Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 2034–2040 | Cite as

Resumption of daily physical activity after day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Daria K. Wasowicz-Kemps
  • Sander M. Slootmaker
  • Hareld M. C. Kemps
  • Inne H. M. Borel-Rinkes
  • Douwe H. Biesma
  • Bert van Ramshorst



Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been proven to be safe and feasible as a day-case procedure. Few studies investigated postoperative activity resumption. The goal of this study was to objectively assess daily physical activity after day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy and evaluate the effect of encouragement of patients.


This prospective controlled study measured daily physical activity in an unselected patient population undergoing day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using an accelerometer for 1 week before surgery to 1 week after. First, a control group received standard care. Subsequently, an intervention group was encouraged to swift resumption of daily physical activity by means of standardized advice combined with individualized activity goals. Outcome measures were activity scores, visual analogue scores (VAS) for pain and nausea and subjective factors limiting activity.


Sixty-four patients completed the study (n = 28 in the control group, n = 36 in the intervention group). In the control group, 36% of the patients reached their preoperative activity level after 1 week, as compared to 50% in the intervention group (p = 0.19). Resumption of daily physical activity during the first postoperative week in the intervention group was not significantly different from the control group [repeated measures analysis of variance (MANOVA), p = 0.05]. However, in contrast with men, women in the intervention group did show a faster recovery of daily physical activity as compared to the control group (MANOVA, p = 0.02). Although there was no significant difference in postoperative VAS scores for pain and nausea between both groups, patients in the intervention group experienced pain less often as a limiting factor (p = 0.006).


Recovery of daily physical activity exceeded 1 week in most patients undergoing day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The use of an accelerometer and standardized encouragement accelerated recovery in women.


Day surgery Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Daily physical activity Accelerometer 


  1. 1.
    Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L (2006) Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:40–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leeder PC, Matthews T, Krzeminska K, Dehn TC (2004) Routine day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 91:312–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E, Bovbjerg VE, Markey DW, Blome S, Minasi JS, Hanks JB, Moore MM, Young JS, Jones RS, Schirmer BD, Adams RB (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233:704–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson WS, Fuhrman GS, Burch E, Bolton JS, Bowen JC (2001) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Outcomes of 847 planned procedures. Surg Endosc 15:193–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleisher LA, Yee K, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Heath R, Bass E, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost-effective? A model to study transition of care. Anesthesiology 90:1746–1755 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zegarra RF 2nd, Saba AK, Peschiera JL (1997) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective? Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:487–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Narain PK, DeMaria EJ (1997) Initial results of a prospective trial of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11:1091–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam D, Miranda R, Hom SJ (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an outpatient procedure. J Am Coll Surg 185:152–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mjaland O, Raeder J, Aasboe V, Trondsen E, Buanes T (1997) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:958–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H (2001) Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 136:917–921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2001) Pain and convalescence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 167:84–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oikkonen M, Purola-Lofstedt M, Makinen MT, Aromaa U (2001) Convalescence in the first week after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results from a detailed questionnaire on morbidity and recovery of daily activities. Surg Endosc 15:94–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McLauchlan GJ, Macintyre IM (1995) Return to work after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82:239–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D (1994) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81:1362–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2002) Recovery after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 132:817–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Redeker NS, Mason DJ, Wykpisz E, Glica B, Miner C (1994) First postoperative week activity patterns and recovery in women after coronary artery bypass surgery. Nurs Res 43:168–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wijsmuller AR, Leegwater M, Tseng L, Smaal HJ, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF (2007) Optimizing the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by clipping and transecting the cystic artery before the cystic duct. Br J Surg 94:473–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slootmaker SM, Chin A, Paw MJM, Schuit AJ, van Mechelen W, Koppes LLJ (accepted) Concurrent validity of the PAM accelerometer relative to the MTI Actigraph using oxygen consumption as a reference. Scand J Med Sci SportsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daria K. Wasowicz-Kemps
    • 1
  • Sander M. Slootmaker
    • 2
  • Hareld M. C. Kemps
    • 3
  • Inne H. M. Borel-Rinkes
    • 4
  • Douwe H. Biesma
    • 5
  • Bert van Ramshorst
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySt Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Department of Occupational and Public HealthTNO-VU University Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Sports MedicineMáxima Medical CentreVeldhovenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Internal MedicineSt Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations