Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 11, pp 2445–2449 | Cite as

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study

  • Istvan Gal
  • Tamas Solymosi
  • Zoltan Szabo
  • Alexander Balint
  • Gyorgy Bolgar
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Since the first description of the minimally invasive totally gasless video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) technique in 1998, relatively few studies have evaluated the outcome of this procedure. The authors review their experiences based on a prospective randomized trial comparing the potential advantages of MIVAT over conventional thyroidectomy.

Methods

Patients undergoing surgery for either thyroid nodule or diffuse thyroid disease with hyperthyroidism were randomly selected for either MIVAT or conventional thyroidectomy. The exclusion criteria specified nodules larger than 35 mm, thyroid lobe volume greater than 20 ml, thyroiditis, and previous neck irradiation or surgery. Operative time, postoperative complications, and cosmetic results were evaluated using both a verbal response scale and a numeric scale.

Results

Both the MIVAT group and the conventional thyroidectomy group included 15 patients. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of age, sex, or indication for operation. The mean operative times were 65.5 ± 18 min. for MIVAT and 43.3 ± 14 min. for conventional thyroidectomy (P = 0.001). No postoperative complications were detected in either group. The cosmetic results, evaluated by both verbal response and numeric scales, were respectively as follows: MIVAT (3.7 ± 0.2 and 7.9 ± 1.2) and conventional thyroidectomy (2.3 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 1.3). The differences significantly favored MIVAT (P = 0.028 and P = 0.015, respectively) despite the small number of patients enrolled in this study, and consequently, its limited statistical power.

Conclusion

Although the complications are comparable between the two approaches, conventional thyroidectomy involves less operative time. However, MIVAT offers distinct advantages to selected patients in terms of very good to exellent cosmetic results and reduced postoperative distress.

Keywords

Video-assisted thyroidectomy Conventional thyroidectomy Randomized study Cosmetic results 

References

  1. 1.
    Huscher CS, Recher A, Napolitano G, Chiodini S (1997) Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc 11:877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeung GH (1998) Endoscopic surgery of the neck: a new frontier. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:227–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C (1999) Minimally invasive surgery for small thyroid nodules: preliminary report. J Endocrinol Invest 22:849–851PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shimazu K, Akira S, Jasmi AY, Kitamura Y, Kitagawa W, Akasu H (1999) Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with very minimal neck wound. J Am Coll Surg 188:697–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kapischke M, Bley K, Deltz E (2003) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroid resection (MIVAT): a well-accepted operative procedure. Zentralbl Chir 128:652–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan CP, Yang LH, Chang HC, Chen YL, Chen ST, Kuo SJ, Tsai PC (2003) An easier technique for minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Int Surg 88:109–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miccoli P, Bellantone R, Mourad M, Walz M, Raffaelli M, Berti P (2002) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: multi-institutional experience. World J Surg 26:972–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Baldacci S, Rossi G (2002) Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 130:1039–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inabnet WB, Jacob BP, Gagner M (2003) Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy by a cervical approach. Surg Endosc 17:1808–1811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimazu K, Shiba E, Tamaki Y, Takiguchi S, Taniguchi E, Ohashi S, Noguchi S (2003) Endoscopic thyroid surgery through the axillo-bilateral-breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:196–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park YL, Han WK, Bae WG (2003) 100 cases of endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gagner M, Inabnet WB (2001) Endoscopic thyroidectomy for solitary thyroid nodules. Thyroid 11:161–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manolidis S, Takashima M, Kirby M, Scarlett M (2001) Thyroid surgery: a comparison of outcomes between experts and surgeons in training. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:30–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lo Gerfo P (1998) Local/regional anesthesia for thyroidectomy: evaluation as an outpatient procedure. Surgery 124:975–979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bellantone R, Lombardi PC, Raffaelli M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Traini E (2002) Video-assisted thyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 194:610–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S (2003) Clinical benefits in endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 196:189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G, Conte M, Galleri D (2002) Impact of harmonic scalpel on operative time during video-assisted thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 16:663–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Modesti C, Boscherini M, Bellantone R (2004) Video-assisted thyroidectomy under local anesthesia. Am J Surg 187:515–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dralle H, Lorenz K, Nguyen-Thanh P (1999) Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy: selective approach to localised single gland adenoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:556–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sackett WR, Barraclough B, Reeve TS, Delbridge LW (2002) Worldwide trends in the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in the era of minimally invasive. Parathyroidectomy 137:1055–1059Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, Vignali E, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (1999) Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 126:1117–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Istvan Gal
    • 1
  • Tamas Solymosi
    • 1
  • Zoltan Szabo
    • 2
  • Alexander Balint
    • 1
  • Gyorgy Bolgar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryBugat Pal University HospitalGyongyosHungary
  2. 2.Microsurgery and Operative Endoscopy Training (MOET) InstituteSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations