Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 2005–2010 | Cite as

Endoscopic management of anastomotic hemorrhage from pancreatogastrostomy

  • Jens Standop
  • Nico Schäfer
  • Marcus Overhaus
  • Volker Schmitz
  • Lissie Ladwein
  • Andreas Hirner
  • Jörg C. Kalff



Hemorrhage from pancreatic-enteric anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a critical condition due to its difficult accessibility and delicate condition, and therefore remains a major challenge for the surgeon in charge.


This study analyzed presentation and management of pancreatogastrostomy hemorrhage (PGH) after PD to determine the respective roles of endoscopy and surgery.

Patients and methods

Patients who underwent PD with pancreatogastrostomy between 1989 and January 2008 were identified from a pancreatic resection database and analyzed with regards to PGH, treatment strategy and outcome, and incidence of postoperative complications.


Out of 265 consecutive patients with PD, 10 patients (3.7%) experienced an episode of PGH, detected on average on postoperative day 5. No patient with PGH died during hospital stay as opposed to a mortality rate of 2.7% in patients without PGH. Morbidity rates were 50% versus 48% and length of hospital stay was 23 versus 21 days for patients with and without PGH, respectively, with no statistical differences between the groups. Endoscopic approach to control PGH was successful in nine patients. Pancreatogastrostomies were not compromised regarding procedure or air insufflations and no concomitant development of pancreatic fistula was observed. Open surgery was inevitable in one patient with recurrent PGH in order to achieve hemostasis, but resulted in pancreatic fistula and protracted hospital stay.


The present study demonstrates a feasible endoscopic approach for the management of PGH with high success rate and no concomitant procedure-related morbidity.


Pancreatic anastomosis Pancreatogastrostomy Hemorrhage Endoscopic hemostasis Pancreatoduodenectomy 


  1. 1.
    Koukoutsis I, Bellagamba R, Morris-Stiff G, Wickremesekera S, Coldham C, Wigmore SJ, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the importance of sentinel bleed. Dig Surg 23:224–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanc T, Cortes A, Goere D, Sibert A, Pessaux P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A (2007) Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is surgery still indicated? Am J Surg 194:3–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Gutt CN, Buchler MW, Friess H (2006) Management of early hemorrhage from pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 23:203–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Buchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Standop J, Overhaus M, Schaefer N, Decker D, Wolff M, Hirner A, Tuerler A (2005) Pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a safe, feasible reconstruction method? World J Surg 29:505–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Buchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Connor S (2006) Haemorrhage following pancreatoduodenectomy: the importance of surgery. Dig Surg 23:201–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Salena BJ, Laine LA (1992) Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 102:139–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sung JJ, Tsoi KK, Lai LH, Wu JC, Lau JY (2007) Endoscopic clipping versus injection and thermo-coagulation in the treatment of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Gut 56:1364–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert JP (2007) Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005584.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, Bianco MA, D’Angella R, Cipolletta L (2007) Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 102:279–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Kaifi J, Schurr PG, Bubenheim M, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Izbicki JR (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD (2004) Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 8:951–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI (2004) Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 199:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Heek NT, Kuhlmann KF, Scholten RJ, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg 242:781–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245:777–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Standop
    • 1
  • Nico Schäfer
    • 1
  • Marcus Overhaus
    • 1
  • Volker Schmitz
    • 2
  • Lissie Ladwein
    • 1
  • Andreas Hirner
    • 1
  • Jörg C. Kalff
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Bonn Medical CenterBonnGermany
  2. 2.Department of GastroenterologyUniversity of Bonn Medical CenterBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations