Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 7, pp 1690–1696

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it?

  • G. Hubens
  • L. Balliu
  • M. Ruppert
  • B. Gypen
  • T. Van Tu
  • W. Vaneerdeweg
Article

Abstract

Background

The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure (RYGBP) is in many countries the gold standard for obtaining long-lasting weight reduction and improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. However, performing this operation by standard laparoscopic techniques requires important surgical skills because of the anastomoses involved. The da Vinci surgical robot system with its enhanced degrees of freedom in motion and three-dimensional vision is designed to overcome the difficulties encountered in traditional laparoscopic surgery with suturing and delicate tissue handling.

Methods

For this study, 45 patients (9 men) with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 44.2 (range, 35.1–55.4) underwent RYGBP with the aid of the da Vinci robot system. They were compared with 45 consecutive patients with a mean BMI of 43.9 (range, 35.1–56.2) who underwent a laparoscopic RYGBP by the same surgeon during the same period.

Results

Overall, the total operating time was shorter for the laparoscopic cases (127 vs 212 min; p < 0.05). However, the last 10 robotic cases were performed in the same time span as the laparoscopic cases (136 vs 127 min). The total robotic setup time remained constant at about 30 min. There were no differences in postoperative complications between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leakage or stenosis. In the robotic group, more conversions to open surgery were noted. Early in the study, four patients (9%) had to undergo conversion to standard laparoscopic techniques due to inadequate setup of the robotic arms. Five patients (11%), however, had to undergo conversion to open surgery because of intestinal laceration during manipulation of the intestines with the robotic instruments. The costs were higher for robotic surgery than for standard laparoscopic RYGBP, mainly because of the extra equipment used, such as ultrasonic devices.

Conclusion

The RYGBP procedure can be performed safely with the da Vinci robot after a learning curve of about 35 cases. At this writing, however, it is not clear whether the da Vinci system offers a real advantage over standard laparoscopic techniques.

Keywords

Bariatric Human Obesity Robotic Technical 

References

  1. 1.
    Steinbrook R (2004) Surgery for severe obesity. New Eng J Med 350:1075–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schauer P (2005) Gastric bypass for severe obesity: approaches and outcomes. Surg Obes Rel Dis 1:297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wittgrove AC, Clark GW (1999) Laparoscopic gastric bypass: a five-year prospective study of 500 patients followed from 3–60 months. Obes Surg 9:123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Hammad G, Gourash W (2003) The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in 100 cases. Surg Endosc 17:212–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliak D, Ballantyne GH, Weber P, Wasielewski A, Davies RJ, Schmidt HJ (2003) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: defining the learning curve. Surg Endosc 17:405–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Champion JK, Hunt T, DeLisle N (1999) Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbid obesity. Obes Surg 9:123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Higa K, Ho T, Boone K (2001) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technique and 3-year follow-up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11:377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Higa K, Boone K (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy technique. In: Inabnet W, Demaria E, Ikkramuddin S (eds) Laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia pp 107–115Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobsen G, Berger R, Horgan S (2003) The role of robotic surgery in morbid obesity. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13:279–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muhlmann G, Klaus A, Kirchmayr W, Wykypiel H, Unger A, Holler E, Nehoda H, Aigner F, Weiss HG (2003) Da Vinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting? Obes Surg 13:848–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ali MR, Bhaskerrao B, Wolfe BM (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 19:468–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohr C, Nadzam G, Curet M ( 2005) Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arch Surg 140:779–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moser F, Horgan S (2004) Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J Surg 188:38S–44SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olbers T, Lonroth H, Fagevik-Olsen M, Lundell L (2003) Laparoscopic gastric bypass: development of technique, respiratory function, and long-term outcome. Obes Surg 13:364–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tichansky D, DeMaria E (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: linear stapled technique In: Inabnet W, Demaria E, Ikkramuddin S (eds) Laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia pp 102–105Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De La Torre R, Scott JS (2005) Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y divided gastric bypass with transgastric anvil placement. In: Inabnet W, Demaria E, Ikkramuddin S (eds) Laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia pp 116–122Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hubens G, Coveliers J, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W (2003) A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:1595–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17:574–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nio D, Bemelman W, Boer K, Dunker M, Gouma D, Gulik T (2002) Efficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16:412–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Stranar F, Cecconi S, Bakstracci T, Caravaglios C (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Hubens
    • 1
  • L. Balliu
    • 1
  • M. Ruppert
    • 1
  • B. Gypen
    • 1
  • T. Van Tu
    • 1
  • W. Vaneerdeweg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital AntwerpenAntwerpenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations