Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 2625–2630 | Cite as

Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer

  • Albert C. Y. Chan
  • Jensen T. C. Poon
  • Joe K. M. Fan
  • Siu Hung Lo
  • Wai Lun Law
Article

Abstract

Background

Long-term outcome of patients with conversion following laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer has seldom been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of conversion on the operative outcome and survival of patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy.

Methods

An analysis of a prospectively collected database of 470 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy between May 2000 and December 2006 was performed. The operative results and long-term outcomes of patients with conversion were compared with those with successful laparoscopic operations.

Results

The overall conversion rate to open surgery was 8.7% (41 patients). There was no difference in age, comorbid illness, location of tumor, and stage of disease between the laparoscopic and conversion groups. The most common reasons for conversion include adhesions (34.1%), tumor invasion into adjacent structures (17.1%), bulky tumor (9.8%), and uncontrolled hemorrhage (9.8%). A male preponderance was observed in the conversion group. Tumor size was significantly larger in the conversion group compared with the laparoscopic group (5 versus 4 cm, P = 0.002). Although there was no difference in the operative time between the two groups, increased perioperative blood loss (461.9 vs. 191.2 ml, P < 0.001), increased postoperative complication rate (56.1% versus 16.7%, P = 0.001) and prolonged median hospital stay (10 versus 6 days, P < 0.001) were associated with the conversion group. Consequently, patients in the conversion group were more likely to develop local recurrence (9.8% versus 2.8%, P < 0.001) with a significantly reduced cumulative cancer-free survival.

Conclusion

The disease-free survival and the local recurrence were significantly worse by the presence of conversion in laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy. Adoption of a standardized operative strategy may improve the perioperative outcome after conversion.

Keywords

Laparoscopic colectomy Cancer Conversion Outcome 

References

  1. 1.
    Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC et al (2004) Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc 18(5):732–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR et al (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132(1):41–44; discussion 45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gervaz P, Pikarsky A, Utech M et al (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 15(8):827–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA et al (2000) Predicting conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal resections. A simple clinical model. Surg Endosc 14(12):1114–1117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49(2):197–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 19(1):47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 47(10):1680–1685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belizon A, Sardinha CT, Sher ME (2006) Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences? Surg Endosc 20(6):947–951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C et al (2001) Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 44(2):207–214; discussion 214–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ et al (2004) Operative blood loss and use of blood products after laparoscopic and conventional open colorectal operations. Arch Surg 139(1):39–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agachan F, Joo JS, Sher M et al (1997) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do we get faster? Surg Endosc 11(4):331–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2004) Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 199(5):675–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46(4):503–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert C. Y. Chan
    • 1
  • Jensen T. C. Poon
    • 1
  • Joe K. M. Fan
    • 1
  • Siu Hung Lo
    • 1
  • Wai Lun Law
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Queen Mary HospitalUniversity of Hong Kong Medical CentreKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations