Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 674–678 | Cite as

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy for right kidneys: Experience in a German community hospital

  • S. Saad
  • A. Paul
  • J. Treckmann
  • M. Nagelschmidt
  • M. Heiss
  • W. Arns
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has become the new gold standard for kidney procurement in many high-volume transplant centres worldwide, but it is often limited to left-sided donor kidneys. Concerns about adequate anatomical renal vessel length and sufficient surgical exposure are the main obstacles to the use of the laparoscopic approach for right kidney live donors as well.

Material and methods

From 1998 to 2006 we performed laparoscopic kidney procurement in 73 live kidney donors on an intention-to-treat basis, harvesting a total of 48 left (LKG) and 25 right kidneys (RKG) for transplantation. We compared these two groups with respect to operating time, conversion rate, complications, hospital stay, and recipient outcome.

Results

There were no differences in outcome of donor patients after left (D-LKG) or right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (D-RKG). Operating time was 160 min in D-RKG versus 164 min in D-LKG. Warm ischemia was below 150 s in both groups. Hospital stay was 7.0 (D-RKG) versus 6.7 days (D-LKG). Negative events on the donor site were one temporary nerve irritation in each group and one postoperative retroperitoneal hematoma in the left kidney group. Reasons to convert to open nephrectomy were bleeding in two patients in the left kidney group and adhesions in one patient in the right kidney group. The outcome of the recipients after left (R-LKG) or right kidney (R-RKG) transplantation was similar. One kidney was lost due to renal vein thrombosis (R-LKG). Postoperative ureter complications occurred in one patient of each group. One patient of the R-RKG and two patients of the R-LKG required lymphocele fenestration. All other kidney transplants worked without problems.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is a safe procedure and has been established as the method of choice for live kidney donation in our clinic. Laparoscopic procurement of right and left kidneys can be performed with comparable quality and outcome for donors and recipients.

Keywords

Live kidney donation Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy Kidney transplantation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Baron PW, Baldwin DD, Hadley HR, Ojogho ON, Ruckle HC, et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and results in increased kidney donation. Am Surg 70:901–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bemelman WA, van Doorn RC, de Wit LT, Kox C, Surachno J, et al. (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ascending the learning curve. Surg Endosc 15:442–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A, et al. (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:983–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 19:102–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, Goel M, Flechner SM, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65:862–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation (2006) (www.dso.de)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    El-Galley R, Hood N, Young CJ, Deierhoi M, Urban DA (2004) Donor nephrectomy: A comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 171:40–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, et al. (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226:483–489; discussion 489–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I, et al. (2003) [Laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy. Technique and results]. Urologe A 42:218–224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2003) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 90:1323–1332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kok NF, Alwayn IP, Lind MY, Tran KT, Weimar W, et al. (2006) Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 81:881–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, et al. (2006) Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. Bmj 333:221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lai IR, Tsai MK, Lee PH (2004) Hand-assisted versus total laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:749–753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewis GR, Brook NR, Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, et al. (2004) A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 17:589–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE (2001) Should the indications for laparascopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindiction to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 71:660–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melcher ML, Carter JT, Posselt A, Duh QY, Stoller M, et al. (2005) More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch Surg 140:835–839; discussion 839–840PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyer F, Santos LS, Varaschin AE, Patriani AH, Pimpao BF (2005) Hand-assisted right laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donor. Int Braz J Urol 31:17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC, Schweitzer E, Wiland A, et al. (1999) A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 67:722–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, et al. (2003) Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169:2018–2021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78:1665–1669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, Drehmer I, Jurgowski W, et al. (2001) Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A 40:485–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, et al. (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Chavin KD, Montgomery R (1998) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 65:1657–1658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Schulam PG, Bender JS, Magnuson TH, et al. (1997) Comparison of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy versus the standard open approach. Transplant Proc 29:138–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, et al. (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240:358–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Saad
    • 1
  • A. Paul
    • 2
  • J. Treckmann
    • 2
  • M. Nagelschmidt
    • 3
  • M. Heiss
    • 1
  • W. Arns
    • 4
  1. 1.Department for Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation SurgeryClinic Cologne-MerheimCologneGermany
  2. 2.Department of General and Transplantation SurgeryUniversity EssenCologneGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Experimental MedicineUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  4. 4.Department of Internal Medicine IClinic Cologne-MerheimCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations