Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 270–276

Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery

  • J. Esteban Varela
  • Samuel E. Wilson
  • Ninh T. Nguyen
Article

Abstract

Background

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are nosocomial infectious complications causing significant morbidity, mortality, and hospital costs. Recently, the US Department of Human Health Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services outlined measures intended to decrease and prevent hospital-acquired infections such as SSI. This study aimed to compare the incidence of SSI after laparoscopic and open surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a large administrative, clinical, and financial database (University Health System Consortium) of US Academic Medical Centers and affiliated community hospitals was conducted. Patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 94,665) or open (n = 36,965) appendectomy, cholecystectomy, antireflux surgery, or gastric bypass between 2004 and 2008 were included in the analysis. The main outcome measure was inpatient diagnosis of SSI after laparoscopic and open surgery.

Results

During the 45-month study period, a total of 131,630 patients underwent one of four selected procedures. Overall, the incidence of SSI was significantly lower in laparoscopic (483 of 94,665, 0.5%) than in open (669 of 36,965, 1.8%) surgery (p < 0.01). Largely, laparoscopic techniques offered a protective effect against SSI (odds ratio [OR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–0.31). Patients treated with laparoscopy were 72% less likely to experience an SSI. This protective effect was shown to be sustained after stratification by severity of illness (minor: OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14–0.26; moderate: OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.25–0.35; major/extreme: OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54–0.79), admission status (elective: OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20–0.31; urgent: OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.28–0.53; emergent: OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25–0.34), and wound classification (dirty wounds: OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37–0.54).

Conclusions

In US academic medical centers, laparoscopy significantly reduces SSI. Patients treated with laparoscopic procedures are less likely to experience SSI. After stratification by severity of illness, admission status, and wound classification, laparoscopic techniques showed a protective effect against SSI.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Open surgery Postoperative wound infection Surgical-site infection 

References

  1. 1.
    Martone WJ, Gaynes RP, Horan TC, Danzig L, Emori TG, Monnet D, Stroud LA, Wright GC, Culver DH, Banerjee SN (1995) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) semiannual report, 1995: a report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. Am J Infect Control 236:377–385Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical-site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 20:271–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Emori TG, Gaynes RP (1993) An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 6:428–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sørensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV (1994) Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections: a case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect 113:283–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ (1999) The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:725–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herwaldt LA, Cullen JJ, Scholz D, French P, Zimmerman MB, Pfaller MA, Wenzel RP, Perl TM (2006) A prospective study of outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with postoperative nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:1291–1298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romy S, Eisenring MC, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical-site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247:627–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R (2003) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg 138:1179–1186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith RL, Bohl JK, McElearney ST, Friel CM, Barclay MM, Sawyer RG, Foley EF (2004) Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 239:599–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varela JE, Asolati M, Huerta S, Anthony T (2008) Outcomes of laparoscopy and open colectomy at academic centers. Am J Surg 196:403–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Varela JE, Hiyashi M, Nguyen T, Sabio A, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Am J Surg 192:837–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Varela JE, Hinojosa MW, Nguyen NT (2008) Laparoscopy should be the approach of choice for acute appendicitis in the morbidly obese. Am J Surg 196:218–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nguyen NT, Hinojosa M, Fayad C, Varela E, Wilson SE (2007) Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg 205:248–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ann Surg 237:358–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5:89–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Goldman C, Fleming N, Arango A, McFall R, Wolfe BM (2001) Comparison of pulmonary function and postoperative pain after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 192:469–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Anderson JT, Palmer LS, Canet F, Wolfe BM (2001) Evaluation of intraabdominal pressure after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. Obes Surg 11:40–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nguyen NT, Goldman CD, Ho HS, Gosselin RC, Singh A, Wolfe BM (2002) Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg 194:557–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wichmann MW, Hüttl TP, Winter H, Spelsberg F, Angele MK, Heiss MM, Jauch KW (2005) Immunological effects of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg 140:692–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD, Donahue J, Fowler R, Munger C, Doorman J, Balli JE, Glass J, Gonzalez JJ, Bessler M, Xie H, Treat M (2003) Postoperative cell-mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 17:972–978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Esteban Varela
    • 1
  • Samuel E. Wilson
    • 2
  • Ninh T. Nguyen
    • 2
  1. 1.Minimally Invasive SurgeryVeteran Affairs North Texas Healthcare SystemDallasUSA
  2. 2.University of California, Irvine Medical CenterIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations