Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 884–884 | Cite as

When sleeve gastrectomy fails: adding a laparoscopic adjustable gastric band to increase restriction

  • Alexander J. Greenstein
  • Anthony J. Vine
  • Brian P. JacobEmail author


The use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a procedure for morbid obesity has recently increased. The LSG procedure is used most often as a part of a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS) or as a first stage that can be converted to a BPDDS or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) [1, 2]. However, the surgical indications for LSG have rapidly expanded, and some centers use the sleeve as the primary operation for morbid obesity [3, 4].

The utility of LSG as a primary procedure is controversial, with consensus lacking in the literature. Whether the etiology of failed sufficient weight loss is the result of an inadequate sleeve or attributable to dilation or hypertrophy of the sleeve, the incidence of failed sleeve gastrectomies may be significant.

In the treatment of a patient with a failed LSG, the options typically include creation of a tighter sleeve or conversion to biliopancreatic diversion or RYGB [5]. These procedures, however, are complex and can carry significant morbidity.

The authors report a case of a morbidly obese 42-year-old man who failed to lose sufficient weight after an LSG. Because the patient was dependent on several oral antipsychotic medications, he refused any malabsorptive procedure, and a decision was made to proceed with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The case proceeded successfully, and at this writing, 9 months after surgery, the patient has achieved a 57% excess weight loss from an original weight of 390 lb.

The insertion of an LAGB into its normal anatomic position is feasible after a sleeve gastrectomy, and its use can induce sufficient restriction and weight loss results equivalent to those of a sleeve or band alone and possibly better.


Band Gastrectomy Laparoscopic Obesity Revision Sleeve 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (WMV 46266 kb)


  1. 1.
    Hess DS, Hess DW (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg 8:267–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, Lebel S, Bourque RA, Potvin M, Biron S (1998) Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg 22:947–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N, Bou R, Bengochea M, Ferri L (2005) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multipurpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg 15:1124–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hamoui N, Anthone GJ, Kaufman HS, Crookes PF (2006) Sleeve gastrectomy in the high-risk patient. Obes Surg 16:1445–1449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gagner M, Rogula T (2003) Laparoscopic reoperative sleeve gastrectomy for poor weight loss after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg 13:649–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander J. Greenstein
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Vine
    • 1
  • Brian P. Jacob
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations