Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 1680–1680 | Cite as

The man—machine interface, a paradox of technology. Is the black box (BB) concept an angel or a demon?

Letter to the Editor


  1. 1.
    Verdaasdonk EG, Stassen LP, van der Elst M, Karsten TM, Dankelman J (2007) Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery. An observational study. Surg Endosc 21(2):275–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yavuz Y, Skogas JG, Gulluoglu MG, Lango T, Marvik R (2006) Are cold light sources really cold? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16(5):370–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook RI (2003) Seeing is believing. Ann Surg 237(4):472–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Larson GM (2006) Laparoscopic biliary tract injury: what are the limits of prevention? Surg Endosc 20:1635–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agarwal BB, Gupta M, Agarwal S, Mahajan KC (2007) Anatomical footprint for safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy without using any energy source - a modified technique. Surg Endosc SEND-06-0784.R1 (ahead of publication)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Witkowski P, Ermanno E, Trabucco (2007) Is there an increased risk of the vas deferens occlusion after mesh inguinal hernioplasty and what can we do about it? Ann Surg 245:154–155Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaafarani HMA, Itani KMF (2005) The surgeon’s ego and reporting of clinical failure. Br J Surg 92:122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin RCG, Murray MD, Brennan F, Jaques DP (2002) Quality of Complication Reporting in the Surgical Literature Ann Surg 235(6):803–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swanstrom LL (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repairs. Surg Clin N Am 80(4) 1341–1351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuschieri A (2006) Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice. Ann Surg 244(5) 642–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eypasch E, Lefering R, Kum CK, Troidl H (1995) Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: a statistical reminder. BMJ 311:619–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russell T (2006) Safety and quality improvement in surgical practice. Ann Surg 244(5):653–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lill MM, Wilkinson TJ (2005) Judging a book by its cover: descriptive survey of patients’ preferences for doctors’ appearance and mode of address. BMJ 331:1524–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klass D (2007) Assessing doctors at work — Progress and challenges. N Engl J Med 356(4):414–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hockerstedt K (2006) Surgeons’ self-esteem: A change from too high to too low? Ann Surg 244(6):841–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Consultant laparoscopic surgeonSir Ganga Ram HospitalNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Professor of AnatomyLady Harding Medical CollegeNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations