Ergonomics with the use of curved versus straight laparoscopic graspers during rectosigmoid resection: results of a multiprofile comparative study
- First Online:
A detailed ergonomic comparison of motions and muscular activity in the left upper extremity using a laparoscopic straight or curved grasper in rectosigmoid resection is presented.
The study had two parts: experimental and clinical. In the experiment part, 30 laparoscopic sigmoid resections were performed under animal organ phantom conditions. The operations were divided into three groups according to instrument and trocar position. Group 1 (n = 10) underwent operations performed with a curved grasper in the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the left-hand curved grasper placed in the right flank and the right hand instrument in the right lower quadrant. In group 2 (n = 10), straight forceps were used in the excentral trocar position. Group 3 (n = 10) underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection performed with a straight grasper in the central position (in relation to the telescope trocar), with the instruments placed at both sides of the lower abdomen. To measure ergonomic aspects during rectosigmoid resection, several overview video cameras, surface electromyography (EMG), an ultrasound tracking system (UTS), and a questionnaire were used. In the clinical part of the study, laparoscopic rectosigmoid resections (n = 5) were performed using a curved instrument in the excentral trocar position. The surgeon’s left-hand movement and body posture were recorded for further analysis.
The curved grasper required the fewest contractions (group 1) of the measured muscles. A comparison of the UTS analysis in the experimental part of the study and the video analysis in the clinical part showed economy of movements in group 1. According to subjective estimation, both physical activity and mental stress remain at the lowest level when the excentral trocar position is used (groups 1 and 2).
The combination of the curved grasper and the excentral trocar position (in relation to the telescope trocar) is, according to our examinations, the best ergonomic adjustment for laparoscopic rectosigmoid surgery.
KeywordsErgonomics Laparoscopic graspers Sigmoid resection
- 3.Gerber S (1998) A comparative study of forces involved with manipulation of standard and laparoscopic surgical instruments [thesis]. Biomedical Engineering Program, California State University Sacramento, CA, 75 ppGoogle Scholar
- 10.Delagi EF, Iazzetty J, Perotto A, Morrison D (1980) Anatomic guide for the electromyographer. Charles S. Thomas, Springfield, ILGoogle Scholar
- 11.Konrad K (2005) The ABC of EMG: a practical introduction to kinesiological electromyographyGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1309–1315Google Scholar
- 19.Koeckerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Scheidbach H, Scheuerlein H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Zornig C, Koehler L, Baerlehner E, Kuthe A, Szinicz G, Richter HA, Hohenberger W, Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (1999) Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis: results of a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 13: 567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Rose J, Konradt J, Gross E, Bärlehner E, Pross M, Schmidt U, Köckerling F, Lippert H (2004) Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1883–1888PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hoolhorst FWB (2005) Design of a handle for curved instruments [master thesis]. Section for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Clinic of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery. Tuebingen, Germany, 107 ppGoogle Scholar
- 24.Johnsson B (1978) Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med 6: 69–74Google Scholar