Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 8, pp 1894–1899 | Cite as

Novel magnetically guided intra-abdominal camera to facilitate laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial human experience

  • Jeffrey Cadeddu
  • Raul Fernandez
  • Mihir Desai
  • Richard Bergs
  • Chad Tracy
  • Shou-Jiang Tang
  • Prashanth Rao
  • Mahesh Desai
  • Daniel Scott
Article

Abstract

Background

Magnetic anchoring guidance systems (MAGS) are composed of an internal surgical instrument controlled by an external handheld magnet and do not require a dedicated surgical port. Therefore, this system may help to reduce internal and external collision of instruments associated with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. Herein, we describe the initial clinical experience with a magnetically anchored camera system used during laparoscopic nephrectomy and appendectomy in two human patients.

Methods

Two separate cases were performed using a single-incision working port with the addition of a magnetically anchored camera that was controlled externally with a magnet.

Results

Surgery was successful in both cases. Nephrectomy was completed in 120 min with 150 ml estimated blood loss (EBL) and the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 2. Appendectomy was successfully completed in 55 min with EBL of 10 ml and the patient was discharged home the following morning.

Conclusions

Use of a MAGS camera results in fewer instrument collisions, improves surgical working space, and provides an image comparable to that in standard laparoscopy.

Keywords

Appendix Urology Technical < Endoscopy Renal (kidneys) Instruments < Technical Imaging & VR < Technical 

References

  1. 1.
    Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A et al (2007) Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 70(6):1039–1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rane A, Rao P, Bonadio F, Rao P (2007) Single port laparoscopic nephrectomy using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port) and evolution of single laparoscopic port procedure (SLIPP). J Endourol 21(1):A287Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ponsky LE, Cherullo EE, Sawyer M, Hartke D (2008) Single access site laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: initial clinical experience. J Endourol 22:663–666Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M et al (2008) Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101(1):83–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goel RK, Kaouk JH (2008) Single port access renal cryoablation (SPARC): a new approach. Eur Urol 53:1204–1209Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK et al (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 71(1):3–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaouk JH, Palmer JS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: initial experience in children for varicocelectomy. BJU Int 102:97–99Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rane A (2008) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading? Nat Clin Pract Urol 5(10):561–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park S, Bergs RA, Eberhart R et al (2007) Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg 245(3):379–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zeltser IS, Cadeddu JA (2008) A novel magnetic anchoring and guidance system to facilitate single trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy. Curr Urol Rep 9(1):62–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeltser IS, Bergs R, Fernandez R et al (2007) Single trocar laparoscopic nephrectomy using magnetic anchoring and guidance system in the porcine model. J Urol 178(1):288–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R et al (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21(12):2308–2316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gettman MT, Cadeddu JA (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in urology: initial experience. J Endourol 22(4):783–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raman JD, Scott DJ, Cadeddu JA (2008) Role of magnetic anchors during single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and NOTES. J Endourol (in print)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rao P, Rane A (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. BJU Int 101:1493–1496Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagh MS, Thompson CC (2007) Surgery insight: natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery—an analysis of work to date. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(7):386–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Esposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12(2):177–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(4):361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martínez AP, Bermejo MA, Cortś JC, Orayen CG, Chacón JP, Bravo LB (2007) Appendectomy with a single trocar through the umbilicus: results of our series and a cost approximation. Cir Pediatr 20(1):10–14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, Cherullo E, Clayman R, Desai M, Frank I, Gettman M, Gill I, Gupta M, Haber G-P, Kaouk J, Landman J, Lima E, Ponsky L, Rane A, Sawyer M, Humphreys M (2008) Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES™) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J Endourol 22(11):2575–2582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raman JD, Bergs RA, Fernandez R, Bagrodia A, Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA (2009) Complete transvaginal NOTES nephrectomy using magnetically anchored instrumentation. J Endoural 23(3):367–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA (2008) Single-Incision, Umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Cadeddu
    • 1
  • Raul Fernandez
    • 2
  • Mihir Desai
    • 3
  • Richard Bergs
    • 2
  • Chad Tracy
    • 2
  • Shou-Jiang Tang
    • 4
  • Prashanth Rao
    • 5
  • Mahesh Desai
    • 6
  • Daniel Scott
    • 7
  1. 1.UrologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA
  2. 2.Texas Manufacturing Assistance Center, Automation and Robotics Research InstituteUniversity of TexasFortworthUSA
  3. 3.UrologyCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  4. 4.Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of MedicineUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA
  5. 5.Mamta HospitalMumbaiIndia
  6. 6.Muljibhai Patel Urological HospitalNadiadIndia
  7. 7.Southwestern Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CentreDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations