Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, 23:2657 | Cite as

Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial

  • Ömer BenderEmail author
  • Fatih Levent Balcı
  • Enis Yüney
  • Fazıl Sağlam
  • Yaşar Özdenkaya
  • Yavuz Selim Sarı
Article

Abstract

Background

Kugel repair, a minimally invasive technique, has become an alternative to laparoscopic groin hernia repair, but the technique has not been adequately evaluated by assessment of objective parameters. A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out to compare the systemic inflammatory response to surgical trauma and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent groin hernia repair by the Kugel and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic methods.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients admitted for unilateral groin hernia were randomized to Kugel (n = 20) or TEP (n = 20) repair under general anesthesia. Operation time, length of hospital stay, pain severity, time to return to normal activities, cost, and systemic inflammatory and hormone responses to surgical trauma were compared.

Results

There were no significant between-group differences in duration of operation, length of hospital stay, time to return to normal activities, or mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score (p > 0.05 for each). Serum cortisol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations before surgery, and 1 and 24 h after surgery, did not differ significantly in the two groups (p > 0.05). There were no recurrences or complications during follow-up. Cost per patient was US $546 lower in the Kugel group.

Conclusion

Kugel herniorrhaphy is a minimally invasive technique that offers all the advantages of TEP and is more cost-effective.

Keywords

Groin hernia Systemic inflammatory response Kugel Laparoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Sylla P, Kirman I, Whelan RL (2005) Immunological advantages of advanced laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 85(1):1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B et al (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH et al (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169(2):208–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA et al (1998) A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187(1):46–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hallen M, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2008) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 143(3):313–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andersson B, Hallen M, Leveau P et al (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133(5):464–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dogru O, Girgin M, Bulbuller N et al (2006) Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: Results of a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 30(3):346–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, et al (2003) EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kugel RD (1999) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178(4):298–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kugel RD (2003) The Kugel repair for groin hernias. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1119–1139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwab R, Eissele S, Brückner UB et al (2004) Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) versus Shouldice groin hernia repair. Hernia 8(3):226–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiu SK, Collier CP, Clark AF et al (2003) Salivary cortisol on Roche Elecsys immunoassay system: pilot biological variations studies. Clin Biochem 36:211–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caldas JP, Marba ST, Blotta MH et al (2008) Accuracy of white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha for diagnosing late neonatal sepsis. J Pediatr (Rio J) 84(6):536–542Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tornblom SA, Klimavicuite A, Bystrom B et al (2005) Non-infected preterm parturition is related to increased concentrations of IL-6, IL-8 and MCP-1 in human cervix. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 25(3):39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahr HB, Bendix J, Ahlburg P (2006) Coagulation, inflammatory, and stress responses in a randomized comparison of open and laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 20(3):468–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Keemers-Gels M et al (2007) Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J Surg 31(9):1751–1757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE et al (2004) Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg 70(2):132–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ceriani V, Faleschini E, Bignami P et al (2005) Kugel hernia repair: open “mini-invasive” technique. Personal experience on 620 patients. Hernia 9(4):344–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fenoglio ME, Bermas HR, Haun WE et al (2005) Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach. Hernia 9(2):160–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Misawa T, Sakurai M, Kanai H et al (2005) Kugel herniorrhaphy: clinical results of 124 consecutive operations. Surg Today 35(8):639–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (1998) A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 12(10):1199–1203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Heikkinen T, Haukipuro K, Leppala J et al (1997) Total costs of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs: a randomized prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7(1):1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Payne JH Jr, Grininger LM, Izawa MT et al (1994) Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. Arch Surg 129(9):973–979PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ömer Bender
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fatih Levent Balcı
    • 1
  • Enis Yüney
    • 1
  • Fazıl Sağlam
    • 1
  • Yaşar Özdenkaya
    • 1
  • Yavuz Selim Sarı
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryS. B. Okmeydaný Training and Research HospitalİstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations