Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 2606–2608 | Cite as

Routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy: a useful maneuver?

  • Gregory Kennedy
  • David Larson
  • Bruce Wolff
  • Desmond Winter
  • Bret Petersen
  • Mark Larson
Article

Abstract

Background

The utility of routine ileoscopy as a component of screening colonoscopy is unclear. Many endoscopists believe that routine intubation of the terminal ileum is a requirement for a full-screening colonoscopy. The authors have hypothesized that routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy is of little diagnostic value.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using a prospectively maintained colonoscopy database of patients identified as undergoing a screening colonoscopy. All had undergone intubation of the terminal ileum at a tertiary referral center. Those who had undergone screening colonoscopy at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) were entered prospectively into a database. The study identified 6,408 patients who met the criteria of having terminal ileal intubation at the time of screening colonoscopy. The main outcome measured was abnormality of the terminal ileum at ileal intubation.

Results

Ileoscopy showed grossly abnormal findings for only 1% of the patients, and pathologic abnormalities were identified for only 0.3% of all the patients.

Conclusions

The findings support the conclusion that intubation of the terminal ileum should not be a required part of screening colonoscopy.

Keywords

General endoscopy GI endoscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis BS (2003) Ileoscopy should be part of standard colonoscopy: a comparison of radiographic and endoscopic evaluation of the ileum. J Clin Gastroenterol 31:103–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherian S, Singh P (2004) Is routine ileoscopy useful? An observational study of procedure times, diagnostic yield, and learning curve. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2324–2329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sultan S, Mitchell RM (2004) The importance of ileoscopy in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:359, author reply 359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoong KK, Heymann T (2006) It is not worthwhile to perform ileoscopy on all patients. Surg Endosc 20:809–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borsch G, Schmidt G (1985) Endoscopy of the terminal ileum: diagnostic yield in 400 consecutive examinations. Dis Colon Rectum 28:499–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kundrotas LW, Clement DJ, Kubik CM, Robinson AB, Wolfe PA (1994) A prospective evaluation of successful terminal ileum intubation during routine colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 40:544–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zwas FR, Bonheim NA, Berken CA, Gray S (1995) Diagnostic yield of routine ileoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 90:1441–1443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iacopini G, Frontespezi S, Vitale MA, Villotti G, Bella A, d’Alba L, De Cesare A, Iacopini F (2006) Routine ileoscopy at colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of learning curve and skill-keeping line. Gastrointest Endosc 63:250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Kennedy
    • 1
  • David Larson
    • 2
  • Bruce Wolff
    • 2
  • Desmond Winter
    • 2
  • Bret Petersen
    • 3
  • Mark Larson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryMayo ClinicSW RochesterUSA
  3. 3.Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations