Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 1763–1768 | Cite as

Fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux and factors associated with the outcome 6 to 10 years after the operation: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors using the propensity score

  • J. HafezEmail author
  • F. Wrba
  • J. Lenglinger
  • J. Miholic
Article

Abstract

Background

The impact from the mode of operation (partial vs total fundoplication) on long-term outcome after fundoplication still is unknown, although short-term randomized studies have not shown significant differences in the efficacy of reflux control. To obtain some insight concerning the long-term results, the data of a nonrandomized cohort were analyzed using propensity score statistics.

Methods

For 134 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the time until recurrence of reflux symptoms was assessed. The impact of putative prognostic factors and the mode of operation (partial vs total fundoplication) on outcome were tested for significance using univariate and multivariate statistics, including the propensity score, correcting for nonrandomized treatment groups. The follow-up period was 60 to 123 months (median, 93 months). In this study, 45 patients had a partial (Toupet) fundoplication, and 89 patients underwent a total (Nissen) fundoplication.

Results

The rate of recurrence after 93 months (the median follow-up interval) was 14% after Nissen and 9% after Toupet fundoplication (nonsignificant difference) as estimated according to Kaplan and Meier. Massive acid exposure to the esophagus was associated with an increased risk of recurrence for 23% of the patients with a DeMeester score of 50 or higher, but only for 9% of the patients with less severe reflux (DeMeester score <50; p < 0.05). Multiple proportional hazard regression using the propensity score did not show additional significance for the variables of age, gender, presence of a Barrett esophagus, and mode of operation.

Conclusion

The operation method did not have a significant impact on the efficacy of laparoscopic fundoplication in a cohort during a follow-up period of 60 to 123 months (median, 93 months).

Keywords

GERD Gastroesophageal reflux disease Reflux Fundoplication Prognostic factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Bais JE, Bartelsman JF, Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA, Go PM, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, van Lanschot JJ, Nadorp JH, Smout AJ, van der Graaf Y, Gooszen HG (2000) Laparoscopic or conventional Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomised clinical trial. The Netherlands Antireflux Surgery Study Group. Lancet 355:170–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blackstone EH (2002) Compsaring apples and oranges. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 12:8–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Zoras OJ, Athanasakis E, Mantides A, Katsamouris A, Xynos E (2003) Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: total or partial fundoplication? J Am Coll Surg 197:8–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csendes A, Braghetto I, Burdiles P, Puente G, Korn O, Diaz JC, Maluenda F (1998) Long-term results of classic antireflux surgery in 152 patients with Barrett’s esophagus: clinical, radiologic, endoscopic, manometric, and acid reflux test analysis before and late after operation. Surgery 123:645–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dallemagne B, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Dwandre JM, Wahlen C, Monami B, Jehaes C (2006) Clinical results of laparoscopic fundoplication at ten years after surgery. Surg Endoscop 20:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dan S, Brigand C, Pierrard F, Rohr S, Meyer C (2005) The outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: long-term results. Ann Chir 130:477–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeMeester TR, Johnson LF, Kent AH (1974) Evaluation of current operations for the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Ann Surg 180:511–519PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donald BR (1997) Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 127:757–763Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Draaisma WA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Broeders IA, Smout AJ, Furnee EJ, Gooszen HG (2006) Five-year subjective and objective results of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 244:34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Farrell TM, Archer SB, Galloway KD, Branum GD, Smith CD, Hunter JG (2000) Heartburn is more likely to recur after Toupet fundoplication than Nissen fundoplication. Am Surg 66:229–236, discussion 236–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fass R, Hell RW, Garewal HS, Martinez P, Pulliam G, Wendel C, Sampliner RE (2001) Correlation of oesophageal acid exposure with Barrett’s oesophagus length. Gut 48:310–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fibbe C, Layer P, Keller J, Strate U, Emmermann A, Zornig C (2001) Esophageal motility in reflux disease before and after fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, clinical, and manometric study. Gastroenterology 121:5–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hagedorn C, Lönroth H, Rydberg L, Ruth M, Lundell L (2002) Long-term efficacy of total (Nissen-Rossetti) and posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Gastrointest Surg 6:540–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, Neary P, DeMeester TR, Perdikis G (1994) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 220:472–481, discussion 481–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horvath KD, Jobe BA, Herron DM, Swanstrom LL (1999) Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is an inadequate procedure for patients with severe reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 3:583–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Horvath KD, Swanstrom LL, Jobe BA (2000) The short esophagus: pathophysiology, incidence, presentation, and treatment in the era of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 232:630–640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jobe BA, Wallace J, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (1997) Evaluation of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication as a primary repair for all patients with medically resistant gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Endosc 11:1080–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR (1999) Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 4:327–331Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic vs conventional Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 11:441–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laws HL, Clements RH, Swillie CM (1997) A randomized, prospective comparison of the Nissen fundoplication versus the Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 225:647–653, discussion 654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, Tytgat GN, Wallin L (1999) Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 45:172–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nilsson G, Wenner J, Larsson S, Johnsson F (2004) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 91:552–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oberg S, DeMeester TR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Nigro JJ, DeMeester SR, Theisen J, Campos GM, Crookes PF (1999) The extent of Barrett’s esophagus depends on the status of the lower esophageal sphincter and the degree of esophageal acid exposure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:572–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Reilly MJ, Mullins SG, Saye WB, Pinto SE, Falkner PT (1996) Laparoscopic posterior partial fundoplication: analysis of 100 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 6:141–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ottignon Y, Pelissier EP, Mantion G, Clement C, Birgen C, Deschamps JP, Carayon P, Gillet M (1994) Gastroesophageal reflux: comparison of clinical, pH-metric, and manometric results of Nissen’s and of Toupet’s procedures. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 18:920–926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Puhalla H, Lenglinger J, Bischof G, Miholic J, Fugger R, Stacher G (2002) Nissen and Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux and motility disorders of the distal esophagus. Chirurg 73:230–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rydberg L, Ruth M, Abrahamsson H, Lundell L (1999) Tailoring antireflux surgery: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 23:612–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D, Bergman JJ, Gossner L, Hoshihara Y, Jankowski JA, Junghard O, Lundell L, Tytgat GN, Vieth M (2006) The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria. Gastroenterology 131:1392–1399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stacher G, Lenglinger J, Eisler M, Hoffmann M, Goll A, Bergmann H, Stacher-Janotta G (2006) Esophageal acid exposure in upright and recumbent postures: roles of lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal contractile and transport function, hiatal hernia, age, sex, and body mass. Dig Dis Sci 51:1896–1903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thor KB, Silander T (1989) A long-term randomized prospective trial of the Nissen procedure versus a modified Toupet technique. Ann Surg 210:719–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zornig C, Strate U, Fibbe C, Emmermann A, Layer P (2002) Nissen vs Toupet laparoscopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc 16:758–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMedical University ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of PathologyMedical University ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations