Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1211–1213 | Cite as

The “invisible cholecystectomy”: A transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar

  • Miguel A. CuestaEmail author
  • Frits Berends
  • Alexander A. F. A. Veenhof



Looking to further reduce the operative trauma of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we developed, in patients with no history of cholecystitis and a normal BMI, a scarless operation through the umbilicus. The operative technique, along with the results of the first 10 patients operated in this way, are fully described.


10 female patients underwent transumbilical scarless laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Through the umbilicus, two trocars of 5 mm were introduced parallel to another with a bridge of fascia between them (one for the 5-mm laparoscope and the other for the grasper). With the help of one 1-mm Kirschner wire, introduced at the subcostal line and bent with a special designed device, the gallbladder was pulled up and the triangle of Callot was dissected free, clipped, cut, and the gallbladder was subsequently resected. Finally the gallbladder was taken out through the umbilicus and the umbilicus reconstructed.


10 female patients, mean age 36 years (range: 31–49), mean body mass index (BMI) 23 (range: 20–26), after one attack (six patients) or a second attack (four patients) and cholelithiasis confirmed by ultrasonography with no suspicion of inflammation were included in this preliminary study. Mean operative time was 70 minutes (range: 65–85) with no conversions; hospital stay was less than 24 hours with no complications.


Looking to reduce operative trauma and improve the cosmetic result following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a transumbilical operative technique has been developed. Results of the operative procedure in a selected group of patients are encouraging with no signs of inflammation and normal BMI. The umbilicus can be developed as a natural port for performing various operative procedures with the help of the traction produced by thin Kirschner wires.


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Minimally invasive Scarless cholecystectomy 


  1. 1.
    McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J, Onders RP, Chak A, Faulx A, Chen VK, Ponsky J (2006) A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Inn 13:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G (2000) Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:32–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarli S, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2003) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 90:1345–1348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Delvaux G, Devroey P, De Waele B, Willems G (1995) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:80–81Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsin DA, Sequeria RJ, Giannikas G (2003) Culdolaparoscopic cholecystectomy during vaginal hysterectomy. JSCS 7:171–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel A. Cuesta
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Frits Berends
    • 2
  • Alexander A. F. A. Veenhof
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryVrije Universiteit Medical CentreAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Rijnstate HospitalArnhemThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryVUMCAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations