Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 1286–1291 | Cite as

Role of three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: preliminary results

  • Sthela M. Murad-Regadas
  • Francisco Sergio P. Regadas
  • Lusmar V. Rodrigues
  • Rosilma G. L. Barreto
  • Francisco Coracy C. Monteiro
  • Beethoven B. Landim
  • Erico C. Holanda
Article

Abstract

Background

Three-dimensional anorectal ultrasound (3-DAUS) scanning provides accurate information on tumor size and its relation to the anal muscles. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of 3-DAUS to assess response to radiochemotherapy (RCT) for rectal cancer by comparing 3-DAUS images to pathological findings.

Methods

Twenty-five patients (mean age 52.4 years), staged as T2 (n = 3), T3 (n = 16) or T4 (n = 6), with lymph node metastases in 12 cases, were submitted to neoadjuvant RCT, followed by a second 3-DAUS scan 7 weeks later. The patients were grouped according to the distance (cm) between the distal tumor edge and the proximal border of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) (group I, presenting anal canal invasion; group II, ≤2.0 cm; group III, >2.0 cm). All patients were operated on and the pathological findings were compared to post-RCT 3-DAUS scanning results.

Results

Four (16%) patients (three in group I, one in group II) experienced complete tumor regression. Fourteen (56%) tumors (six in group I, seven in group II, and one in group III) regressed partially. Distance to the IAS was >2.0 cm in eight patients (seven in group II and one in group III). The remaining six (24%) patients (all group I) experienced no regression. 3-DAUS and pathological findings were concordant in 24 (96%) patients, with only one (4%) nonconclusive post-RCT 3-DAUS result found to be a residual tumor. Tumor regression made sphincter-saving surgery possible in 13 patients (eight in group III, four complete tumor regression, and one nonconclusive on 3-DAUS). Pathological examination revealed free distal margins in all cases. The index of agreement between lymph node metastases on post-RCT 3-DAUS and surgical specimens was moderate (84%).

Conclusion

3-DAUS can aid significantly in the choice of surgical approach following RCT. However, a greater sample of patients is required to establish sufficiently accurate post-RCT 3-DAUS parameters.

Keywords

Ultrasonography Colorectal cancer Radiology 

References

  1. 1.
    Katsura Y, Yamada K, Ishizawa T, Yoshinaka H, Shimazu H (1992) Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymphnode metastasis in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 35:362–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dr Adams, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM, et Ternent CA, Thorson AG, Christensen MA (1999) Use of preoperative ultrasound staging for treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 42:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maier GA, Kreuzer SH, Herbst F, Wrba F, Schima W, Funovics MA, Teleky BK, Lechner GL (2000) Transrectal sonography of anal sphincter infiltration in lower rectal carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 175:735–739Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunerbein M, Pegios W, Rau B, Vogl TJ, Felix R, Schlag PM (2000) Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results. Surg Endosc 14:1005–1009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JC, Cho YK, Kim SY, Park SK, Lee MG (2002) Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonograpy used in rectal cancer staging. Surg Endosc 16:1280–1285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rau B, Hunerbein M, Barth C, Wust P (1999) Accuracy of endorectal ultrasound after preoperative radiochematherapy in local advanced rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 13:980–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williamson PR, Hellinger MD, Larach SW, Ferarra A (1996) Endorectal ultrasound of T3 and T4 rectal cancers after preoperative chemoradiation. Dis Colon Rectum 39:45–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Napoleon B, Pujol B, Berger F, Valette PJ, Gerard JP, Souquet JC (1991) Accuracy of endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer treated by radiotherapy. Br J Surg 78:785–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vanagunas A, Lin DE, Stryker SJ (2004) Accuracy of endoscopio ultrasound for restaging rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 99:109–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barbaro B, Schulsinger A, Valentín V, Marano P, Rotman M (1999) The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in predicting the pathological stage of low-lying rectl cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:1043–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calvo FA, Domper M, Matute R, Martinez-Lazaro R, Arranz JA, Desco M, Alvarez E, Carreras JL (2004) 18F-FDG positron emission tomography staging and restaging in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Phys 58:528–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caprici C, Rubello D, Chierichetti F, Crepaldi G, Carpi A, Nicolini A, Mandoliti G, Polico C (2004) Restating after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma:role of 18-FDG PET. Biomed Pharmacother 58:451–457Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deneck T, Rau B, Hoffmann KT, Hildebrandt B, Ruf J, Gutberlet M, Hunerbein M, Felix R, Wust P, Amthauer H (2005) Comparison of CT, MRI and FDG-PET in response prediction of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal preoperative therapy: is benefit in using functional imaging. Eur Radiol 15:1658–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maretto I, Pomerri F, Pucciarelli S, Mescoli C, Belluco E, Burzi S, Rugge M, Muzzio PC, Nitti D (2007) The potential of restaging in the prediction of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:455–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP (2008) Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography in benign and malignant rectal neoplasias. In: Pescatori M, Regadas FSP, Murad-Regadas SM, Zbar AP (eds) Imaging atlas of the pelvic floor and anorectal diseases. Springer-Verlag, Italia, pp 91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hildrebant U, Fiefel G (1985) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by intrarectal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 28:42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wheeler JMD, Warren BF, McC Morten NJ, Ekanyaka N, Kulacoglu H, Jones AC, George BD, Kettlewell MGW (2002) Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation. A propostal for a modified staging system. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1051–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gavioli M, Bagni A, Piccagli I, Fundaro S, Natalini G (2000) Usefulness of endorectal ultrasound after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Comparison between sonographic and histopathologic. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1075–1083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Regadas FSP, Murad-Regadas SM, Lima DMR, Silva FR, Barreto RGL, Souza MHLP, Regadas Filho FSP (2007) Anal canal anatomy showed by three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Surg Endosc 21:2207–2211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stipa F, Chessin DB, Shia J, Paty PB, Weise M, Temple LKF, Minsky BD, Wong D, Guillem JG (2006) A pathologic complete response of rectal cancer to preoperative combined-modality therapy results in improved oncological outcome compared with those who achieve no downstaging on the basis of preoperative endorectal ultrasonography. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1047–1053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahn H, Alexander A, Rakinic J, Nagle D, Fry R (1997) Preoperative staging of irradiated of irradiated cancers using digital rectal exam, computed tomography, endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging does not accurately predict T0, N0 pathology. Dis Colon Rectum 40:140–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minsk BD, Cohan AM, Enker WE, Paty P (1995) Sphincter preservation with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:553–559Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Habr-Gama A, de Souza PM, Rebeiro U Jr (1998) Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1087–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sthela M. Murad-Regadas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francisco Sergio P. Regadas
    • 1
  • Lusmar V. Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Rosilma G. L. Barreto
    • 1
  • Francisco Coracy C. Monteiro
    • 1
  • Beethoven B. Landim
    • 1
  • Erico C. Holanda
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySchool of Medicine of the Federal University of CearaFortaleza, CearáBrazil
  2. 2.Fortaleza, CearáBrazil

Personalised recommendations