Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1440–1444

Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgery simulator (Lap Mentor®)

Evaluation of surgical skill with a virtual laparoscopic training simulator
  • Aimin Zhang
  • Michael Hünerbein
  • Yiyang Dai
  • Peter M. Schlag
  • Siegfried Beller
Article

Abstract

Background

Before surgical simulators can be implemented for assessment of surgical training, their construct validity should be assessed.

Methods

Nine novices (NOV), nine medical students (MS), and nine residents (RES) underwent a laparoscopic skills training on the virtual reality (VR) simulator Lap Mentor®. Assessment of laparoscopic skill was based on parameters measured by the computer system before and after training.

Results

Significant difference existed between RES and NOV at seven of nine tasks before training on the VR simulator. After the training in some tasks significant differences were observed between the experienced group (RES) and the nonexperienced groups (MS and NOV) or between medical groups (RES and MS) and nonmedical group (NOV).

Conclusions

Performance parameters of the Lap-Mentor® can be used to distinguish between subjects with varying laparoscopic experience.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Virtual reality Simulation Training Evaluation 

References

  1. 1.
    Hunter JG, Sackier JM, Berci G (1994) Training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Quantifying the learning curve. Surg Endosc 8:28–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Macmillan AI, Cuschieri A (1999) Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg 177:274–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madan AK, Frantzides CT (2007) Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic trainers for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition. Surg Endosc 21:209–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosenthal R, Gantert WA, Scheidegger D, et al. (2006) Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee’s talent in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 20:1286–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, et al. (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182:137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, et al. (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP, Eriksen JR, et al. (2006) An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons. Ann Surg 244:310–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krummel TM (1998) Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution. Ann Surg 228:635–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Sickle KR, Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, et al. (2007) Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study. Surg Endosc 21:5–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McDougall EM, Corica FA, Boker JR, et al. (2006) Construct validity testing of a laparoscopic surgical simulator. J Am Coll Surg 202:779–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, et al. (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16:1746–1752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Woodrum DT, Andreatta PB, Yellamanchilli RK, et al. (2006) Construct validity of the LapSim laparoscopic surgical simulator. Am J Surg 191:28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallagher AG, Richie K, McClure N, et al. (2001) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality. World J Surg 25:1478–1483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aimin Zhang
    • 1
  • Michael Hünerbein
    • 1
  • Yiyang Dai
    • 1
  • Peter M. Schlag
    • 1
  • Siegfried Beller
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery and Surgical OncologyCharite Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Klinik für Chirurgie und Chirurgische OnkologieCharitè Campus BuchBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations