Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 183–187 | Cite as

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases

  • K.-M. Chiu
  • C.-L. Chen
  • S.-H. ChuEmail author
  • T.-Y. Lin
Article

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein is a relatively new technique developed to minimize the wound and postoperative complications. This technique has gained patients’ acceptance and become popular in cardiac surgical practices. Because most centers have limited experience with this approach, the authors summarize the clinical profiles of patients undergoing endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH).

Methods

Between March 2001 and August 2006, 1,348 patients (945 men and 403 women) with a mean age of 67.2 years (range, 28–89 years) underwent EVH of saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery, peripheral artery reconstruction, and miscellaneous conditions. The EVH technique was performed using the Vasoview system (Guidant, Menlo Park, CA, USA) under the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 98.6% of the cases. Two saphenous veins were discarded because of obvious vein injury. The mean harvest time was 45 min: 68 min for the first 50 cases and 23 min for the last 200 cases. Nearly all the patients (98%) had saphenous vein harvested only from the thighs, whereas only 1.5% of the patients had saphenous vein harvested from the legs. Postoperative wound complications were experienced by 61 patients including 25 tract hematomas, 19 wound dehiscences or poor healing, 16 wound infections, and 1 overlying skin necrosis. Overall, 13 subsequent revisions were required for these complications. Detectable air embolisms occurred for 143 patients and numbness in the saphenous nerve territory for 169 patients.

Conclusion

The findings showed EVH of saphenous vein to be a valid alternative to open saphenectomy, providing excellent surgical results. Therefore, EVH should be considered as the standard of care for saphenous vein harvest.

Keywords

Coronary artery bypass Endoscopic harvest Saphenous vein 

References

  1. 1.
    Seabolt PB, Reardon MJ (2003) Endoscopic vein harvesting in cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 18:444–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bitondo JM, Daggett WM, Torchiana DF, Akins CW, Hilgenberg AD, Vlahakes GJ, Madsen JC, MacGillivray TE, Agnihotri AK (2002) Endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest: a comparison of postoperative wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg 73:523–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE (2001) Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schurr UP, Lachat ML, Reuthebuch O, Kadner A, Mader M, Seiffert B, Hoerstrup SP, Zünd G, Genoni M, Turina MI (2002) Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for CABG: a randomized, prospective trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50:160–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felisky CD, Paull DL, Hill ME, Hall RA, Ditkoff M, Campbell WG, Guyton SW (2002) Endoscopic greater saphenous vein harvesting reduces the morbidity of coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Surg 183:576–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB (2003) Influence of endoscopic versus traditional saphenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 6:E143–E145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Griffith GL, Fitzgerald EB, Isch JH, Abraham S, Shaar CJ (2000) Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum 3:325–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffith GL, Allen KB, Waller BF, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, Schier JJ, Shaar CJ (2000) Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: a histologic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 69:520–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiaii B, Moon BC, Massel D, Langlois Y, Austin TW, Willoughby A, Guiraudon C, Howard CR, Guo LR (2002) A prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123:204–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, Mansukhani P, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Kochamba GS, Grunkemeier G, Khonsari S (2005) Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:496–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodrigus IE, Stockman B, Amsel BJ, Moulijn AC (2001) Should we use video-assisted endoscopic vein harvesting as a standard technique? Heart Surg Forum 4:53–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL, Hunnicutt C, Williams M, Liu L, Wood RE (2001) Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 182:716–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin TY, Chiu KM, Wang MJ, Chu SH (2003) Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:2011–2015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chiu KM, Lin TY, Wang MJ, Chu SJ (2006) Reduction of carbon dioxide embolism for endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting. Ann Thorac Surg 81:1697–1699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohn JD, Korver KF (2005) Optimizing saphenous vein site selection using intraoperative venous duplex ultrasound scanning. Ann Thorac Surg 79:2013–2017PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alexander MJ, Perna J (2005) Endoscopic saphenous vein graft harvest for extracranial–intracranial bypass procedures. Surg Neurol 63:565–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Erdoes LS, Milner TP (2005) Encouraging results with endoscopic vein harvest for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 42:442–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiovascular SurgeryFar-Eastern Memorial HospitalPan-ChiaoTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaFar-Eastern Memorial HospitalPan-ChiaoTaiwan

Personalised recommendations