Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1456–1459 | Cite as

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique results in a high recurrence rate

  • B. M. E. Hansson
  • R. P. Bleichrodt
  • I. H. de Hingh
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Parastomal herniation is a common complication of stoma formation, and its operative treatment is notoriously difficult. Recently we have reported the promising short-term results of a keyhole technique in which a Gore-Tex Dual Mesh with a central keyhole is laparoscopically fashioned around the bowel to close the hernia. In the long-term, recurrence is one of the major issues in hernia repair, therefore, this aspect was prospectively investigated.

Methods

Since 2002, a total of 55 consecutive patients (27 men; median age, 63 years) with a symptomatic primary (n = 45) or recurrent parastomal hernia (n = 10) were electively operated using this technique. Patients were invited to the outpatient clinic on a regular basis and were examined for the occurrence of a recurrent hernia. At the last visit, all patients were asked to complete a short questionnaire.

Results

Median follow-up (98%) was 36 (range, 12–72) months. During follow-up a recurrent parastomal hernia was diagnosed in 20 patients (37%). Three recurrences were asymptomatic and were treated conservatively. The other 17 patients (85%) developed mild-to-severe symptoms necessitating redo-surgery in 9 (45%) patients. Surprisingly, satisfaction with the procedure was high among patients (89%), even in the presence of a recurrence. Patients who reported unsatisfactory results belonged mainly to the group in whom the initial laparoscopic approach had to be converted to an open procedure.

Conclusions

Based on the results from the present study, which represents one of the largest patient series with the longest follow up available to date, it is concluded that laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a keyhole technique has an intolerably high recurrence rate with the currently available meshes. A new mesh with a less pliable central part and without the tendency to shrink is awaited.

Keywords

Hernia Clinical papers Trials Research Abdominal Surgical Technical 

References

  1. 1.
    Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP (1988) Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg 75:416–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger D, Bientzle M (2007) Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernias: a single surgeon’s experience in 66 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1668–1673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheung MT, Chia NH, Chiu WY (2001) Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 44:266–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansson BM, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Bleichrodt RP (2003) Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1789–1791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hansson BM, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP (2007) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and safe: early results of a prospective clinical study including 55 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 21:989–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R, Mertens PR, Kirch J, Klosterhalfen B, Lynen P, Schumpelick V (2004) Decreased collagen type I/III ratio in patients with recurring hernia after implantation of alloplastic prostheses. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:17–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koehler RH, Begos D, Berger D, Carey S, LeBlanc K, Park A, Ramshaw B, Smoot R, Voeller G (2003) Minimal adhesions to ePTFE mesh after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: reoperative findings in 65 cases. JSLS 7:335–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mancini GJ, McClusky DA III, Khaitan L, Goldenberg EA, Heniford BT, Novitsky YW, Park AE, Kavic S, LeBlanc KA, Elieson MJ, Voeller GR, Ramshaw BJ (2007) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a non-slit mesh technique. Surg Endosc 21:1487–1491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rieger N, Moore J, Hewett P, Lee S, Stephens J (2004) Parastomal hernia repair. Colorectal Dis 6:203–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosch R, Junge K, Knops M, Lynen P, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2003) Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:427–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simmermacher RKJ, van der Lei B, Schakenraad JM, Bleichrodt RP (1991) Improved tissue ingrowth and anchorage of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene by perforation: an experimental study in the rat. Biomaterials 12:22–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simmermacher RKJ, Bleichrodt RP, Schakenraad JM (1992) Review: biomaterials for abdominal wall reconstruction. Cells Mater 4:281–290Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simmermacher RKJ, Schakenraad JM, Bleichrodt RP (1994) Reherniation after repair of the abdominal wall with polytetrafluoroethylene. JACS 178:613–616Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sugarbaker PH (1985) Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg 201:344–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. M. E. Hansson
    • 1
  • R. P. Bleichrodt
    • 2
  • I. H. de Hingh
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCanisius Wilhelmina HospitalNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryRadboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen Nijmegen The Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryCatharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven Eindhoven The Netherlands

Personalised recommendations