Advertisement

Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 742–746 | Cite as

Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction: patients’ outcome and cost-effectiveness

  • M. Khaikin
  • N. Schneidereit
  • S. Cera
  • D. Sands
  • J. Efron
  • E. G. Weiss
  • J. J. Nogueras
  • A. M. Vernava3rd
  • S. D. WexnerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Numerous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopy in the management of acute adhesive small-bowel obstruction (AASBO). However, comparative data with laparotomy are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopy and laparotomy for the treatment of AASBO in terms of patient outcome and cost-effectiveness.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent surgery for AASBO from 1999 to 2005 was conducted. Data recorded included operative and postoperative course, among others. Operative and total hospital charges were estimated from the Patient Accounting System.

Results

Thirty-one patients who underwent laparoscopy were matched to a similar group of patients who underwent laparotomy. In the laparoscopy group, four patients (13%) had a laparoscopy-assisted procedure and ten patients (32%) were converted. The laparoscopy group was subdivided into laparoscopy, laparoscopy-assisted, converted, and assisted-converted subgroups. In the majority of the patients, AASBO was secondary to a single band. Overall morbidity was significantly higher in the laparotomy group (p = 0.007). Morbidity rates were statistically significant between the laparoscopy and assisted-converted subgroups (p = 0.0001) but not between the laparotomy group and assisted-converted subgroup (p = 0.19). Median hospital stay and median time to first bowel movement were significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group. Charge data were available for only the last three years of the study. Operative charges and total hospital charges were similar between the laparoscopy and the laparotomy groups (p = 0.14 and p = 0.10, respectively). There was a significant difference in total hospital charges between the laparoscopy subgroup and laparotomy group (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Laparoscopy for AASBO is associated with reduced hospital stay, early recovery, and decreased morbidity. Laparoscopy-assisted and converted surgeries do not differ significantly from laparotomy in regard to patient outcome. Operative and total hospital charges are similar for both laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Adhesions Small bowel Obstruction Cost-effectiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Borzellino G, Tasselli S, Zerman G, Pedrazzani C, Manzoni G (2004) Laparoscopic approach to postoperative adhesive obstruction. Surg Endosc 18(4): 686–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chopra R, McVay C, Phillips E, Khalili TM (2003) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am Surg 69(11): 966–968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2003) Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg 197(2): 177–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garrard CL, Clements RH, Nanney L, Davidson JM, Richards WO (1999) Adhesion formation is reduced after laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13(1): 10–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirshtein B, Roy-Shapira A, Lantsberg L, Avinoach E, Mizrahi S (2005) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 19(4): 464–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kossi J, Salminen P, Rantala A, Laato M (2003) Population-based study of the surgical workload and economic impact of bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg 90(11): 1441–1444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levard H, Boudet MJ, Msika S, Molkhou JM, Hay JM, Laborde Y, Gillet M, Fingerhut A (2001) French Association for Surgical Research. Laparoscopic treatment of acute small bowel obstruction: a multicentre retrospective study. ANZ J Surg 71(11): 641–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, Fallas M, Rosenthal R (1996) Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 10(1): 15–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, Gordon PH (2000) Etiology of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 180(1): 33–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller G, Boman J, Shrier I, Gordon PH (2000) Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 87(9): 1240–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagle A, Ujiki M, Denham W, Murayama K (2004) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 187(4): 464–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Philipson BM, Bokey EL, Moore JW, Chapuis PH, Bagge E (1997) Cost of open versus laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for cancer. World J Surg 21(2): 214–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, Dissanaike S, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2002) Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 45(4): 485–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Strickland P, Lourie DJ, Suddleson EA, Blitz JB, Stain SC (1999) Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction? Surg Endosc 13(7): 695–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suter M, Zermatten P, Halkic N, Martinet O, Bettschart V (2000) Laparoscopic management of mechanical small bowel obstruction: are there predictors of success or failure? Surg Endosc 14(5): 478–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams SB, Greenspon J, Young HA, Orkin BA (2005) Small bowel obstruction: conservative vs. surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum 48(6): 1140–1146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wullstein C, Gross E (2003) Laparoscopic compared with conventional treatment of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 90(9): 1147–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Khaikin
    • 1
  • N. Schneidereit
    • 1
  • S. Cera
    • 1
  • D. Sands
    • 1
  • J. Efron
    • 1
  • E. G. Weiss
    • 1
  • J. J. Nogueras
    • 1
  • A. M. Vernava3rd
    • 1
  • S. D. Wexner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Colorectal SurgeryCleveland Clinic FloridaWestonUSA

Personalised recommendations