Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1806–1809 | Cite as

Colonoscopy in the very elderly: a review of 157 cases

  • Marc Zerey
  • B. Lauren Paton
  • Philip D. Khan
  • Amy E. Lincourt
  • Kent W. Kercher
  • Frederick L. Greene
  • B. Todd Heniford
Article

Abstract

Background

Colonoscopy is currently the best diagnostic modality for evaluating colonic diseases but studies of its use in the very elderly are limited.

Methods

A single-institution review of all patients aged 85 years or older who underwent colonoscopy from June 2003 to June 2005 was performed. Parameters evaluated included indications for colonoscopy, findings, ability to perform a complete colonoscopy, and immediate and delayed (≤21 days) complications.

Results

A total of 157 patients aged 85 years or older (median = 87, range = 85–99) underwent colonoscopy during the two-year period. The cecal intubation rate was 90%. Number of cancers detected/indications for colonoscopy include gross or occult bleeding per rectum, 3/51 (5.9%); abnormal physical exam, 1/2 (50%); abnormal abdominal computed tomography, 3/5 (60%); anemia, 1/25 (4.0%); screening, 0/14; previous history of colonic malignancy, 0/10; previous history of polyps, 0/21; change in bowel habits, 0/5; family history of colonic malignancy, 0/6; abdominal pain, 0/4; diarrhea, 0/6; fecal impaction, 0/2; unknown, 0/6. Immediate complications included hemorrhage at a polypectomy site in one patient that was controlled endoscopically, one episode of bradycardia, and one incident of atrial fibrillation. There were no delayed complications resulting from colonoscopy.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that colonoscopy can be safely and successfully performed in the very elderly. In patients with symptoms or suggestive radiographic findings, cancer was detected in 4.0%–60% of cases. No cases of cancer were discovered in those patients who were asymptomatic.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer Colonoscopy Elderly 

References

  1. 1.
    American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) (2002) Colon and Rectum. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. Springer, New York, pp 113–124Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bond JH (2006) The case for direct colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 263–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) (2006) National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2006. With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Table 27. Hyattsville, MDGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DEVCAN Software (2005) Probability of Developing or Dying of Cancer, Version 5.2. Statistical Research and Applications Branch, National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://www.srab.cancer.gov/devcan. Cited Dec 2006
  5. 5.
    Duncan JE, Sweeney WB, Trudel JL, Madoff RD, Mellgren AF (2006) Colonoscopy in the elderly: low risk, low yield in asymptomatic patients. Dis Colon Rectum 49: 646–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Inadomi JM, Sonnenberg A (2000) The impact of colorectal cancer screening on life expectancy. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 517–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ (2005) Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 10–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kung JW, Levine MS, Glick SN, Lakhani P, Rubesin SE, Laufer I (2006) Colorectal cancer: screening double-contrast barium enema examination in average-risk adults older than 50 years. Radiology 240: 725–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lagares-Garcia JA, Kurek S, Collier B, Diaz F, Schilli R, Richey J, Moore RA (2001) Colonoscopy in octogenarians and older patients. Surg Endosc 15: 262–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lieberman DA, Smith FW (1991) Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 86: 946–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 343: 162–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG (2001) One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med 345: 555–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, Snover DC, Schuman LM (2000) The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343: 1603–1607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muller AD, Sonnenberg A (1995) Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med 155: 1741–1748PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muller AD, Sonnenberg A (1995) Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 123: 904–910PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nicholson FB, Barro JL, Atkin W, Lilford R, Patnick J, Williams CB, Pignone M, Steele R, Kamm MA (2005) Review article: Population screening for colorectal cancer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22: 1069–1077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sardinha TC, Nogueras JJ, Ehrenpreis ED, Zeitman D, Estevez V, Weiss EG, Wexner SD (1999) Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a review of 428 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 14: 172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stevens T, Burke CA (2003) Colonoscopy screening in the elderly: when to stop? Am J Gastroenterol 98: 1881–1885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ure T, Dehghan K, Vernava AM 3rd, Longo WE, Andrus CA, Daniel GL (1995) Colonoscopy in the elderly. Low risk, high yield. Surg Endosc 9: 505–508Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    U.S. Census Bureau (1993) Population Projections of the United States, by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1993 to 2050, Current Population Reports, P25-1104, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    U.S. Census Bureau (2004) Estimates of the Resident Population by Selected Age Groups for the United States and for Puerto Rico, SC-EST2004-01-RES. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walsh JM, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications. JAMA 289: 1297–1302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walsh JM, Terdiman JP (2003) Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA 289: 1288–1296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wan J, Zhang ZQ, Zhu C, Wang MW, Zhao DH, Fu YH, Zhang JP, Wang YH, Wu BY (2002) Colonoscopic screening and follow-up for colorectal cancer in the elderly. World J Gastroenterol 8: 267–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T, Levin T, Woolf S, Johnson D, Kirk L, Litin S, Simmang C (2003) Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale. Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124: 544–560Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, et al. (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329: 1977–1981Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Zerey
    • 1
  • B. Lauren Paton
    • 1
  • Philip D. Khan
    • 1
  • Amy E. Lincourt
    • 1
  • Kent W. Kercher
    • 1
  • Frederick L. Greene
    • 1
  • B. Todd Heniford
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive SurgeryCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations