Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 1142–1146 | Cite as

Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: clinical pathway implementation is efficient and cost effective and increases hospital bed capacity

  • B. TopalEmail author
  • G. Peeters
  • A. Verbert
  • F. Penninckx



Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OLC) may decrease the use of hospital resources and save costs. In the current study, the effect of implementing a clinical pathway has been assessed in terms of outcome for patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hospital costs, and available bed capacity.


Clinical outcome and hospital stay were analyzed for consecutive patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy 1 year before (n = 338) and after (n = 336) implementation of a clinical pathway. Patients with acute cholecystitis or bile duct lithiasis were excluded from the study. A cost accounting model was developed using the concept of the bill of activities.


Before implementation of the clinical pathway, 34 (94%) of 36 patients scheduled for OLC were discharged successfully on the day of surgery, as compared with 110 (94%) of 117 patients after pathway implementation. Among patients scheduled for OLC, the complication (0% vs 1.7%), unplanned admission (5.5% vs 6%), and readmission (0% vs 4.3%) rates were comparable before and after clinical pathway implementation. After pathway implementation, the increased number of OLCs resulted in a significant cost saving (40.5%) and benefit in bed capacity (1.41 beds per day per year) for the hospital.


The implementation of a clinical pathway preserves the clinical outcome for patients undergoing OLC. It creates a significant increase in the number of patients treated in an outpatient setting and confers a significant benefit in terms of hospital costs and available bed capacity.


Cholecystectomy Clinical pathway Cost Outpatient 


  1. 1.
    Baschnagel B, Hansen M, Aaning HL (2000) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience of a non–overnight center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10: 305–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calland JF (2000) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 233: 704–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collier PE (1997) Do clinical pathways for major vascular surgery improve outcomes and reduce costs? J Vasc Surg 26: 170–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fiorillo MA, Davidson PG, Fiorillo M, D’Anna Jr. JA, Sithian N, Silick RJ (1996) 149 ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 10: 52–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleischer LA, Yee K, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Heath R, Bass E, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Is outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe and cost effective? A model to study transition of care. Anesthesia 90: 1746–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain PK, Hayden JD, Sedman PC, Royston CMS, O’Boyle CJ (2005) A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 1082–1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, Dewit LT, Gouma DJ (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day care versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 228: 734–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maraïn PK, De Maria EJ (1997) Initial results of a prospective trial of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11: 1091–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKernan BJ (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 57: 309–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mjaland O, Raeder J, Aarboe V, Trondsen E, Buanes T (1997) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84: 958–961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reddick EJ, Olson DO (1990) Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 160: 485–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skattum J, Edwin B, Trondsen E, Mjaland O, Raeder J, Buanes T (2004) Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs. Surg Endosc 18: 796–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soria V, Pellicer E, Flores B, Carrasco M, Candel MF, Aguayo JL (2005) Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 71: 40–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor E, Gaw F, Kennedy C (1996) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy feasibility. J Laparosc Endosc Surg 6: 73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uchiyama K, Takifuji K, Tani M, Onishi H, Yamaue H (2002) Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1594–1597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Voyles CR, Berch BR (1997) Selection criteria for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory care setting. Surg Endosc 11: 1145–1146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zegarra RF, Saba AK, Peschiera JL (1997) Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safe and cost effective? Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 487–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Topal
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Peeters
    • 1
  • A. Verbert
    • 1
  • F. Penninckx
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Abdominal SurgeryUniversity Hospital GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations