The modern treatment of early gastric cancer: our experience in an Italian cohort
- 201 Downloads
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) by Japanese authors. However, there are no reports about its possible implementation in the Western setting. The aim of the present work is to determine the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic treatments for EGC in an Italian cohort.
Forty-five patients for a total of 48 gastric lesions were enrolled in the study. Thirty-six EMR procedures were performed with the strip biopsy technique using a double-channel endoscope. En bloc resection refers to resection in one piece, while piecemeal refers to resections in which the lesion was removed in multiple fragments. A total of 12 ESD were performed and completed with IT knife. We define as curative treatment lateral and vertical margins of the resected specimens free of cancer and repeat endoscopic finding of no recurrent disease.
Out of 36 EMR procedures, 10 were piecemeal resections (28%), while 26 were en bloc (72%). ESD led to en bloc resection in 11/12 cases (92%). Histological assessment of curability in the EMR group was achieved in 56% of the cases, and in 92% of the ESD group. Mean follow-up period was 31 months (range: 12–71 months). There was no local recurrence or distant metastasis in the curative group patients.
These results seem to confirm the safety and the clinical efficacy of the ESD procedure in the Western world too.
KeywordsEarly gastric cancer Endoscopic mucosal resection Endoscopic submucosal dissection Endoscopic resection
- 6.Suzuki H (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection using ligating device for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 11:511–518Google Scholar
- 7.Soetikno RM, Gotoda T, Fujii T, Axon T (2003) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 57:567–579Google Scholar
- 10.Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1999) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Kanehara, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- 13.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2004) Gastric cancer treatment guideline, 2nd edn. Kanehara-Shuppan, Tokyo in JapaneseGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fujii K, Okajima K, Isozaki H, Hara H, Nomura E, Sako S et al (1998) A clinicopathological study on the indications of limited surgery for submucosal gastric cancer. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 31:2055–2062Google Scholar
- 23.Watanabe K, Ogata S, Kawazoe S, Watanabe K, Koyama T, Kajiwara T, Shimoda Y, Takase Y, Irie K, Mizuguchi M, Tsunada S, Iwakiri R, Fujimoto K (2006) Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors: historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 63:776–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y, Boku N, Ohtsu A, Baba S, Yoshida M, Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Tajiri H, Yoshida S (2002) A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 55:576–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Shimizu Y, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2006) Successful nonsurgical management of perforation complicating endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy 38:1001–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Folli S, Morgagni P, Roviello F, de Manzoni G, Marelli D, Saragoni L, Di Leo A, Gaudio M, Nanni A, Carli A, Cordiano C, Dell’Amore D, Vio A (2001) Risk factors for lymph node metastasis and their prognostic significance in early gastric cancer (EGC) for the Italian Research Group for gastric cancer (IRGGC). Jpn J Clin Oncol 10:495–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Di Leo A, Marrelli D, Roviello F, Bernini M, Minicozzi A, Giacopuzzi S, Pedrazzani C, Baiocchi LG, de Manzoni G (2007) Lymph node involvement in gastric cancer for different tumor sites and T stage: Italian Research Group for gastric cancer (IRGGC) experience. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1146–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar