Surgical Endoscopy

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 902–906

Effect of surgeon on outcome of antireflux surgery

  • Pavi Singh Kundhal
  • Julie L. Harnish
  • David R. Urbach
Article

Abstract

Background

We sought to determine whether subjective outcomes one or more years after antireflux surgery are affected by the operating surgeon.

Methods

We reviewed records of patients who had antireflux surgery from June 2000 to June 2002 and mailed the patients a 19-item survey that focused on current medication use, postoperative symptom improvement, and satisfaction with surgery. We tested the significance of predictor variables using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables.

Results

We mailed the survey to 74 patients. Ninety-one percent of the operations were initially laparoscopic, with 5 (7%) subsequently converting to open. Ninety-five percent of patients were taking protein pump inhibitors (PPIs) preoperatively. Surgeons (n = 7) were divided into four groups, with the four surgeons who did two or fewer procedures in one group. Fifty-two of 74 patients (70%) responded to the survey (mean age, [SD] 44 [21] years, 37% male). The mean duration of followup was 2.1 [0.46] years. Thirty-eight percent of patients were taking medications for gastroesophageal reflux disease at the time of survey completion. It was found that the surgeon had an influence on patients’ perceptions of the success of the surgery and whether having surgery was a good idea. We did not identify a statistically significant effect of the surgeon on preoperative symptom severity, postoperative ability to belch, dysphagia, medication use, and lifestyle.

Conclusion

A patient’s surgeon has an effect on satisfaction with antireflux surgery. Further research should clarify specific practices of the surgeon (patient selection, operative technique, followup) associated with best outcome.

Keywords

Clinical papers Trials Research GORD Gastroesophageal reflux disease Surgeon factors Outcomes Variation 

References

  1. 1.
    Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, Rankin RN, Clagett GP, Hachinski VC, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, Meldrum HE, Spence JD (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339(20): 1415–1425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349(22): 2117–2127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deschamps C, Allen MS, Trastek VF, Johnson JO, Pairolero PC (1998) Early experience and learning curve associated with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 15(2): 281–284Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herrmann D (1995) Reporting current, past and changed health status. What we know about distortion. Med Care 33: AS89–AS94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, Wetscher G, Neary P, DeMeester TR, Perdikis G (1994) Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 220(4): 472–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howden C, Castell D, Cohen S, Freston JW, Orlando RC, Robinson M (1995) The rationale for continuous maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis. Arch Intern Med 155: 1465–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klapow JC, Wilcox CM, Mallinger AP, Marks R, Heudebert GR, Centor RM, Lawrence W, Richter J (2002) Characterization of long-term outcomes after Toupet fundoplication: symptoms, medication use, and health status. J Clin Gastroenterol 34(5): 509–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu JY, Woloshin S, Laycock WS, Schwartz LM (2002) Late outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux. Arch Surg 137: 397–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luostarinen ME, Isolauri JO (1999) Surgical experience improves the long-term results of Nissen fundoplication. Scand J Gastroenterol 34(2): 117–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato K, Awad ZT, Filipi CJ, Selima MA, Cummings JE, Fenton SJ, Hinder RA (2002) Causes of long-term dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. JSLS 6(1): 35–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soot SJ, Eshraghi N, Farahmand M, Sheppard BC, Deveney CW (1999) Transition from open to laparoscopic fundoplication: the learning curve. Arch Surg 134(3): 278–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spechler S, Lee E, Ahnen D, Goyal RK, Hirano I, Ramirez F, Raufman JP, Sampliner R, Schnell T, Sontag S, Vlahcevic ZR, Young R, Williford W (2001) Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 285: 2331–2338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Statistics on surgery performed in the United States. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/hcupnet.htm [accessed April 5, 2004]
  14. 14.
    Terry M, Smith CD, Branum GD, Galloway K, Waring JP, Hunter JG (2001) Outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 15: 691–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waring JP (1999) Postfundoplication complications. Prevention and management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 28(4): 1007–1019, viii-ixPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams JL (2003) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical manifestations. Gastroenterol Nursing 26(5): 95–200Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu JS, Dunnegan DL, Luttmann DR, Soper NJ (1996) The influence of surgical technique on clinical outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc 10(12): 1164–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavi Singh Kundhal
    • 1
  • Julie L. Harnish
    • 1
  • David R. Urbach
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Divisions of General Surgery and Clinical Decision Making and Health CareUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Toronto General Hospital Research InstituteTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations