Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 745–749 | Cite as

Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation

  • Jorma HalttunenEmail author
  • Ilona Keränen
  • Marianne Udd
  • Leena Kylänpää
Article

Abstract

Background

In endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) difficult cannulation is an independent risk factor for complications.

Methods

Altogether 6,209 ERCPs were performed in Helsinki University Central Hospital in the period 1996–2006. In 558 cases (9%) without a previous sphincterotomy, direct access into the biliary duct could not be achieved. In this group access was attempted by first performing a pancreatic sphincterotomy in 351 difficult cannulation cases (63%). A needle knife precut without a pancreatic sphincterotomy was performed in 178 cases (32%). All the necessary clinical and laboratory information was available for 262 of the 351 patients who had undergone a pancreatic sphincterotomy and for 157 of the 178 patients who had been subjected to needle knife precutting, and these data were further evaluated in this study.

Results

The pancreatic sphincterotomy technique was successful in 255 cases (97.3%). Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 8.8% of the pancreatic sphincterotomy group. In 147 patients, biliary cannulation was successful following a pancreatic sphincterotomy, and the post-ERCP pancreatitis rate for those patients was 9.3%. In 108 patients, a needle knife papillotomy, in addition to a pancreatic sphincterotomy, was necessary and resulted in a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 8.2%.

In the needle knife precut group only, post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 5.1% of cases. Biliary cannulation succeeded less frequently following needle knife precutting than following the pancreatic sphincterotomy technique (71.3% versus 97.3%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the post-ERCP pancreatitis rate between the precut and pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques (p = 0.16).

Conclusions

In difficult cannulation, a pancreatic sphincterotomy to achieve deep biliary duct cannulation can be performed with a high success rate (failure rate less than 3%). The corresponding success rate using the needle knife precut technique is 71%. In both methods the risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis is comparable to that of a standard biliary sphincterotomy.

Keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography Technique Complication Pancreatitis 

Abbreviations

EPT

Endoscopic papillotomy

ERCP

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography

References

  1. 1.
    Freeman M, Guda N (2005) ERCP cannulation, a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 61:112–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freeman M, Nelson D, Sherman S, Haber G, Herman M, Dorsher P, Moore J, Fennerty M, Ryan M, Shaw M, Lande J, Pheley A (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 26:909–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Freeman M (2002) Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56(6 Suppl):S273–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cortas G, Mehta S, Abraham N, Barkun A (1999) Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 50:775–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwacha H, Allgaier H, Deibert P, Olschewski M, Allgaier U, Blum H (2000) A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 52:387–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Freeman M, DiSario J, Nelson D, Fennerty M, Lee J, Bjorkman D, Overby C, Aas J, Ryan M, Bochna G, Shaw M, Snady H, Erickson R, Moore J, Roel J (2001) Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 54:425–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vandervoort J, Soetikno R, Tham T, Wong R, Ferrari A, Montes H, Roston A, Slivka A, Lichtenstein D, Ruymann F, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke D (2002) Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 56:652–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demling L (1983) Papillotomy—indications and technique. Endoscopy 15(1 Suppl):S162–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni P (2003) Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 35:830–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fuji T, Amano H, Harima K, Aibe T, Asagami F, Kinukawa K, Ariyama S, Takemoto T (1985) Pancreatic sphincterotomy and pancreatic endoprosthesis. Endoscopy 17:69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goff J (1995) Common bile duct pre-cut sphincterotomy: transpancreatic sphincter approach. Gastrointest Endosc 41:502–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lempinen M, Stenman U-H, Halttunen J, Puolakkainen P, Haapiainen R, Kemppainen E (2005) Early sequential changes in serum markers of acute pancreatitis induced by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Pancreatology 5:157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akashi R, Kiyozumi T, Jinnouchi K, Yoshida M, Adachi Y, Sagara K (2004) Pancreatic sphincter precutting to gain selective access to the common bile duct: a series of 172 patients. Endoscopy 36:405–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Catalano M, Linder J, Geenen J (2004) Endoscopic transpancreatic papillary septotomy for inaccessible obstructed bile ducts: comparison with standard pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 60:557–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kahaleh M, Tokar J, Mullick T, Bickston S, Yeaton P (2004) prospective evaluation of pancreatic sphincterotomy as a precut technique for biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:971–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kapetanos D, Kokozidis G, Christodoulou D, Mistakidis K, Dimakopoulos K, Katodritou E, Kitis G, Tsianos E (2007) Case series of transpancreatic septotomy as precutting technique for difficult bile duct cannulation. Endoscopy 39:802–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goff J (1999) Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 50:642–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Osnes M, Kahrs T (1977) Endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy for choledocholithiasis through choledochoduodenal fistula. Endoscopy 9:162–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tweedle D, Martin D (1991) Needle knife papillotomy for endoscopic sphincterotomy and cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 37:518–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kemppainen E, Hedström J, Puolakkainen P, Halttunen J, Sainio V, Haapiainen R, Kivilaakso E, Stenman U-H (1997) Increased serum trypsinogen 2 and trypsin-alpha 1 antitrypsin complex values identify endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced pancreatitis with high accuracy. Gut 41:690–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorma Halttunen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ilona Keränen
    • 1
  • Marianne Udd
    • 1
  • Leena Kylänpää
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal and General SurgeryHelsinki University Central HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Gastrointestinal and General SurgeryUniversity of Helsinki, Meilahti HospitalHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations