Surgical Endoscopy

, 23:2374 | Cite as

Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

  • Osamu Ikeda
  • Yoshihisa Sakaguchi
  • Yoshiro Aoki
  • Norifumi Harimoto
  • Jyunya Taomoto
  • Takaaki Masuda
  • Takefumi Ohga
  • Eisuke Adachi
  • Yasushi Toh
  • Takeshi Okamura
  • Hideo Baba
Article

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has become common due to improvement of the surgical techniques and devices for laparoscopic surgery. Although laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has several advantages over open distal gastrectomy, little has been reported about the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG).

Methods

Between October 2005 and June 2007, 80 laparoscopic distal gastrectomies with regional lymphadenectomies were performed for patients with gastric cancer. After 24 patients underwent LADG and 56 patients underwent TLDG, the clinical data were compared between the two groups.

Results

The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histologic type, lymph node metastasis, and length of proximal margin. However, when only the patients with gastric cancer in the middle third of the stomach were compared between the two groups, the length of the proximal margin was significantly longer in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The mean blood loss was significantly less in the TLDG group (p < 0.05). The patients in the TLDG group recovered earlier and thus had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay. Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 7 was lower in the TLDG group than in the LADG group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that TLDG has several advantages over LADG including smaller wounds, less invasiveness, and better feasibility of a secure ablation. The TLDG procedure yields safe anastomosis independently of the patient’s constitution or the location of the cancer. Therefore, TLDG is considered to be a useful technique for patients with gastric cancer.

Keywords

Intracorporeal anastomosis Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy Minimally invasive surgery Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (2006) Eighth nationwide survey of endoscopic surgery in Japan (in Japanese). J Jpn Soc Surg 11:527–628Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2000) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg 135:806–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y (2002) A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs. laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 131:S306–S311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T, Wada Y, Ohtoshi M (2002) Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg 195:284–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Takaori K, Nomura E, Mabuchi H, Lee SW, Agui T, Miyamoto Y, Iwamoto M, Watanabe H, Tanigawa N (2005) A secure technique of intracorporeal Roux-y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Am J Surg 189:178–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagai Y, Tanimura H, Takifuji K, Kashiwagi H, Yamoto H, Nakatani Y (1995) Laparoscope-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:281–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uyama I, Sugioka A, Fujita J, Komori Y, Matsui H, Soga R, Wakayama A, Okamoto K, Ohyama A, Hasumi A (1999) Completely laparoscopic extraperigastric lymph node dissection for gastric malignancies located in the middle or lower third of the stomach. Gastric Cancer 2:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, Ponzano C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241:232–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yano H, Monden T, Kinuta M, Nakano Y, Tono T, Matsui S, Iwazawa T, Kanoh T, Katsushima S (2001) The usefulness of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in comparison with that of open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 4:93–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mochiki E, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H (2005) Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: five years’ experience. Surgery 137:317–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanimura S, Higashino M, Fukunaga Y, Kishida S, Ogata A, Fujiwara Y, Osugi H (2006) Respiratory function after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: an index of minimally invasive surgery. World J Surg 30:1211–1215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Osamu Ikeda
    • 1
  • Yoshihisa Sakaguchi
    • 1
  • Yoshiro Aoki
    • 1
  • Norifumi Harimoto
    • 1
  • Jyunya Taomoto
    • 1
  • Takaaki Masuda
    • 1
  • Takefumi Ohga
    • 1
  • Eisuke Adachi
    • 1
  • Yasushi Toh
    • 1
  • Takeshi Okamura
    • 1
  • Hideo Baba
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNational Kyushu Cancer CenterMinami-ku, FukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamoto CityJapan

Personalised recommendations