Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 2163–2165 | Cite as

Duhamel procedure: a comparative retrospective study between an open and a laparoscopic technique

  • D. Vieira TravassosEmail author
  • N. M. A. Bax
  • D. C. Van der Zee
Article

Abstract

Background

Few studies are available comparing open with laparoscopic treatment of Hirschsprung’s disease. This study compares a laparoscopic series of 30 patients with a historical open series of 25 patients.

Methods

The charts of all patients having had a Duhamel procedure in the period from June 1987 through July 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Open procedures were performed until March 1994. Patients with extended aganglionosis, pre-Duhamel ostomy, or syndrome were excluded from the study. End points were intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, time to first feeding, hospital stay, and outcome at follow-up such as stenosis, enterocolitis, constipation, fecal incontinence, and enuresis.

Results

Twenty-five patients had an open Duhamel (OD) and 30 had a laparoscopic one (LD). There were no differences in patient characteristics and there were no intraoperative complications in either group. Time to first oral feeds was significantly longer in the OD group as was the duration of hospital stay. No significant differences at follow-up were observed but there was a tendency for a higher enterocolitis rate in the LD group. In contrast, the adhesive obstruction and enuresis rates were higher in the OD group. Cosmetic results were superior in the LD group.

Conclusions

Except for a significantly shorter hospital stay and shorter time to first oral feeds in favor of LD, no significant differences could be observed. The cosmetic result was not an end point but there was no doubt that it was better in the LD group. Although not statistically significant different, there were no adhesive bowel obstructions in the LD group compared with 3 of 25 in the OD group. Fecal incontinence was not encountered in either group.

Keywords

Aganglionosis Hirschsprung Duhamel Laparoscopy Child 

References

  1. 1.
    Langer JC, Fitzgerald PG, Winthrop AL, Srinathan SK, Foglia RP, Skinner MA, Ternberg JL, Lau GY (1996) One-stage versus two-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease in the first year of life. J Pediatr Surg 31: 33–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Langer JC, Seifert M, Minkes RK (2000) One-stage Soave pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease: A comparison of the transanal and open approaches. J Pediatr Surg 35: 820–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Zee DC, Bax NMA, ter Gunne AJP, Rovekamp MH (1993) Use of EndoGIA stapling device in Duhamel-Martin procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease. Pediatr Surg Int 8: 447–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bax NMA, van der Zee DC (1995) Laparoscopic removal of aganglionic bowel using the Duhamel-Martin method in 5 consecutive infants. Pediatr Surg Int 10:226–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Georgeson KE, Robertson DJ (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted approaches for the definitive surgery for Hirschsprung’s disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 13: 256–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith BM, Steiner RB, Lobe TE (1994) Laparoscopic Duhamel pull-through procedure for Hirschsprung’s disease in childhood. J Laparoendosc Surg 4: 273–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de la Torre L, Ortega A (2000) Transanal versus open endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung’s disease. J Pediatr Surg 35: 1630–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Antao B, Radhwan T, Samuel M, Keily E (2005) Short-pouch and low-anastomosis Duhamel procedure results in better fecal control and normal defecation pattern. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1791–1796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Vieira Travassos
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. M. A. Bax
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. C. Van der Zee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryWilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric SurgerySophia Children’s Hospital, Erasmus Medical CentreRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations