Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 2317–2321 | Cite as

Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy

  • B. TopalEmail author
  • R. Aerts
  • F. Penninckx



Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is as safe and efficient as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in achieving bile duct clearance from stones. No clear guidelines are available on LCBDE with respect to indications for trans-cystic approach versus choledochotomy, or regarding when to use either flexible choledochoscopy (FCD) or intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) guidance.


From January 2001 until November 2006, 113 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) and gallbladder in situ were enrolled in a prospective non-randomized study to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with LCBDE on an intention-to-treat basis. Twenty-three patients were aged 80 years or older with severe comorbidity. Preoperative ERCP with attempted stone clearance was performed in 24 patients. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was attempted for CBDS in the presence of acute cholecystitis in 24 patients. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed via the trans-cystic approach in 83 patients and via choledochotomy in 30 patients. Flexible choledochoscopy was used in 79 patients and IOC guidance in 34 patients.


No mortality occurred. Postoperative complications were encountered in nine patients. Laparoscopic stone clearance of the bile duct was successful in 91.8% of the patients. Median length of hospital stay (LOS) was two days (range, 0 to 24 days) after trans-cystic LCBDE and six days (range, 2 to 34 days) after stone clearance via choledochotomy (p < 0.0001). Choledochotomy was performed for CBDS measuring an average of 11.5 mm (range, 5 to 30 mm) in diameter while trans-cystic LCBDE was successful for stones measuring an average of 5 mm (range, 2 to 14 mm) (p < 0.0001). Mean duration of surgery was 75 minutes (range, 30 to 180 minutes) when FCD was used, and 107 minutes (range, 45 to 240 minutes) in patients undergoing LCBDE under IOC guidance (p < 0.0001).


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and LCBDE with stone extraction can be performed with high efficiency, minimal morbidity and without mortality. A trans-cystic approach is feasible in most patients, whereas choledochotomy should be restricted to large bile duct stones that cannot be extracted through the cystic duct. The use of flexible choledochoscopy is preferable to IOC guidance.


Laparoscopy Bile duct stone Choledochoscopy 


  1. 1.
    Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, Nagan RF (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:10–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berci G, Morgenstern L (1994) Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones. A multi-institutional SAGES study. Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 8:1168–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bingener J, Schwesinger WH (2006) Management of common bile duct stones in a rural area of the United States. Surg Endosc 20:577–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Britton J, Bickerstaff KI, Savage A (1995) Benign diseases of the biliary tract. In: Oxford Textbook of Surgery on CD, Oxford University Press and Electronic Publishing BV. Rotterdam Portions, Iterated Systems:1209–1239Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carr-Locke DL (1990) Acute gallstone pancreatitis and endoscopic therapy. Review. Endoscopy 22:180–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clayton ESJ, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93:1185–1191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335:909–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F, De Bernardin M, Ederle A, Fina P, Fratton A (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin IJ, Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration. A methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 228:29–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19(2):CD003327Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nathanson LK, O’Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, Kendall BJ, Kerlin P, Devereux BM (2005) Postoperative ERCP versus Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi. A randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:188–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peganini AM, Lezoche E (1998) Follow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 12:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poulose BK, Arbogast PG, Holzman MD (2006) National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores. Surg Endosc 20:186–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351:159–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sgourakis G, Karaliotas K (2002) Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study. Minerva Chir 57:467–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 199:91–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoker ME (1995) Common bile duct exploration in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 130:265–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaira D, D’Anna L, Ainley C, Dowsett J, Williams S, Baillie J, Caims S, Croker J, Salmon P, Cotton P, et al. (1989) Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 2(8660):431–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44:118–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations