Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 1487–1491 | Cite as

Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using a nonslit mesh technique

  • G. J. Mancini
  • D. A. McCluskyIII
  • L. Khaitan
  • E. A. Goldenberg
  • B. T. Heniford
  • Y. W. Novitsky
  • A. E. Park
  • S. Kavic
  • K. A. LeBlanc
  • M. J. Elieson
  • G. R. Voeller
  • B. J. RamshawEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

The management of parastomal hernia is associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates (20–70%). This study investigated a novel laparoscopic approach and evaluated its outcomes.

Methods

A consecutive multi-institutional series of patients undergoing parastomal hernia repair between 2001 and 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Laparoscopy was used with modification of the open Sugarbaker technique. A nonslit expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh was placed to provide 5-cm overlay coverage of the stoma and defect. Transfascial sutures secured the mesh, allowing the stoma to exit from the lateral edge. Five advanced laparoscopic surgeons performed all the procedures. The primary outcome measure was hernia recurrence.

Results

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 60 years and a body mass index of 29 kg/m2 underwent surgery. Six of these patients had undergone previous mesh stoma revisions. The mean size of the hernia defect was 64 cm2, and the mean size of the mesh was 365 cm2. There were no conversions to open surgery. The overall postoperative morbidity was 23%, and the mean hospital length of stay was 3.3 days. One patient died of pulmonary complications; one patient had a trocar-site infection; and one patient had a mesh infection requiring mesh removal. During a median follow-up period of 19 months (range, 2–38 months), 4% (1/25) of the patients experienced recurrence.

Conclusion

On the basis of this large case series, the laparoscopic nonslit mesh technique for the repair of parastomal hernias seems to be a promising approach for the reduction of hernia recurrence in experienced hands.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Parastomal herniation Paraostomy complications Surgical technique 

References

  1. 1.
    Carne P, Robertson G, Frizelle F (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leong A, Londono-Schimmer E, Phillips R (1994) Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg 81:727–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Londono-Schimmer E, Leong A, Phillips R (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bickel A, Shinkarevsky E, Eitan A (1999) Laparoscopic repair of paracolostomy hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 9:353–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deol Z, Shayani V (2003) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Arch Surg 138:203–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunet F, Pfister C, Denis R, Pascal T, Khalil H, Peillon C (2002) Laparoscopic management of parastomal herniation in transileal urinary diversion. J Urol 167:236–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gould J, Ellison E (2003) Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:51–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hansson B, Nieuwenhoven Ev, Bleichrodt R (2003) Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia. Surg Endosc 17:1789–1791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    LeBlanc K, Bellanger D (2002) Laparoscopic repair of paraostomy hernias: early results. J Am Coll Surg 194:232–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pekmezci S, Memisoglu K, Karahasanoglu T, Alemdaroglu K (2002) Laparoscopic giant parastomal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh. Tech Coloproctol 6:187–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Porcheron J, Payan B, Balique J (1998) Mesh repair of paracolostomy hernia by laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 12:1281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Votik A (2000) Simple technique for laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia repair. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1451–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kozlowski P, Wang P, Winfield HN (2001) Laparoscopic repair of incisional and parastomal hernias after major genitourinary or abdominal surgery. J Endourol 15:175–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sugarbaker P (1985) Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias. Ann Surg 201:344–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramshaw B, Esartia P, Schwab J, Manson E, Wilson R, Duncan T, Miller J, Lucas GW, Promes J (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorraphy. Am Surg 65:827–831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heniford B, Park A, Ramshaw B, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 238:391–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kossovsky N, Freiman C, Howarth D (2001) Biomaterials pathology. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament J, Phillips E (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer-Verlag, New York pp 221–234Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aldridge A, Simson J (2001) Erosion and perforation of colon by synthetic mesh in a recurrent paracolostomy hernia. Hernia 5:110–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morris-Stiff G, Hughes L (1998) The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:184–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Voeller G (2001) Repair of incisional hernias and midline defects. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament J, Phillips E (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer-Verlag, New York 516–526Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Law N, Ellis H (1988) Adhesion formation and peritoneal healing on prosthetic materials. Clin Mater 3:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sahin M, Hasandglu A, Erbilen M (1995) Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study). Acta Chir Hung 96:291–295Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murphy J, Freeman J, Dionne P (1989) Comparison of Marlex and Gore-Tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Can J Surg 32:244–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Law N (2001) Expanded polytetrafluorethylene. In: Bendavid R, Abrahamson J, Arregui M, Flament J, Phillips E (eds) Abdominal wall hernias: principles and management. Springer-Verlag, New York 279–285Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bujan J, Contreras L, Martin AC-S, Bellon J (1997) The behaviour of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring of abdominal wall defects. Histol Histopathol 12:683–690PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Mancini
    • 1
  • D. A. McCluskyIII
    • 2
  • L. Khaitan
    • 2
  • E. A. Goldenberg
    • 2
  • B. T. Heniford
    • 3
  • Y. W. Novitsky
    • 3
  • A. E. Park
    • 4
  • S. Kavic
    • 4
  • K. A. LeBlanc
    • 5
  • M. J. Elieson
    • 5
  • G. R. Voeller
    • 6
  • B. J. Ramshaw
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.MC410–Department of SurgeryUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryUniversity of MarylandBaltimoreUSA
  5. 5.Minimally Invasive Surgery InstituteBaton RougeUSA
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryUniversity of TennesseeMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations