Surgical Endoscopy

, 23:969 | Cite as

Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form?

  • Ram Elazary
  • Abed Khalaileh
  • Gideon Zamir
  • Michael Har-Lev
  • Gidon Almogy
  • Avraham I. Rivkind
  • Yoav Mintz
Article

Abstract

Introduction

NOTES cholecystectomy, may eliminate complications related to abdominal incisions. However, the nonmandatory gastrotomy and its safe closure is the main controversy accompanying this approach. Transvaginal access has minimal closure consequences but the safety of inserting extralong instruments between the intestines and having the angle of approach from below rather than from above is questionable. We conducted a study for performing cholecystectomy using a single laparoscopic trocar.

Methods

The single-trocar cholecystectomy technique was developed on five porcine animal models weighing 35–40 kg each. A 15-mm trocar was used, inserted transumbilicaly. Retraction of the gallbladder was achieved using an endoloop and transabdominal anchoring. Hartman’s pouch was manipulated with an endoscopic grasper, which was passed through the working channel of the endoscope, while dissection of the triangle of Callot was performed using articulating laparoscopic instruments.

Results

Single-trocar cholecystectomy was successfully performed in four of five porcine models. Average surgery time was 90 min (35–180 min). The technique was modified and improved throughout the study. No intraoperative complications occurred.

Conclusions

Single-trocar cholecystectomy is feasible and offers safe approach to this procedure. We assume that a single incision at the umbilicus generates minimal somatic pain, and achieves excellent cosmetic results. The translation of this technique to human subjects seems straightforward and raises the question of whether NOTES is the preferred technique for cholecystectomy.

Keywords

Cholecystectomy Gallbladder Trocar Single Laparoscopy Endoscope 

Abbreviations

LC

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

NOTES

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by Ethicon Endosurgery, Cincinnatti, OH, USA.

References

  1. 1.
    Legorreta AP et al (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 270:1429–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lam CM, Murray FE, Cuschieri A (1996) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland. Gut 38:282–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steiner CA, Bass EB, Talamini MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP (1994) Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Engl J Med 330:403–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr et al (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg 19:394–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kagaya T (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the “Twin-Port” system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 8:76–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A (1998) Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, O’Rourke NA, Maddern GJ (2008) A review of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg 247:583–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego JM et al (2007) Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesical combined approach. Gastrointest Endosc 65:111–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu JF, Hu H, Ma YZ, Xu MZ, Li F (2008) Transumbilical endoscopic surgery: a preliminary clinical report. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rané A, Rao P, Rao P (2008) Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port). Urology 72:260–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mintz Y, Horgan S, Savu MK, Cullen J, Chock A, Ramamoorthy S, Easter DW, Talamini MA (2008) Hybrid natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES) sleeve gastrectomy: a feasibility study using an animal model. Surg Endosc 22:1798–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ram Elazary
    • 1
  • Abed Khalaileh
    • 1
  • Gideon Zamir
    • 1
  • Michael Har-Lev
    • 2
  • Gidon Almogy
    • 1
  • Avraham I. Rivkind
    • 1
  • Yoav Mintz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryHadassah-Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Authority for Animal FacilitesHadassah-Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations