Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1764–1767 | Cite as

Securing the appendiceal stump with the Gea extracorporeal sliding knot during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and economical

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has become very popular. One criticism of this approach is the high cost of the disposable equipment such as the linear stapler. An alternative would be suture ligation of the appendiceal base. To prove the safety of the Gea extracorporeal sliding knot (GESK) for closure of the stump after LA, a retrospective study was conducted.

Methods

For this study, 63 LA procedures performed by one surgeon using the Gea knot (group A) were reviewed and compared with 63 LA procedures performed by two other surgeons (group B) using the linear stapler. The GESK is created with 0-prolene in the manner already described. The main variable was the presence or absence of blowout, leak, or fistula from the appendiceal stump. The secondary variables were abdominal abscess, wound infection, and need for readmission or reoperation. The results were analyzed using the appropriate statistical methods.

Results

Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, and pathologic diagnosis. No patient in group A or B experienced a colonic fistula, stump blowout, or leak. In group A, one patient experienced interloop abscesses. There were two wound infections. In group B, one patient experienced a wound infection, and another patient had a wound dehiscence of the umbilical port, which required reoperation. No statistical differences were noted between the two groups.

Conclusions

There are surgeons who routinely use sutures to secure the stump of the appendectomy. This study aimed to demonstrate that the GESK is as secure as the stapler for closure of the appendiceal stump. The GESK could be passed through a 5-mm trocar, potentially avoiding complications of a larger trocar site. The GESK seems to be an economic and safe alternative to the stapler.

Keywords

Appendectomy Appendicitis Gea Knot Laparoscopic Stump 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

For the statistical analysis, we thank Patricia Atkins, RN, MS, CSSBB, Director, Six Sigma Initiatives, Clinical Effectiveness Department, Sharp Health Care.

References

  1. 1.
    Beldi G, Muggli K, Helbling C (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy using endoloops: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 18: 749–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177: 250–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9: 17–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katkhouda N, Friedlander MH, Grant SW, Achanta KK, Essani R, Paik Peter, Velmahos G, Campos G, Mason R, Mavor E (2000) Intraabdominal abscess rate after laparoscopic appendectomy. Am J Surg 180: 456–461Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S (2005) Lapraroscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242: 439–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mancini GJ, Mancini ML, Nelson HS (2005) Efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis. Am Surg 71: 1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moberg F, Berndesen I, Palmquist U, Petersson T, Resh T, Montgomery A (2004) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for confirmed appendicitis. Br J Surg 92: 298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moreno M, Magos FJ, Arcovedo R, Olachea P, Palacios JA, Salazar A, Ramirez ME, Herrera JJ (2004) Comparison of the performance of the Gea extracorporeal knot with the Roeder extracorporeal knot and the classical knot. Surg Endosc 18: 157–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swamstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paik P, Towson BA, Anthone GJ, Ortega AE, Somons AJ, Beart RW Jr (1997) Intra-abdominal abscesses following laparoscopic and open appendectomies. J Gastro Surg 1: 188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Ronning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 88: 200–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15: 59–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryCoast Surgical GroupChula VistaUSA

Personalised recommendations