Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 577–582 | Cite as

Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life, body image, cosmesis, and functional results

  • Marco Scarpa
  • Francesca Erroi
  • Cesare Ruffolo
  • Eleonora Mollica
  • Lino Polese
  • Giulia Pozza
  • Lorenzo Norberto
  • Davide F. D’Amico
  • Imerio Angriman
Article

Abstract

Background

The aims of this cross-sectional study were to assess the long-term quality of life, the body image, and the cosmetic and functional results in patients who had laparoscopic-assisted for colorectal cancer.

Methods

Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study: 21 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection and 21 patients who had open colonic resection, selected according to stage, gender, age, cancer site, and type of resection. The patients answered four questionnaires about their quality of life, body image, functional, and cosmetic results. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients who had laparoscopic-assisted resection. The cosmetic score was significantly better in the laparoscopic-assisted group than in the open group (p < 0.01). In spite of similar overall body image score, patients who had a laparoscopic-assisted resection reported a significantly better satisfaction with their own body (p = 0.05). Quality-of-life and functional results were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

The cosmetic results and the consequent satisfaction with the body were significantly better after laparoscopic assisted resection compared to equivalent open procedure. These effects seemed to be temporary but they could help patients to accept the burden of surgery.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Laparoscopic-assisted colonic resection Quality of life Body image 

References

  1. 1.
    Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF et al (2003) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1276–1299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T et al (2001) Cancer statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 51:15–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker N, Muscat JE, Wynder EL (2001) Cancer mortality in the United States and Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 127:293–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jehle EC, Haehnel T, Starlinger MJ et al (1995) Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 169:147–152; discussion 152–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pahlman L (2001) The rectal cancer debate. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korolija D, Wood-Dauphinee S, Pointner R (2007) Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they? Surg Endosc 21(4):503–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sideris L, Zenasni F, Vernerey D, Dauchy S, Lasser P, Pignon JP, Elias D, Di Palma M, Pocard M (2005) Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2180–2219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McLeod RS (2001) Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 233:157–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cera SM, Wexner SD (2005) Minimally invasive treatment of colon cancer. Cancer J 11(1):26–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hopwood P (1993) The assessment of body image in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 29A:276–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lasry JCM, Margolese RG, Poisson R, Shibata H, Pilch Y, Lerner H, Fisher B (1987) Depression and body image following mastectomy and lumpectomy. J Chron Dis 40:529–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sprangers MAG, Groenvold M, Arraras JI, Franklin J, Te Velde A, Muller M, Franzini L (1996) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Breast cancer–specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: first results from a three country field study. J Clin Oncol 14:2756–2768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12:1334–1340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greene Fl, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Young-Fadok TM, Nelson H (2000) Laparoscopic right colectomy: five step procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 43:267–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, Polese L, Martin A, D’Incà R, Sturniolo GC, D’Amico DF, Angriman I (2007) Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: different questionnaires lead to different interpretations. Arch Surg 142(2):158–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wong WD, Congliosi SM, Spencer MP et al (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: result from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1139–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Urso E, Serpentini S, Pucciarelli S, De Salvo GL, Friso ML, Fabris G, Lonardi S, Ferraro B, Bruttocao A, Aschele C, Nitti D (2006) Complications, functional outcome and quality of life after intensive preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 32(10):1201–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    American Society of Colon and Rectum Surgeons (1994) Approved statement on laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:8–12Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McLeod RS (1999) Quality of life measurement in the assessment of surgical outcome. Adv Surg 33:293–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 16;287(3):321–328Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E; European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18(6):879–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ (2001) Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 44(12):1800–1807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Piotrowicz K, Cima RR, Wolff BG, Young-Fadok TM (2005) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: functional outcome in a case-matched series. Dis Colon Rectum 48(10):1845–1850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scarpa M, Ruffolo C, D’Incà R, Filosa T, Bertin E, Ferraro S, Polese L, Martin A, Sturniolo GC, Frego M, D’Amico DF, Angriman I (2007) Health related quality of life after ileo-colonic resection for Crohn’s disease: long-term results. Inflam Bowel Dis 13(4):462–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scarpa M, Angriman I, Ruffolo C, Ferronato A, Polese L, Barollo M, Martin A, Sturniolo GC, D’Amico DF (2004) Health-related quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: long-term results. World J Surg 28(2):124–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Scarpa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesca Erroi
    • 1
  • Cesare Ruffolo
    • 1
  • Eleonora Mollica
    • 1
  • Lino Polese
    • 1
  • Giulia Pozza
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Norberto
    • 1
  • Davide F. D’Amico
    • 1
  • Imerio Angriman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, sez. di Clinica Chirurgica IUniversity of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Clinica Chirurgica IPoliclinico Universitario, Universitá di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations