Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1428–1432 | Cite as

Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: a systematic literature review

  • João Luiz Moreira Coutinho AzevedoEmail author
  • Otavio Cansanção Azevedo
  • Susana Abe Miyahira
  • Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel
  • Otávio Monteiro BeckerJr.
  • Octávio Henrique Mendes Hypólito
  • Afonso Cesar Cabral Guedes Machado
  • Wellington Cardia
  • Gilmara Aguiar Yamaguchi
  • Lola Godinho
  • Dalmer Freire
  • Carlos Eduardo Saldanha Almeida
  • Camila Hobi Moreira
  • Dalmer Faria Freire
Review

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risks, and outcomes of injuries caused by the Veress needle described in the literature.

Methods

Iatrogenic injuries caused by Veress needle insertion during diagnostic or therapeutic laparoscopies in humans were researched, with no language restriction, in the Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Scielo, and Cochrane Library databases. The following words were combined: “Veress” or “insufflation needle” or “pneumoperitoneum needle,” and “complications” or “injuries” or “lesions.” The bibliographic references of the selected articles were also analyzed. We considered the following: (1) number of injuries described in the literature, (2) relationship between number of injuries and number of patients who underwent Veress needle insertion in the studies that reported Veress needle injury, (3) organs and structures injured (retroperitoneal vessels, digestive tract, and self-limited, minor injuries), and (4) outcome (death, conversion to laparotomy, laparoscopic repair, spontaneous resolution).

Results

Thirty-eight selected articles included 696,502 laparoscopies, with 1,575 injuries (0.23%), 126 (8%) of which involved blood vessels or hollow viscera (0.018% of all laparoscopies). Of the 98 vascular injuries, 8 (8.1%) were injuries to major retroperitoneal vessels. There were 34 other reported retroperitoneal injuries, but the authors were not specific as to which vessel was injured. Of the 28 injuries to hollow viscera, 17 were considered major injuries, i.e., 60.7% (0.0024% of the total cases assessed).

Conclusion

The insertion of the Veress needle in the abdominal midline, at the umbilicus, poses serious risk to the life of patients. Therefore, further studies should be conducted to investigate alternative sites for Veress needle insertion.

Keywords

Surgery Complications Pneumoperitoneum Veress needle Puncture Adverse effects Laparoscopy Minimally invasive surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Muhe E (1986) Die erste Cholecystektomie durch das Laparoskop. Langenbecks Arch Chir 369:804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yuzpe AA (1990) Pneumoperitoneum needle and trocar injuries in laparoscopy: a survey on possible contributing factors and prevention. J Reprod Med 35:485–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mouret Ph (1996) Cirurgia laparoscópica: una evolución de la filosofia quirúrgica? In: Mineiro M, Melotti G, Mouret Ph (eds) Cirurgia laparoscópica. Panamericana, Madrid, p 112Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, TrimbosKemper T, Herman SJ, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre and observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:595–600PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:246–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer H, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi Ch, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Veress J (1938) Neues Instument zur Asfuhrung von Brustoder Bauchpunktionen and Pneumothoraxbehandlung. Dtsch Med Wochenshr 41:1480–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Périssat J, Vitale GC (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: gateway to the future. Am J Surg 161:408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasson HM (1971) A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110:886–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Olsen DO (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:339–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, Querleu D, Lansac J, Dubuisson JB (1997) Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 185(5):461–465 comment 186(5):604–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum: a multicenter study on 12, 919 cases. Surg Endosc 15:566–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta FP, Micali B (1998) Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(5):353–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 15:275–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harkki-Siren P (1999) The incidence of entry-related laparoscopic injuries in Finland. Gynaecol Endosc 8:335–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon GL, Gorbach SL (1982) Intestinal microflora. Med Clin North Am 66:557–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borriello SP (1989) Microbial flora of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Microbial metabolism in the digestive tract. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 219Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rohatgi A, Widdison AL (2004) Subcostal (Veress needle) approach is a safe method for creating a pneumoperitoneum. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14:278–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaloo P, Cooper M, Molloy D (2002) A survey of entry techniques and complications of members of the Australian Gynaecological Endoscopy Society. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42(3):264–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang FH, Lee CL, Soong YK (1994) Use of Palmer’s point for insertion of the operative laparoscope in patients with severe pelvic adhesions: experience of seventeen cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1(4, Part 2):S7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leonard F, Lecuru F, Rizk E, Chasset S, Robin F, Taurelle R (2000) Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy: a prospective monocenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:129–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guloglu R, Dilege S, Aksoy M, Alimoglu O, Yavuz N, Mihmanli M, Gulmen M (2004) Major retroperitoneal vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:73–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Battaglia L, Bartolucci R, Berni A, Leo E, De Antoni E (2003) Major vessel injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report. Chir Ital 55:291–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benítez Pacheco OR, Serra E, Jara L, Buzzi JC (2003) Heart arrest caused by CO2 embolism during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 50:295–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Friedman JD, Ramsey PS, Ramin KD, Berry C (2002) Pneumoamnion and pregnancy loss after second-trimester laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 99:512–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Orlando R, Lirussi F (2001) Bladder injury during diagnostic laparoscopy. A case report. Surg Endosc 15:760Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dixon M, Carrillo EH (1999) Iliac vascular injuries during elective laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:1230–1233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, Querleu D, Lansac J, Dubuisson JB (1997) Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 185:461–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fruhwirth J, Koch G, Mischinger HJ, Werkgartner G, Tesch NP (1997) Vascular complications in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:251–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Geers J, Holden C (1996) Major vascular injury as a complication of laparoscopic surgery: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Am Surg 62:377–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hanney RM, Alle KM, Cregan PC (1995) Major vascular injury and laparoscopy. Aust N Z Surg 65:533–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baadsgaard SE, Bille S, Egeblad K (1989) Major vascular injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Report of a case and review of published cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68:283–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peterson HB, Greenspan JR, Ory HW (1982) Death following puncture of the aorta during laparoscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 59:133–134PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Otavio Cansanção Azevedo
    • 1
  • Susana Abe Miyahira
    • 1
  • Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel
    • 1
  • Otávio Monteiro BeckerJr.
    • 1
  • Octávio Henrique Mendes Hypólito
    • 1
  • Afonso Cesar Cabral Guedes Machado
    • 1
  • Wellington Cardia
    • 1
  • Gilmara Aguiar Yamaguchi
    • 1
  • Lola Godinho
    • 1
  • Dalmer Freire
    • 1
  • Carlos Eduardo Saldanha Almeida
    • 1
  • Camila Hobi Moreira
    • 1
  • Dalmer Faria Freire
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Operative Techniques and Experimental Surgery, Department of SurgeryFederal University of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations