Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 11, pp 2416–2420 | Cite as

Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of music on the virtual reality laparoscopic learning performance of novice surgeons

  • D. MiskovicEmail author
  • R. Rosenthal
  • U. Zingg
  • D. Oertli
  • U. Metzger
  • L. Jancke



Findings have shown that music affects cognitive performance, but little is known about its influence on surgical performance. The hypothesis of this randomized controlled trial was that arousing (activating) music has a beneficial effect on the surgical performance of novice surgeons in the setting of a laparoscopic virtual reality task.


For this study, 45 junior surgeons with no previous laparoscopic experience were randomly assigned to three equal groups. Group 1 listened to activating music; group 2 listened to deactivating music; and group 3 had no music (control) while each participant solved a surgical task five times on a virtual laparoscopic simulator. The assessed global task score, the total task time, the instrument travel distances, and the surgeons’ heart rate were assessed.


All surgical performance parameters improved significantly with experience (task repetition). The global score showed a trend for a between-groups difference, suggesting that the group listening to activating music had the worst performance. This observation was supported by a significant between-groups difference for the first trial but not subsequent trials (activating music, 35 points; deactivating music, 66 points; no music, 91 points; p = 0.002). The global score (p = 0.056) and total task time (p = 0.065) showed a trend toward improvement when participants considered the music pleasant rather than unpleasant.


Music in the operating theater may have a distracting effect on novice surgeons performing new tasks. Surgical trainers should consider categorically switching off music during teaching procedures.


Laparoscopy Music Performance Simulation Surgical training/courses 


Conflict of Interest

The corresponding author discloses on behalf of all authors any conflict of interest including any financial interests and relationships. There was no sponsoring for this study.


  1. 1.
    Wakin D (2006) While in surgery, do you prefer Abba or Verdi? The New York Times. Retrieved 10 June 2006 at
  2. 2.
    Riley R (2006) The MP3 surgeon and the opera fan. Med J Aust 184:255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rauscher F, Shaw G, Ky K (1993) Music and spatial task performance. Nature 365:611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steele K, Bass K, Crook M (1999) The mystery of the Mozart effect: failure to replicate. Psych Sci 10:366–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Munte T, Altenmuller E, Jancke L (2002) The musician’s brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:473–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peretz I, Zatorre R (2005) Brain organization for music processing. Annu Rev Psychol 56:89–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schellenberg E (2001) Music and nonmusical abilities. Ann N Y Acad Sci 930:355–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zatorre R (2003) Music and the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 999:4–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baumgartner T, Lutz K, Schmidt C, Jancke L (2006) The emotional power of music: how music enhances the feeling of affective pictures. Brain Res 1075:151–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jancke L (2006) From cognition to action. In: Altenmueller E, Wiesendanger M, Kesselring J (eds) Music, motor control, and the brain, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 25–38Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allen K, Blascovich J (1994) Effects of music on cardiovascular reactivity among surgeons. JAMA 272:882–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanderson P, Tosh N, Philp S, Rudie J, Watson MO, Russell WJ (2005) The effects of ambient music on simulated anaesthesia monitoring. Anaesthesia 60:1073–1078PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, Oertli D (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A (2004) Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery 136:25–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hines M, O’Connor J (1926) A measure of finger dexterity. J Pers Res 4:379–382Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Annett M (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis (Annett Handedness Questionnaire). Br J Psychol 61:303–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hampel R (1977) Adjektiv-Skalen zur Einschätzung der Stimmung (SES). Diagnostica 23:43–60Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17:803–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2004) The learning curve on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator: profiles and performance. Surg Endosc 18:121–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Eriksen J, Blirup D, Kristiansen VB, Funch-Jensen P, Darzi A (2006) Evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    O’Brien R, Kaiser M (1985) MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. Psychol Bull 97:316–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Miskovic
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • R. Rosenthal
    • 3
  • U. Zingg
    • 3
  • D. Oertli
    • 3
  • U. Metzger
    • 1
  • L. Jancke
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTriemli HospitalZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.LondonUK
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.Institute of NeuropsychologyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations