Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 499–503 | Cite as

Resident training in minimally invasive surgery: a survey of Canadian department and division chairs

  • Beverley Chan
  • Guillaume Martel
  • Eric C. Poulin
  • Joseph Mamazza
  • Robin P. Boushey
Article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to seek the opinions of academic surgical chairs on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) education for general surgery residents and to identify perceived gaps and trends in educational strategies.

Methods

A national survey on attitudes toward MIS was sent to the chairs of departments of surgery and divisions of general surgery across the 16 Canadian academic centers. The survey contained 34 questions consisting of Likert scales, single answers, and multiple-choice questions. Nonresponders were contacted directly. At the time of the survey, two department chair positions were vacant.

Results

The response rate was 87% (26/30). The majority of the centers used early operating room exposure to basic MIS cases (92%) and animal labs (85%). Two-thirds of the institutions used early operating room exposure to advanced MIS cases (69%) and didactic lectures (65%). Half of the academic centers used MIS video (54%) and the laparoscopic virtual reality simulator (54%). The least used method was computer software (19%). The surgical division and department chairs believed the most effective teaching method was early operating room exposure to basic MIS cases (100%), followed by the laparoscopic virtual reality simulator (91%) and animal labs (88%). Computer software was considered 42% useful, and the least useful method was didactic lectures (16%). In the next 5 years, 62% of academic centers plan to add laparoscopic virtual reality simulators to their MIS curriculum.

Conclusion

The chairs’ opinion on the most effective MIS teaching method for residents is basic MIS cases followed by laparoscopic virtual reality simulators. The majority of academic institutions plan to add laparoscopic virtual reality simulators to the curriculum in the next 5 years.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Minimally invasive surgery MIS Residents Simulator Surgical education Survey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Minimally Invasive Research Group at the University of Ottawa is supported by unrestricted educational grants from Covidien Canada and Storz Canada.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fried GM (2005) The Steinberg-Bernstein centre for minimally invasive surgery at McGill University. Surg Innov 12:345–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiasson PM, Pace DE, Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Poulin EC (2003) Minimally invasive surgery training in Canada: a survey of general surgery. Surg Endosc 17:371–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2001) Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess 5:1–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warnock GL (2007) Redeveloping the Canadian operating room for 2020. Can J Surg 50:245–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haluck RS, Marshall RL, Krummel TM, Melkonian MG (2001) Are surgery training programs ready for virtual reality? A survey of program directors in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 193:600–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korndorffer JR, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ (2005) Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg 191:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dankelman J, Vrimbergen CA, Stassen HG (2007) New technologies supporting surgical interventions and training of surgical skills: a look at projects in Europe supporting minimally invasive techniques. IEEE Eng Med Biol 26(May/June):47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basdogan C, Sedef M, Harders M, Wesarg S (2007) VR-based simulators for training in minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 27(March/April):54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stefanidis D, Acker CE, Swiderski D, Heniford BT, Greene FL (2008) Challenges during the implementation of a laparoscopic skills curriculum in a busy general surgery residency program. J Surg Ed 65:4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR (2008) Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 95:1088–1097CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Figert PL, Park AE, Witzke DB, Schwartz RW (2001) Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 193:533–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oostema JA, Abdel MP, Gould JC (2008) Time-efficient laparoscopic skills assessment using an augmented-reality simulator. Surg Endosc 22:2621–2624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Birkmeyer JD, Yellamanchilli RK, Doherty GM, Gauger PG, Minter RM (2006) Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 243:854–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schijven MP, Schout MA, Dolmans VEMG, Hendrikx AJM, Broeders IAMJ, Borel Rinkes IHM (2008) Perceptions of surgical specialists in general surgery, orthopaedic surgery, urology, and gynaecology on teaching endoscopic surgery in the Netherlands. Surg Endosc 22:472–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge DS, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallagher AG, Matt Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses GM, Smith D, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beverley Chan
    • 1
  • Guillaume Martel
    • 1
  • Eric C. Poulin
    • 1
  • Joseph Mamazza
    • 1
  • Robin P. Boushey
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Group, The Ottawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations