgeons—accredited education institutes. World J Surg 32:196–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A (1994) Does mental practice enhance performance? J Appl Psychol 79:481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin KA, Moritz SE, Hall CR (1999) Imagery use in sport: a literature review and applied model. Sport Psychol 13:245–268Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wohldmann EL, Healy AR, Bourne LE Jr (2008) A mental practice superiority effect. J Exp Psych Learning, Memory Cognition 34:823–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Lange FP, Roelofs K, Toni I (2008) Motor imagery: a window into the mechanisms and alterations of the motor system. Cortex 44:494–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Munzert J, Lorey B, Zentgraf K (2009) Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Rev 60(2):306–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bertollo M, Saltarelli B, Robazza C (2009) Mental preparation strategies of elite modern pentathletes. Psychol Sport Exerc 10:244–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinberg R (2008) Does imagery work? Effects on performance and mental skills. J Imag Res Sport Physical Act 3:1–21Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rogers RG (2006) Mental practice and acquisition of motor skills: examples from sports training and surgical education. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 33:297–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanders CW, Sadoski M, Bramson R, Wiprud R, Van Walsum K (2004) Comparing the effects of physical practice and mental imagery rehearsal on learning basic surgical skills by medical students. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1811–1814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanders CW, Sadoski M, van Walsum K, Bramson R, Wiprud R, Fossum TW (2008) Learning basic surgical skills with mental imagery: using the simulation centre in the mind. Med Educ 42:607–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murphy SM (1994) Imagery interventions in sport. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:486–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Immenroth M, Burger T, Brenner J, Nagelschmidt M, Eberspacher H, Troidl H (2007) Mental training in surgical education: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 245:385–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cumming J, Olphin T, Law M (2007) Self-reported psychological states and physiological responses to different types of motivational general imagery. J Sports Exerc Psychol 29:629–644Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ericsson KA (2006) Protocol analysis and expert thought: concurrent verbalization of thinking during experts’ performance on representative thoughts. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR (eds) The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mays N, Pope C (1995) Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 311:109–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery: a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29:409–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cumming J, Ramsey R (2009) Imagery interventions in sport. In: Mellalieu SD, Hanton S (eds) Advances in applied sport psychology: a review. Routledge, London, pp 5–36Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anshel MH, Weinberg RS (1996) Coping with acute stress among American and Australian basketball referees. J Sport Behav 19:180–203Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fourkas AD, Bonavolonta V, Avenanti A, Aglioti SM (2008) Kinesthetic imagery and tool-specific modulation of corticospinal representations in expert tennis players. Cereb Cortex 18:2382–2390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Feltz D, Landers D (1983) The effect of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a metaanalysis. J Sports Psychol 2:210–220Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hinshaw K (1991) The effects of mental practice on motor skill performance: critical evaluation and metaanalysis. Imagination Cognition Personality 3:11–35Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arora S, Sevdalis N, Woloshynowych M, Nestel D, Kneebone R (2009) Managing intra-operative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training programme? Am J Surg 197(4):537–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonal Arora
    • 1
  • Rajesh Aggarwal
    • 1
  • Nick Sevdalis
    • 1
  • Aidan Moran
    • 2
  • Pramudith Sirimanna
    • 1
  • Roger Kneebone
    • 1
  • Ara Darzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosurgery and Surgical TechnologyImperial College, St. Mary’s HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity CollegeDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations