Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 86–90 | Cite as

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: When tissue is the issue

  • Ian Storch
  • Mubashir Shah
  • R. Thurer
  • Elio Donna
  • A. Ribeiro



Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) has a high accuracy in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. The use of a core biopsy needle for EUS guided biopsy (EUS TCB) may further improve the yield of EUS. The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety of EUS TCB in thoracic lesions and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TCB with FNA and FNA + TCB.


A single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent EUS-FNA and TCB. A cytopathologist was not present during the procedure. EUS FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB diagnostic accuracy were compared.


A total of 48 patients were included. The lesions sampled included 41 lymph nodes (six aorto-pulmonary window, 32 subcarinal, two right paratracheal, one paraesophageal ATS station 8), five lung masses, and two esophageal masses. Twenty-nine patients had malignant disease and 19 had benign disorders. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB was 79%, 79% and 98% respectively (p = 0.007). TCB changed the diagnosis in nine cases missed by FNA. EUS TCB was better than FNA for benign diseases (89% vs. 63%, p = 0.04). All eight patients with a prior failed biopsy had a correct diagnosis established by EUS. No patient required mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy after EUS.


The combination of TCB and FNA is superior to FNA alone. EUS-guided TCB should be considered in patients with benign disorders of the mediastinum when other modalities fail to yield a diagnosis.


Ultrasonography Endoscopy 


  1. 1.
    Raj M, Chen RY. (2006) Interventional applications of endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21(2):348–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Bobrowski C, et al. (2000) Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA-based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 95(9):2278–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Annema JT, Veselic M, Rabe KF. (2005) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J 25(3):405–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. (2003) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol 120(3):351–67Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiersema MJ, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema LM. (2001) Evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy with endoscopic US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 219:252–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larsen SS, Krasnik M, Vilmann P, Pedersen JH, Faurschou P, Folke K. (2002) Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy of mediastinal lesions has a major impact on patient management. Thorax 57:98–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fickling W, Wallace MB. (2002) EUS in lung cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 56(4 suppl):S18–S21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wildi SM, Judson MA, Fraig M, et al. (2000) Is endosonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for sarcoidosis as good as we think? Thorax 59(9):794–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R, et al. (2006) Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 64(4):505–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Storch I, Jorda M, Ribeiro A. (2005) EUS-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of pulmonary lymphoma in a patient with an esophagopulmonary fistula. Gastrointest Endosc 61(7):904–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larghi A, Rodriguez-Wulff E, Noffsinger A. (2006) Dye CERecurrent malignant thymoma diagnosed by EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 63(6):859–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN, Deheragoda M, Pereira SP. (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound- guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology 17(1):27–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, et al. (2006) Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 36(5):397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ. (2003) Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 57:101–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    AJCC cancer staging manual (1997) American Joint Committee on Cancer. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott-Raven, 720–726Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emery SC, Savides TJ, Behling CA. (2004) Utility of immediate evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes. Acta Cytol 48(5):630–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tournoy KG, Praet MM, Van Maele G, Van Meerbeeck JP. (2005) Esophageal Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration with an on-site cytopathologist: high accuracy for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Chest 128:3004–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gines A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, Pochron NL, Rajan E, Levy MJ. (2006) Prospective study of a trucut needle performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointes Endosc 62:602–4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Storch
    • 1
  • Mubashir Shah
    • 1
  • R. Thurer
    • 3
  • Elio Donna
    • 2
  • A. Ribeiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterMiller School of Medicine, University of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pulmonary, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterMiller School of Medicine, University of MiamiMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Division of Thoracic Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer CenterMiller School of Medicine, University of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations