Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 482–486 | Cite as

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: lessons learned from 3,100 hernia repairs over 15 years

  • Jean-Louis Dulucq
  • Pascal Wintringer
  • Ahmad Mahajna
Article

Abstract

Background

Two revolutions in inguinal hernia repair surgery have occurred during the last two decades. The first was the introduction of tension-free hernia repair by Liechtenstein in 1989 and the second was the application of laparoscopic surgery to the treatment of inguinal hernia in the early 1990s. The purposes of this study were to assess the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and to discuss the technical changes that we faced on the basis of our accumulative experience.

Methods

Patients who underwent an elective inguinal hernia repair at the Department of Abdominal Surgery at the Institute of Laparoscopic Surgery (ILS), Bordeaux, between June 1990 and May 2005 were enrolled retrospectively in this study. Patient demographic data, operative and postoperative course, and outpatient follow-up were studied.

Results

A total of 3,100 hernia repairs were included in the study. The majority of the hernias were repaired by TEP technique; the repair was done by transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair in only 3%. Eleven percent of the hernias were recurrences after conventional repair. Mean operative time was 17 min in unilateral hernia and 24 min in bilateral hernia. There were 36 hernias (1.2%) that required conversion: 12 hernias were converted to open anterior Liechtenstein and 24 to laparoscopic TAPP technique. The incidence of intraoperative complications was low. Most of the patients were discharged at the second day of the surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 2.2%. The incidence of recurrence rate was 0.35%. The recurrence rate for the first 200 repairs was 2.5%, but it decreased to 0.47% for the subsequent 1,254 hernia repairs

Conclusion

According to our experience, in the hands of experienced laparoscopic surgeons, laparoscopic hernia repair seems to be the favored approach for most types of inguinal hernias. TEP is preferred over TAPP as the peritoneum is not violated and there are fewer intra-abdominal complications.

Keywords

Inguinal hernia Totally extra peritoneal repair Laparoscopic repair 3-D mesh 

References

  1. 1.
    Bassini E (1887) Sulla cura radicle dell’erinea inguinale. Arch Soc Ital Chir 4:380Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dulucq JL (1991) Traitement des hernies de l’aine par la mise en place d’un patch prothetique par laparoscopie. Voi totalement extraperitoneale. Cah Chir 79:15–16Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dulucq JL (2005) Tips and techniques in laparoscopic surgery (totally extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic hernia repair). Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rutkow IM (1998) Epidemiology, economic and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s. Surg Clin North Am 73:413–426Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzgibbons RJ, Camps J, Cornet DA et al (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221:3–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE et al (1995) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 169:84–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ et al (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein—a prospective randomized controlled trail. Ann Surg 237:142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P et al (1998) A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extra-peritoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein operation among employed patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:338–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pawanindra L, Kajla RK, Chander J et al (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17:850–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barrat C, Surlin V, Bordia A et al (2003) Management of recurrent inguinal hernias: a prospective study of 163 cases. Hernia 7:125–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sayad P, Ferzli G (1999) Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9(2):127–130Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Camps J, Nguyen N, Annabali R et al (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: transabdominal techniques. Int Surg 80:18–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MH Jr (1995) Laparoscopic hernioplasty: TAPP vs. TEP. Surg Endosc 9:984–989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sosa JL, Puente I, Markley M et al (1994) A modified technique of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: operative approach and early results. Int Surg 79:300–303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wishart GC, Wright D, O’Dwyer PJ (1995) Use of a Foley catheter to dissect the preperitoneal space for extraperitoneal endoscopic hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Surg 5:27–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dulucq JL (1992) Treatment of inguinal hernias by insertion of mesh through retroperitoneoscopy. Post Graduate General Surg 4:173–174Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dulucq JL (2000) Pre-peritoneal approach in laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernia. J Chir 137(5):285–288Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khoury N (1995) A comparative study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Surg 5:349–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahajna A (2006) Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair after radical prostatectomy or previous lower abdominal surgery: is it safe? A prospective study. Surg Endosc 20(3):473–476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ferzli G, Sayad P, Huie F, Hallak A, Usal H (1998) Endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy—a 5-year experience. Surg Endosc 12:1311–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) Cost–utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liem MS, Halsema JA, Van der graaf Y et al (1997) Cost effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Coala trial group. Ann Surg 226:668–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Swanstron LL (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repairs: the importance of cost as an outcome measurement at the century’s end. Surg Clin North Am 80:1341–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowne WB, Morgenthal CB, Castro AE et al (2007) The role of endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: where do we stand in 2005? Surg Endosc 21(5):707–712Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Louis Dulucq
    • 1
  • Pascal Wintringer
    • 1
  • Ahmad Mahajna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Abdominal SurgeryMaison de Santé Protestante, Bagatelle HospitalTalence-BordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations