PROSPECT: a practical method for formulating evidence-based expert recommendations for the management of postoperative pain
Many patients still suffer severe acute pain in the postoperative period. Although guidelines for treating acute pain are widely published and promoted, most do not consider procedure-specific differences in pain experienced or in techniques that may be most effective and appropriate for different surgical settings. The procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) Working Group provides procedure-specific recommendations for postoperative pain management together with supporting evidence from systematic literature reviews and related procedures at http://www.postoppain.org
The methodology for PROSPECT reviews was developed and refined by discussion of the Working Group, and it adapts existing methods for formulation of consensus recommendations to the specific requirements of PROSPECT.
To formulate PROSPECT recommendations, we use a methodology that takes into account study quality and source and level of evidence, and we use recognized methods for achieving group consensus, thus reducing potential bias. The new methodology is first applied in full for the 2006 update of the PROSPECT review of postoperative pain management for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Transparency in PROSPECT processes allows the users to be fully aware of any limitations of the evidence and recommendations, thereby allowing for appropriate decisions in their own practice setting.
Key wordsPostoperative pain Evidence-based medicine
- 1.Acute Pain Guidelines: Scientific Evidence (2005) http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp104syn.htm – Accessed July 2006
- 3.Ashburn MA, Caplan MD, Carr DB, Connis RT, Ginsberg B, Green CR, Arbor A, Lema MJ, Nickinovich DG, J. RL (2004) Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology 100:1573–1581Google Scholar
- 6.Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV); Nationales Programm für Versorgungs-Leitlinien: Methoden-Report (2004). http://www.versorgungsleitlinien.de/methodik/pdf/nplmethode.pdf – Accessed July 2006
- 8.CEBM. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp – Accessed Dec 2005
- 10.Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/index.htm Accessed July 2006
- 18.Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]. http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm – Accessed July 2006
- 22.Kehlet H, Gray AW, Bonnet F, Camu F, Fischer HB, McCloy RF, Neugebauer EA, Puig MM, Rawal N, Simanski CJ (2005) A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:1396–1415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Neugebauer E, Schug S (2006) Procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations: a rigorous methodology to minimise bias. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 23:6Google Scholar
- 32.PROSPECT: Procedure-specific postoperative pain management. http://www.postoppain.org – Accessed July 2006
- 33.Rosenquist RW, Rosenberg J, United States Veterans Administration (2003) Postoperative pain guidelines. Reg Anesth Pain Med 28: 279–288. http://www.oqp.med.va.gov/cpg/cpg.htm – Accessed July 2006